Tsuneyasu Takeda is a right-winged political commentator who has also taught constitutional law at Keio University and famously supports male-only succession […]
Thank you for answering that question. See, what you give us here perfectly serves to illustrate what I meant when I said that you might be picking and choosing pieces from the wealth of information that is available to you as a Japanese native speaker, thereby creating a very specific image in our minds. You are doing this in a very skillful way and I want to use this example in order to show just once to everybody what I mean here.
All what you say about Takeda is in itself correct but would inevitably lead us in a direction of seeing him as an unbiased, well-meaning watcher of this whole Komuro story. You have omitted those parts that would make us suspect him of having an agenda here. I have a very hard time assuming that this is by accident.
So, I´d like to inform everybody who is reading this that Takeda published a book titled „The untold truth of the imperial family“ in which he advocates for maintaining the male bloodline in the imperial succession. In order to achieve that goal he strongly advocates for reinstating the former collateral branches that lost their imperial status after World War II (to whom he himself belongs): „Though we are now in different circumstances, each of us should try to find out what can be done, and have the resolve to return to royal status.“
Source
In short: the man wants to be a prince. (He has admittedly told a journalist that he „could not imagine“ to return to imperial status but then, what else could he say?)
his family still exerts a considerable amount of influence due to their imperial connections [...] Tsunayasu also frequently appears on radio and mainstream television to commentate on the Imperial Family due to his family background.
You make it sound here as if Takeda were some sort of spokesperson for his family or for the descendants of the collateral branches but, by his very own account, he is not. The heads of the former collateral branch families agreed in late 2004 to not speak out on the issue of imperial succession in public. Accordingly, they asked Takeda to refrain from writing his book. But he refused to comply with their wishes.
Takeda is constantly being labeled the great-great grandson of Emperor Meiji. He sure is, but only by one of Meiji´s daughters, that means by the female bloodline while his connection to the imperial family by the male bloodline dates back some 600 years or such. (I am fine with the female bloodline, of course, but apparently Takeda is not, that´s what all of this is about. I find it rather ironic that Takeda would on one hand make so much of his being descended from Emperor Meiji while at the same time dismissing the female bloodline that gives him this connection in the first place.) What is while not openly said but in a way tacitly implied when mentioning him being the great-great grandson of Emperor Meiji is that his opinion might in some way, shape or form give some indication on what the opinion of the imperial family on this matter might be. (They are, of course, not allowed to share it publicly.) This is, however, very far from the truth.
According to a Japanese poster in this forum, Takeda publicly expressed his admiration for a person who said that they would assassinate the prime minister if he introduced legislation that would make Princess Aiko the imperial heir.
Source
It is one thing to hold an opinion, it is quite another to condone violence. In my view, Takeda is an extremist which means that he is in opposition to one of the core values of the imperial family.
Emperor Akihito has taken great pains throughout his reign to make it quite clear to the public that he does not support extremism, and Emperor Naruhito is following in his father´s footsteps in this regard.
his family still exerts a considerable amount of influence due to their imperial connections, especially when you consider the immense privilege Tsunayasu’s father has been able to enjoy.
As far as I am informed, Tsunekazu Takeda is under investigation for alleged bribery regarding the 2020 Olympics and stepped down as President of the Japanese Olympic Committee because of that. Just sayin´...
Tl, dr: Tsuneyasu Takeda is not a neutral or well-meaning watcher in this whole Komuro issue, quite to the contrary.
The Japanese government has what seems for the umpteenth time set up discussions on what to do in order to preserve the Japanese monarchy. Considering that there is one single heir in the next generation, there are basically two options: let the princesses after marriage in some way, shape or form remain part of the family so they can offer support in public duties and maybe even provide an heir if Hisahito should not be able to produce one. Or reinstate members of the former collateral branches. Basically these are the two options. And the majority of the public has never been in favour of reinstating the former royals. They will probably put it off another ten years, but if a decision has to be made, it will probably be in favour of the princesses. This scandal around Komuro must seem like a gift from heaven for Takeda. He must be passionately interested in fanning the flames here. If Mako married a man who would be welcome and popular with the public, Takeda´s chances of becoming a royal would irrevocably be toast.
Kikunohana, you have presented Takeda to us as an unbiased, valuable commenter on the issue, you have even doubled down on that after I had drawn your attention to the fact that most readers here would not be familiar with his name - although you must well know that he has a horse in this race himself. In this case I happen to have the information I need in order to know that what you write is potentially misleading and that you have informed us in a very partisan way.
As a result, I do not see any use in discussing the bullying accusations with you because after what I have read from you so far, I am sure that if there were any mitigating circumstances or if there were any reason to doubt what is presented to us you would not be willing to inform us about it.
That does not mean that I think that the accusations against Komuro are false. Maybe they are true and maybe Komuro is a horrible person. The reports do sound very concerning, I will give you that.
What keeps me somewhat from fully believing them is that, as I have said before, I am having some sort of a déjà vu here.
During the time when Empress Masako was the object of the media bullying there were also countless stories on why she was so useless, most of them from Japanese sources (only). When posters here tried to find excuses for her or other explanations for why she had done something seemingly bad, there was always another story and another story that backed up the allegations. And at some point there was always this same: „Maybe you Westerners do not understand why this is so bad but according to Japanese culture, this is simply unacceptable.“ In the case of the empress her defenders were in a relatively better position because there was quite a bit of information about her to be found in English as she had been somewhat famous even before her marriage.
In Komuro´s case we do not have that sort of information. We are mostly dependent on what we get from Japanese sources. But even if we choose to use the Google translator there is no certainty in that information either. The Japanese media system is in a very fundamental way different from the Western system, so it is impossible for us to reliably evaluate the information it gives us. I am certainly no expert on it but that much I know.
While I am very aware of the necessities of putting things into perspective and drawing my own conclusions when I read your contributions I´d like to repeat that I do appreciate the facts that you give us.
Unfortunately,
The Imperial House Economy Council decides, not the taxpayers even though it is their money.
Well, that is how representative democracies usually work. (You might want to fix that link, it does not lead anywhere.)