 |
|

01-13-2020, 09:36 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,073
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ista
Yes, the addition of the "royal" to Sussex has always been the sticking point for me, but we'll see how that plays out. The Sussexes certainly have gone to a lot of trouble to set up the Sussex Royal brand, so using it may be non-negotiable for them. It all depends on how scorched earth they are willing to go.
|
Scorched earth policy would be totally stupid and really underscore and reinforce public perceptions that they are spitting in the face of the monarchy. It would make for a riveting interview but of little long term value to their lives.
|

01-13-2020, 09:37 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 16,253
|
|
Feel free to delete if this has been posted before.
According to Evening Standard, the Canadian PM has pledged that Canada will cover the security costs while H&M are in Canada.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/c...-a4332906.html
|

01-13-2020, 09:38 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 4,011
|
|
Interesting update about Canada. I have to say I am a bit surprised.
|

01-13-2020, 09:42 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Along with the bullying statement posted by the same RR
Rebecca English @RE_DailyMail
For what it is worth, we are also being told today that Harry and Meghan have 'no plans' to do an interview (television or print)....
|

01-13-2020, 09:42 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: the West, United States
Posts: 4,681
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by suztav
Scorched earth policy would be totally stupid and really underscore and reinforce public perceptions that they are spitting in the face of the monarchy. It would make for a riveting interview but of little long term value to their lives.
|
Agreed. However, I've already been astonished at some of the things the Sussexes have done, and their willingness to air things that most royals would never give friends permission to say, or wouldn't say themselves to reporters. And to flout a direct request from the Queen and Prince Charles. So. We'll see.
|

01-13-2020, 09:42 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 9,236
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muhler
|
As I expected. Even more so with a PM like Trudeau who is personally friends with Meghan.
We have to wait for official confirmation, but basically British police cannot provide 24/7 protection on a permanent basis in a sovereign foreign country. If H&M want to live most of the year ( or at least a significant part of the year) in Canada and have public security , the Canadian police will have to do it. From what I understood from our fellow Canadian posters ( than you again!), it will be the RCMP, that is, the federal/national police, that will be responsible for protecting them.
Edit: should we assume they have already figured out the immigration situation also? If so, I am waiting for the political fallout in Canada.
|

01-13-2020, 09:49 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 988
|
|
What time is the meeting? When will it get over? Do we get to know any conclusive outcome today?
__________________
The only word I hate in the Royal Dictionary - ABDICATION
|

01-13-2020, 09:58 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Leicestershire, United Kingdom
Posts: 392
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter
Along with the bullying statement posted by the same RR
Rebecca English @RE_DailyMail
For what it is worth, we are also being told today that Harry and Meghan have 'no plans' to do an interview (television or print)....
|
I do think this is interesting but mainly because the Sussexes have implied that they wont be liaising with RR - so how would Rebecca know if that is the case?
|

01-13-2020, 09:59 AM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 1,060
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vkrish
What time is the meeting? When will it get over? Do we get to know any conclusive outcome today?
|
The meeting starts at 2:00 pm
|

01-13-2020, 10:00 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 13,206
|
|
As per Twitter, Harry arrived at 11.20am, whilst William arrived at 1.45pm.
|

01-13-2020, 10:01 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Leicestershire, United Kingdom
Posts: 392
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vkrish
What time is the meeting? When will it get over? Do we get to know any conclusive outcome today?
|
Supposedly the meeting is 2pm (Harry arrived prior to that according to royal reporters) - I can't see how something can't be announced, even if it's just to say negotiations are still ongoing?? Surely??
|

01-13-2020, 10:03 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 4,011
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel
As per Twitter, Harry arrived at 11.20am, whilst William arrived at 1.45pm.
|
Sounds about right. Make sense for HMQ and PoW to talk to him alone first.
|

01-13-2020, 10:05 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 3,033
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter
Along with the bullying statement posted by the same RR
Rebecca English @RE_DailyMail
For what it is worth, we are also being told today that Harry and Meghan have 'no plans' to do an interview (television or print)....
|
So it confirms that the statement was aimed at Tom Bradby's article
|

