 |
|
10-18-2008, 04:00 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: -, France
Posts: 22,971
|
|
|
Queen Rania's Daytime Fashion Part 3: October 2008 - February 2009
- In order to legally post copyrighted material, you must obtain written permission from the copyright owner.
- No more than 20% of the text of an article can be posted, along with a link to the original article.
- It's a copyright violation to post translations of entire articles.
- Hotlinking of content from other websites is not permitted.
- We expect our members to treat each other with respect.
- Opinions should be backed up by reference to published reports.
- Empty posts, that is posts that do not add or contribute to the discussion, will be deleted without notice.
If you have any questions, please contact a member of the moderating team.
Happy posting!
Royal House of Fashion Moderators
Mandy, TheTruth, Glitteringtiaras & dazzling
|
10-18-2008, 04:18 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 312
|
|
|
Rania's Dior jacket in Spain is the same one Carla Sarkozy wore to meet the Pope last month. That is not the first time they have worn the same Dior outfit, but with Carla wearing it first. I wonder that Rania doesn't avoid this, given she has in the past seemed to choose designers that other royals / first ladies don't automatically choose - e.g Graeme Black, Jonathan Saunders, Rick Owens, Giambattista Valli, Bottega Veneta. I get the feeling she likes to look different to the others.
The museum outfit is by Louis Vuitton.
The evening outfit is the same as she wore to the Synergos dinner in New York.
|
10-18-2008, 06:18 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: -, New Zealand
Posts: 2,308
|
|
|
Queen Rania has enviable access to such wonderful designers!
(Read: Very very jealous - I should be so lucky... (LOL))
|
10-18-2008, 08:00 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 1,307
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chelsea
Rania's Dior jacket in Spain is the same one Carla Sarkozy wore to meet the Pope last month. That is not the first time they have worn the same Dior outfit, but with Carla wearing it first. I wonder that Rania doesn't avoid this, given she has in the past seemed to choose designers that other royals / first ladies don't automatically choose - e.g Graeme Black, Jonathan Saunders, Rick Owens, Giambattista Valli, Bottega Veneta. I get the feeling she likes to look different to the others.
The museum outfit is by Louis Vuitton.
The evening outfit is the same as she wore to the Synergos dinner in New York.
|
Thank you Chelsea for the interesting information.
|
10-19-2008, 04:29 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,596
|
|
|
I really liked the outfit Rania wore to the Arabic House but whilst I liked the bag I hated the huge Prada logo on it. Personally I find it very tacky when people sport large insignias and Prada always splashes their tacky design on their products.
|
10-19-2008, 02:50 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ~, United States
Posts: 4,827
|
|
|
I agree with you, Little Star. I really don't like it on clothing or shoes. It just looks ridiculous, IMO. Somehow, I don't mind it as much on bags (not sure why I feel that way). I always find it a bit disappointing to see royals in clothing with large logos.
|
10-19-2008, 03:36 PM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: -, New Zealand
Posts: 2,308
|
|
|
Conspicuous consumption. I really hate it on clothes. I dont mind a key characteristic (e.g. the red shoe soles) but I dont like labels on clothes. With bags something small and classy is fine by me.
|
10-19-2008, 03:39 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ~, United States
Posts: 4,827
|
|
|
Oohh...the red soles! That is another story. I really don't mind (actually, I love) the red soles. I just feel that royals should be above the need to wear clothing or items with large labels on them.
|
10-20-2008, 10:21 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: T/H, Morocco
Posts: 9,500
|
|
|
i quit like her arrival outfit very elgant combination between grey and purpule,the bag is too big tought it's grey but don't suit the look at all.
her outfit from Arab house is ok,buti just have enough of this look on Rania.
|
10-20-2008, 01:01 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbia, United States
Posts: 2,888
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgl
Oohh...the red soles! That is another story. I really don't mind (actually, I love) the red soles. I just feel that royals should be above the need to wear clothing or items with large labels on them.
|
I quite agree, and like you I do love Louboutin shoes, the red soles give them away and therefore, we all definately know they were expensive. I've never been a big fan of labels on anything, I suppose that is my reason for not purchasing brands like Coach that have their insignia all over them.
|
10-20-2008, 01:38 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: -, France
Posts: 22,971
|
|
Oct 20, 2008 - Rania in a printed dress which looks like wearing a shirt/t-shirt under it. I quite like the look and the dress.
Close Up -- Full View and in this picture you can see the back of the dress. Comes up to the mid back.
|
10-20-2008, 01:59 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 312
|
|
|
the dress is by Louis Vuitton or Marc Jacobs. I remember seeing it a month or two ago in a more revealing version. The bag is another Zagliani one
|
10-20-2008, 02:02 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 312
|
|
|
the dress Rania wore to arrive in Chile is the Bottega Veneta dress she wore in New York
|
10-20-2008, 02:04 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ---, Portugal
Posts: 10,691
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chelsea
the dress Rania wore to arrive in Chile is the Bottega Veneta dress she wore in New York
|
Do you have a pic Chelsea?
|
10-20-2008, 02:04 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 312
|
|
|
Sorry but why is she wearing t-shirt under that beautiful dress? It is the same one I saw and she has ruined it in my opinion. If it is too revealing, is it not better just to wear something more appropriate?
|
10-20-2008, 02:06 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,596
|
|
|
Gorgeous dress, she looks lovely.
|
10-20-2008, 02:13 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: T/H, Morocco
Posts: 9,500
|
|
|
for sur she looks beautiful,but i join chelsea's opinion i think what she is wearing under the dress is not elegant at all,i have no idea why she is wearing it the dress is so beautiful without this addition.
|
10-20-2008, 02:26 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 312
|
|
|
|
10-20-2008, 03:03 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: -, France
Posts: 22,971
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mademoiselle Lilo
for sur she looks beautiful,but i join chelsea's opinion i think what she is wearing under the dress is not elegant at all,i have no idea why she is wearing it the dress is so beautiful without this addition.
|
She wore it becasue the dress itself is too revealing. Look at the back view picture, the dress is quite low and quite open at the front. A jacket wouldnt have covered it up nicely nor would have looked good.
|
10-20-2008, 03:27 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: T/H, Morocco
Posts: 9,500
|
|
ok dazzling thanks for the explanation
but i still think this the under T-shirt don't suit the lovely dress and make it not elagant.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
