rominet09
Heir Apparent
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2006
- Messages
- 5,753
- City
- LIEGE
- Country
- Belgium
He looks lovely and such a cute little nose !!!!
From the glimpse of his chubby little newborn face I can't tell who he looks like yet. I wish we could see the color of his hair! But I guess we won't see him again until he is christened.
I have to admit I much prefer this type of "Royal baby rollout" to any of the previous ones.
I need to see a comparison of two pictures - Meghan with her hand on Harry's back after the engagement announcement and Meghan with her hand on Harry's back today when they were leaving the photocall. Great moments, amazing love.
Such a happy moment!
Also, am I the only one more excited about seeing the new parents completely happy with their baby? I'm so sorry, but for me all newborns just look exactly the same...
Of course, royal couples should present their baby in the way wish, but I hope we see palace or castles baby reveals from now on. The presentation of baby Sussex in St. George’s Hall was absolutely stunning and touching.
Of course, royal couples should present their baby in the way wish, but I hope we see palace or castles royal baby reveals from now on. The presentation of baby Sussex in St. George’s Hall was absolutely stunning and touching.
Speculation is name will be released later today after the meeting with the Queen.
I hope so. I was surprised to learn yesterday that the Queen and Prince Philip kept Charles’ name private for a whole month! It took Andrew and Fergie two weeks to announce it for Beatrice.
I really like how the photocall worked in the castle. It was nice to see the new family in a quieter environment and answering questions instead of kind of at arm’s length and reacting to the wall of press as much as to their baby.
But after seeing what they did I really can’t understand why they made a point of inviting an American videographer. That guy’s footage won’t be any different from the British footage except for a slight difference in angle. Who shot it honestly makes no difference to the American press as long as it’s shared with everyone.
I don't think it's the time or place In the end, both families did what they thought was right for them and maybe it'd be better not to compare the two.I agree it would have been nice if the Cambridges could have done this several days later after the birth of their children. This was lovely for us and not too taxing for the parents. Even though they appeared a little apprehensive.
Maybe he hasn't any! (hair, I mean. Some babies are as bald as an egg!) ..
I notice little baby boy has full pouty lips.
I wonder if thats the african american genes coming through. So cute!.
... But after seeing what they did I really can’t understand why they made a point of inviting an American videographer. That guy’s footage won’t be any different from the British footage except for a slight difference in angle. Who shot it honestly makes no difference to the American press as long as it’s shared with everyone.
Are you really discussing racial questions here? Shame on you!
It‘s a baby, cute as any other, nothing special but still a miracle.
Was anyone else besides me scouring the little one's face for signs of freckles? It would be so cute if the baby had Harry's ginger hair and Meghan's freckles.
I think it's because Meghan is American, and they have generally always tried to acknowledge that fact. There were American touches during the wedding (although I could have done without Bishop Curry's rambling ?), the gospel choir, albeit they were British with international roots from Africa to the Caribbean most likely. And don't forget that the wedding announcements consisted of American ink on British paper.
There's also rumors that the Sussexes may want their child to attend an American International school in England.