I’m wondering exactly what Chantell was asked by the DM reporter? Was it something innocuous or maybe potentially a statement that could be manipulated to look the opposite of whatever she truly said. Remember, this is a notorious tabloid.
Asked whether the Princess would now return to the arm's-length arrangement the couple had before her departure, Ms Wittstock, married to Charlene's brother Sean, who is on the board of her charitable foundation, said: 'Oh, we don't know yet. She'll probably be commuting between the two, wherever she's comfortable.
'And none of that is clear yet where she'll be settling or anything like that. I mean, she only just arrived back, so it's everybody finding their feet. The Princess is very excited to see her kids and they're very excited to see their mom again.
'So we'll see where she'll be settling.' She added: 'But it will be with her husband and her children.'
And she did end that short answer with ‘It will be with her husband and her children’. Which, if the newspaper wasn’t twisting things to seem different, appears contradictory.