If the main mission of a king is to attract investment to the country, I believe that Paul would be a good king of Greece, he has an impressive business agenda, possibly better than many European kings. It would be perfect to attract investment to any state. Regarding his life. I see that many people who follow European monarchies, the only thing that interests them is that brand dress, they are those jewels worn by their queen, where she is on vacation, in what luxurious restaurant she eats, how luxurious her palace .. For this reason, I do not believe that the life of the Crown Prince is debatable,.
Regarding Greece. since 1974 laws have been drawn up in Greece exclusively for the extermination of the Royal House, from a law to remove the passport, laws to remove the statues of kings, even to change the streets of name .... in the history books, the history the kings does not appear, so for example, in the conquest of Thessalonica, .... History in Greece is distorted and depressed. in the Greek ministries hangs the pictures of communist guerrilla leaders ....
Prince Paul could invent a character, behave like a ruling prince, and share the photos:
He could publish the photos delivering the titles to the students of Prince Charles's foundation, posing at home sitting on a chair in the form of a throne, strolling with the pictures of the Greek kings, he could even put pictures of Greek anarchist demonstrations and say which are manifestations against the system, soon there will be monarchy ...
But the prince does not have as much free time to do it.