DuchessMia
Nobility
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2018
- Messages
- 375
- City
- Atlanta
- Country
- United States
Very happy for the Sussexes!
And yes, there are so many European Royals eg. Norway & Sweden who are also in the British Line of Succession, albeit way down the line.
Note that even if born on United States territory, this child will still be a dual citizen of the UK and US, like their older brother.
Automatic acquisition - GOV.UK
This was discussed in the the British Line of Succession thread. The Swedish royals were excluded from the British Line of Succession at least until 2015 and they may still be excluded, since under the Royal Marriages Act the descendants of Prince Gustaf Adolf and Princess Sibylla were illegitimate in the eyes of the United Kingdom.
I am guessing she is 4 months along ..so I would guess July.
......................
I don't think Meghan's pregnancy was obvious in the CNN appearance. But surely there was lots of looking and silent speculation by observers, since there was every possibility since her miscarriage that they would try again as soon as possible.
Remember back in Nov (?) when it was 60 something and she was in a parka and loose green top? I said then I thought she was trying to camouflage .
I think we have all been waiting for an announcement.
LaRae
Actually it was closer to 80 degrees Farhenheit that day, so the parka was am attempt to conceal IMO.
Meghan is maybe 4 to 5 months by now, judging from the picture. But we don't know.
Indeed @Pranter, the papped picture with M&H leaving that building in L.A., it definitely looked to me like the loose black top Meg was wearing under the bulky jacket was hiding a baby bump. I just think that due to the earlier miscarriage most people kept silent about their inner speculations.
When I suspected, I immediately hoped for twins for them due to the earlier miscarriage. And to foil Harry's impulsive response, "Two maximum," to Jane Goodall in the 2019 British Vogue chat they had. LOL!
Meghan is 39. She will be 40 on August 4, 2021. Well after the birth of this baby.
I and a few other posters live here so we can assure you that it was definitely closer to 80 degrees that day.? However I do agree with you that she chose the heavy parka for discretion.It was reportedly in the 70s that day. I agree Meghan was being discreet, along with fashionable. Harry wore long sleeves, but definitely not a jacket. It's a different weather-related situation for him to get used to in L.A. Meghan seemed mostly bundled up for protection and discretion.
I don't think Meghan's pregnancy was obvious in the CNN appearance. But surely there was lots of looking and silent speculation by observers, since there was every possibility since her miscarriage that they would try again as soon as possible.
Actually it was closer to 80 degrees Farhenheit that day, so the parka was am attempt to conceal IMO.
I and a few other posters live here so we can assure you that it was definitely closer to 80 degrees that day.? However I do agree with you that she chose the heavy parka for discretion.
I and a few other posters live here so we can assure you that it was definitely closer to 80 degrees that day.? However I do agree with you that she chose the heavy parka for discretion.
This is wonderful news for the couple. Hoping for the best of health for mother and child.
I am curious about the Victoria Arbiter tweet, "The family was told shortly before the announcement was made public." Told about that the announcement will be made or about the pregnancy itself? If the latter, that's quite a long time to not tell family...