01-13-2020, 10:06 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 830
|
|
I'll interrupt to bring up something the papers finally mentioned today that I remember hearing abut when Diana got divorced. There's a 300 year old rule that says the queen's grandchildren are her custodial children should anything happen. Something like that. I thought that's maybe why they left Archie in Canada. The paper said it wouldn't apply to Archie and the Queen because he's her great grandchild not her grandchild - but it would apply to Charles and Archie. He would get custody of Archie.
|

01-13-2020, 10:07 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 13,206
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by QueenMathilde
I'll interrupt to bring up something the papers finally mentioned today that I remember hearing abut when Diana got divorced. There's a 300 year old rule that says the queen's grandchildren are her custodial children should anything happen. Something like that. I thought that's maybe why they left Archie in Canada. The paper said it wouldn't apply to Archie and the Queen because he's her great grandchild not her grandchild - but it would apply to Charles and Archie. He would get custody of Archie.
|
I would be surprised if such a rule were to be implemented today.
|

01-13-2020, 10:11 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Woodbury, United States
Posts: 2,629
|
|
So maybe H & M should so some appreciation for their father and father-in-law...If Charles wants to support his son out of his pocket, that’s fine (though, Harry wouldn’t exactly be independent then), but not from the Duchy.
Quote:
The Prince of Wales has been paying millions of pounds extra to fund Harry and Meghan’s lifestyle from his private income — on top of the money he gives them from the profits of the Duchy of Cornwall, the Standard has learned.
At one stage he was paying the Sussexes, who say they want to be financially independent in their new role once they step down as “senior royals”, more than Prince William and his family. That figure is now around the same.
Inside sources say Charles paid out “hundreds of thousands of pounds” in private income too to help furnish Harry and Meghan’s Windsor home, Frogmore Cottage, in addition to the £2.4 million of taxpayers’ money spent on renovations.
“On top of that he paid out a small fortune for their wedding,” a source said.
Another source told the Standard: “There is a great deal of hurt given that the Prince of Wales has gone out of his way to help his son who he loves dearly and embrace his daughter-in-law into the family.
|
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/c...box=1578917392
|

01-13-2020, 10:20 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: the West, United States
Posts: 4,681
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Betsypaige
So maybe H & M should so some appreciation for their father and father-in-law...If Charles wants to support his son out of his pocket, that’s fine (though, Harry wouldn’t exactly be independent then), but not from the Duchy.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/c...box=1578917392
|
I always assumed that Charles privately funded both his sons in addition to Duchy money, so I'm not sure how much news this is. Aside from the issue of personal hurt Charles may or may not be feeling, it certainly does illustrate how complicated and expensive Harry and Meghan living abroad may be--we haven't even gotten to the issue of who is going to pay for their home(s) in Canada and/or the US.
The tax situation has always been an interesting and expensive one.
|

01-13-2020, 10:23 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Somewhere, United States
Posts: 3,281
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter
Along with the bullying statement posted by the same RR
Rebecca English @RE_DailyMail
For what it is worth, we are also being told today that Harry and Meghan have 'no plans' to do an interview (television or print)....
|
I think that is something they needed address directly, especially since that was coming from Tom Bradby. So- good.
That and the bullying.
|

01-13-2020, 10:25 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TortillaChips
I do think this is interesting but mainly because the Sussexes have implied that they wont be liaising with RR - so how would Rebecca know if that is the case?
|
Typically even the RR won't claim they were told by BP if they weren't told by BP.
LaRae
|

01-13-2020, 10:25 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 9,236
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ista
I always assumed that Charles privately funded both his sons in addition to Duchy money, so I'm not sure how much news this is. Aside from the issue of personal hurt Charles may or may not be feeling, it certainly does illustrate how complicated and expensive Harry and Meghan living abroad may be--we haven't even gotten to the issue of who is going to pay for their home(s) in Canada and/or the US.
The tax situation has always been an interesting and expensive one.
|
I would assume they are expected to pay for their home in Canada themselves. That is the minimum definition of “ financial independence “ .
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|