But I think she's too young to already live with her boyfriend.
Can understand that you may think that. But she is almost 20 and already lives in her own apartment. So nothing wrong IMO that she's having her boyfriend living there with her.
--------------------
I do too, but she’s a very independent and strong-minded young woman and it’s not like living with a partner is uncommon in Norway.
Not uncommon at all in liberal and modern Norway to live with your partner when you're 20. And he is 23.
--------------------
Remember that this magazine also wrote that Ingrid Alexandra would not go to the military, but would go to the UK this august to study to be close to her BF, one day later her military plans and work at Uranienborg school was anounced.
Yes, and they were probably just taking a guess because her boyfriend was studying in the UK. (Would have loved to have seen their faces when they found out they were wrong. LOL.)
Her bf lives in the UK where he studies and he is not finnished the magazine even writes thenselves.
Yes, a weird article! They write that he is scheduled to finish his studies at Lancaster University Management School in June. How can he then be living with Ingrid? Well, most likely they are just living together when he is in Norway, which is not the same at all.
But Se og Hør also writes that he is working at Front Ocean Management at Aker Brygge in Oslo at the same time as he is studying in the UK. Hmmmm, sounds a bit weird (perhaps he is doing some work for them in the UK).
when Haakon and Mette-Marit moved in together it was anounced by the palace. Here it is the usual no comment on the private lives.
Haakon was the heir.
Ingrid is not, and she is only 20, so I don't think the court would have commented on it even if Ingrid and Magnus were living together.
Se og Hør just want an excuse to take more papparazzi photos of them because they know she sells, and somehow the experts obliged and said it was of public interest…
Agree that Se og Hør just wanted an excuse to take more photos of her, but doubt that Trond Norén Isaksen obliged to anything.
And yes, he does write some articles for them about history and stuff, but doubt they have any control over what he says to them. I mean, he is used by NRK and VG as well (and used to be a commentator at TV2).
--------------------
And to those who may wonder what kind of magazine Se og Hør is? Well, as I've written before here on TRF, they are a controversial/unreliable gossip mag! But as I said in my previous post, they are much more serious in their coverage of the NRF than what Danish Se og Hør is of the DRF (I mean the Danish version is just pure vile).
And the Norwegian version IMO also has a very good royal reporter/expert in Caroline Vagle, who seems very proper/reliable. - And she's used by TV2 and other media outlets here as well.
Their other main royal expert OTOH, Anders Johan Stavseng, is very good when it comes to exaggerations, whether it is when he is writing/talking about wars between British/Danish royal family members, etc (stories, most likely taken from the British tabloids and even worse, Danish Se og Hør). He has also said in an interview with the media-paper Journalisten that he ''elsker britiske tabloid-titler med krasse og morsomme ordspill'' (''loves British tabloid titles with crass and funny wordplays'').
And? Wearing some brands that someone else has worn hardly mean she is "inspired" by that person. Or they just have similar style. 
I know her parents lived like hippish couple before the wedding and I didn't like this either, but at least they were both well into their 20s at that time. 
