I agree with you @USRoyalWatcher, there is some new information that I wasn't aware of that is mentioned in this article. Forget about imperfect prose! The writer discusses the topic of Harry and Meghan's relationship with no-holds barred. He's likely interested in garnering readership clicks, but what the hey, he provides some interesting commentary.
Anyway for starters, perhaps the initial turn-off for some of us is how the article's title is rather OTT salacious. The author claims to be friends with people who run in royal circles. Maybe he can tell us what Meghan wore to Pippa's wedding party?
Yes, the writer does repeat a lot of what many of us have already been discussing and speculating on for months! I have previously posted that if there is to be an engagement, it might happen around Meghan's birthday in August, and if not then, at least by November.
However, if it's true that the writer/blogger does have reliable insider sources, it will definitely be interesting to see how everything plays out. The most fascinating thing for me in the article, that I was not fully aware of is how the royal family (instead of necessarily being involved in bloody internecine warfare), are more often having to battle with stuck-in-the-mud royal courtiers. In my opinion, these courtiers are probably more intent upon preserving their own bread-and-butter royal lives, than they are on protecting royal institutions and royal personages.
Wow, if true that it's often palace insiders who work in concert with some of the slimy tabloid publications. Ugh! Jeez, the courtiers and tabloids sure as hell have picked the wrong battle with Prince Harry.
And I totally would not underestimate Meghan Markle's ability to hold her own either.
I do agree with the writer though that Meghan is the 'breath of fresh air' the royal family needs in this day and age.
The writer also mentions the ongoing speculation about Cressida Bonas being someone who was more or less foisted upon Harry as a good aristocratic marriage prospect. As I said in a previous post, most young ladies in the aristocracy seemingly have not been interested post-Diana in marrying into the royal family either with William or Harry. But I think in the long run, that's a good thing! Re the discussion of other 'edgy' royal affairs of the past, very interesting, but also exceedingly unsurprising. At least they were adult consensual affairs. Again though, these are informative details I wasn't aware of because these types of stories are always kept on the down-low. Yes, Harry is lucky to be the second royal son living in a different time and able to marry someone he's in love with who makes him happy, regardless of her ethnic background.
On another note, I don't think the writer should be so bold as to denigrate or underestimate Duchess Kate (by saying she hasn't proven to be a 'breath of fresh air'). I believe that The Duchess of Cambridge is serving her role quite well, very effectively, and in the way that she pleases. She surely has important and significant behind-the-scenes influence on both William and Harry. As the saying goes,
"Walk softly and carry a big stick."
Both Kate and the Middletons have positively influenced and will continue to influence the future course of the British royal family.
ETA:
Oh Whoa, re some of the comments in the comments section of this article! And I do mean Whoa!
All the criticism of Meghan, to me, smacks of pure jealousy. Both Harry and Meghan have accomplished more in their lives and possess more genuine caring for others than these commenters ever will.