Prince Harry: Relationship Suggestions and Musings 2016-2017 - Page 231

Curryong · #**4601** 03-13-2017, 09:46 AM

Yes, if Meghan played Lizzie Borden killing her parents with an axe, that means she has homicidal instincts, of course! If she plays a demi monde, as Nichole Kidman did in Moulin Rouge, she's immoral. Heaven forbid that she should have a part as a street walker. That would make her a disgraceful and disgusting human being.

It is all acting, and plenty of actresses when they start off get sex scene parts. Most people realise this. There have been no porn films, no appearances nude in men's magazines. Just a young actress getting a start in a TV show that was watched by teens.

Osipi · #**4602** 03-13-2017, 09:54 AM

I would think that when it comes down to it, even the smuttiest implied sex scene that Meghan could have in her career would show less than the pictures published of Harry in his altogether in Vegas. The past works both ways for both people.

The past doesn't really matter for either one of these people. Its who they are now that defines what their relationship is and where they want it to go.

Rudolph · #**4603** 03-13-2017, 09:54 AM

Look at Sweden. It recently had a model marry into the family. Part of modelling means taking your clothes off. The people of Sweden are still free to make up their owns minds.

There was a lot of debate about Sofia but it turns out she appears to be popular.

I'm not sure why some people are trying to declare Meghan 'hands off'. If the British and Commonwealth public don't care Meghan is an actress, it won't be an issue.

AlowVera · #**4604** 03-13-2017, 10:01 AM

If MM is Harry's choice and non-negotiable then seriously what more needs to be said. I support his right to make his choice. I truly find all this commotion over the 5th in line to be rather peculiar. William and Kate and Charles and Camilla are the primary focus. Are they so lacking that pressure must be put on Harry to marry a virgin pixie dream princess?

miss whirley · #**4605** 03-13-2017, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudolph

Again, it's all part of the vetting process. If Chelsy's background was relevant, and Cressida's background was relevant, and Catherine's background was relevant, then Meghan's background is relevant.

Part of Meghan's background is she's an actress. People are free to make their own judgments on what's appropriate and what's not.

Yeah, I seem to remember the tabloids making a big deal over a pre-Harry acting role that Cressida had where she played a naughty schoolgirl willing to trade sexual favors.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...haunt-her.html

Expecting Meghan to get different treatment seems a little naive.

I really doubt Harry cares about any past roles or he wouldn't keep dating actresses.

AlowVera · #**4606** 03-13-2017, 10:09 AM

As always it is the female who must be pure as the driven snow. None of the males are held to the same standard. Barring any REAL controversy like actual nude pics I hope MM and Harry brush this silliness off their shoulders.

Curryong · #**4607** 03-13-2017, 10:09 AM

Nobody's calling for Meghan to get special treatment. And nobody's shocked. It's not a sex scene, as Meghan's not seen doing anything. It was also almost a decade ago.

However, some seem to want hands up in the air in horror and a collective 'LOOK AT what Meghan's been seen doing NOW! Is she a fit person to be in the BRF? Is this appropriate!'
Well, yes it is! She's an actress, for God's sake and everybody here that has responded to this being posted realises it.

AlowVera · #**4608** 03-13-2017, 10:21 AM

The sentiment was that this was the smoking gun that would banish MM from Harry's life. tumblr fans found the video, posted it and then notified the press about the existence of the video. So this is basically stans trying create enough controversy so that MM and Harry break-up.

Rudolph · #**4609** 03-13-2017, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miss whirley

Yeah, I seem to remember the tabloids making a big deal over a pre-Harry acting role that Cressida had where she played a naughty schoolgirl willing to trade sexual favors.

Cressida Bonas's Risqué Film Role Comes Back To Haunt Her - The Daily Beast

Expecting Meghan to get different treatment seems a little naive.

I really doubt Harry cares about any past roles or he wouldn't keep dating actresses.

Yup. All royal girlfriends go through it. Not just in the UK but other royal houses as well.

AmberG · #**4610** 03-13-2017, 10:26 AM

The main problem to me is that she somehow didn't evolved as the actress, in the Suits she is also involved in some hot scenes. She is not some actress but she could invest her free time in acting courses and envolve into some serious acting, beside the Suits she has a line or two in other project. I can not belive she is satisfied with it..

miss whirley · #**4611** 03-13-2017, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlowVera

As always it is the female who must be pure as the driven snow. None of the males are held to the same standard. Barring any REAL controversy like actual nude pics I hope MM and Harry brush this silliness off their shoulders.

They aren't totally oblivious to the men. The tabloids got into a tizzy when Mike Tindall posed bare-chested and oiled-up for a charity calendar. He was "Mr. June".

Dman · #**4612** 03-13-2017, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudolph

Look at Sweden. It recently had a model marry into the family. Part of modelling means taking your clothes off. The people of Sweden are still free to make up their owns minds.

There was a lot of debate about Sofia but it turns out she appears to be popular.

I'm not sure why some people are trying to declare Meghan 'hands off'. If the British and Commonwealth public don't care Meghan is an actress, it won't be an issue.

This have nothing to do with Meghan being "hands off" but it have more to with people not understanding the differences between real and fantasy. People have to understand acting in tv shows and movies aren't real. It's totally unfair and inappropriate for people to pass judgements on her because she's pretending in tv shows and movies.

It's a total difference from real life actions.

The Sun recently had to be checked on people trying to apply scenes from Suits into a porn website.

Curryong · #**4613** 03-13-2017, 10:37 AM

There are a lot of hot scenes in many films and TV shows now. It's practically par for the course. And anyway, if Meghan marries Harry she won't need to bother about other roles, acting courses or anything else. She won't be allowed to act at all.

American Observer7 · #**4614** 03-13-2017, 10:39 AM

Why even bother to post the link here? What are you trying to do? I don't care about Meghan sex scenes. She's an actress. It's her job! So enough said. Actors and actresses do it all the time. Big deal.

Rudolph · #**4615** 03-13-2017, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dman

This have nothing to do with Meghan being "hands off" but it have more to with people not understanding the differences between real and fantasy. People have to understand acting in tv shows and movies aren't real. It's totally unfair and inappropriate for people to pass judgements on her because she's pretending in tv shows and movies.

It's a total difference from real life actions.

The Sun recently had to be checked on people trying to apply scenes from Suits into a porn website.

It was done to Cressida. You know the drill, Dman.

lilacmagnolia · #**4616** 03-13-2017, 10:42 AM

I know we aren't supposed to mention other sites BUT there is a group of 5-10 Psychos("Older Women") who are so jealous of this relationship they are sending these links to the press and they are pushing now for them to show her CSI from a decade ago as well...Ironically they showed it months ago but they want it shown again.Then it backfired on them because people are pointing out how they don't care because it's acting so they admittedly go to the sites themselves and post hateful comments since they think Meghan herself is making the positive posts like she has time for that.They have claimed she is Glenn Close's character from Fatal Attraction holding Harry hostage in this relationship...I have never seen hatred go this far and never knew it existed this way over someone else's life choice.

Dman · #**4617** 03-13-2017, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudolph

It was done to Cressida. You know the drill, Dman.

Still don't make it fair and appropriate. Judge these ladies on real life actions. If Meghan beats someone up in the street or burns a house down, then let's judge her for some inappropriate actions.

We have to grow up and understand the difference between the work of fact and the work of fiction.

lilacmagnolia · #**4618** 03-13-2017, 10:48 AM

Sorry for double posting but it's very obvious she has asked to lay off the more intimate scenes on suits and that shows she respects her relationship so they need to get off a decade old scene!

AlowVera · #**4619** 03-13-2017, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lilacmagnolia

I know we aren't supposed to mention other sites BUT there is a group of 5-10 Psychos("Older Women") who are so jealous of this relationship they are sending these links to the press and they are pushing now for them to show her CSI from a decade ago as well...Ironically they showed it months ago but they want it shown again.Then it backfired on them because people are pointing out how they don't care because it's acting so they admittedly go to the sites themselves and post hateful comments since they think Meghan herself is making the positive posts like she has time for that.They have claimed she is Glenn Close's character from Fatal Attraction holding Harry hostage in this relationship...I have never seen hatred go this far and never knew it existed this way over someone else's life choice.

Most of the comments on the usually rabid DM have been supportive of MM and the fact that she was acting...they must be dissapointed by the lack of reaction.

miss whirley · #**4620** 03-13-2017, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lilacmagnolia

I know we aren't supposed to mention other sites BUT there is a group of 5-10 Psychos("Older Women") who are so jealous of this relationship they are sending these links to the press and they are pushing now for them to show her CSI from a decade ago as well...Ironically they showed it months ago but they want it shown again.Then it backfired on them because people are pointing out how they don't care because it's acting so they admittedly go to the sites themselves and post hateful comments since they think Meghan herself is making the positive posts like she has time for that.They have claimed she is Glenn Close's character from Fatal Attraction holding Harry hostage in this relationship...I have never seen hatred go this far and never knew it existed this way over someone else's life choice.

They did the same thing to Cressida. They said that Cressida and the Yorks were forcing Harry to date her. That Cressida showed up uninvited to Harry's birthday party. That Cressida forced Harry to be pictured with her returning from Missy's wedding while wearing Harry's clothes because she wanted to send a message to Chelsy. etc

Catherine and Chelsy are also victims to some twisted royal watchers who are constantly sprouting far-fetched conspiracy theories.

None of this is new. It's a good thing this is happening now, so Meghan is getting a good view of what life with Harry will entail. It's no fairytale. The British press has well-earned it's venomous reputation.