Marengo said:
What do you mean with tons of vacations Princess_Olga? Are you referring to an article that apeared some years ago in the yellow-press (Prive if I recall correctly), who listed the holidays of the crownprincely couple. If so: 1) Most of the 'vacations' were just a weekend, 2) whatever they do in their own time is their own matter. As long as they are representing the country a fair number of times (as they are doing) I do not care how much holidays they have. 3) If that impression comes from 'Prive' I have to say that that is not the most reliable source.
yes I actually do mean the article in Prive. Like you, I typically am very sceptical when it comes to the gossip media. But in this case there should be at least an ounce of reality to that article because as it turned out years later, the magazine Prive had a well placed informant at the Palace at that time.
Or, rather, the <wife> of a well-placed servant at the palace, who had access to the Royals' personal calendars. Unbeknownst to her husband, this spouse would not only snoop into those calendars--which had all trips documented--, she would blab about them to the journalists at Prive!
This is why, for example, Prive managed to have a paparazzo waiting at the right moment on a Roman street to snap a picture of then royal fiancee Maxima Zorreguieta exiting exclusive Italian designer Valentino's store in Rome, when she was there for a fitting of her wedding dress! Before that, the public didn't know who the princess-to-be had chosen as the designer for her wedding dress, that was a well-kept secret until then!
This is how Prive was well-informed, the first years of WA and Maxima's marriage, of all the trips they took, the vacations they had, etc. Until the spouse of this royal employee was caught, that is.
Marengo said:
I think that the reason Maxima apeared less in public in the beginning of her marriage then now is simply that she did what the court anounced: orientate herself on dutch society, mosly behind the scenes. The Prince of Orange had a comparable amount of duties before his mariage to now IMO.
That's entirely possible and absolutely the most likely scenario but how are we to know for certain this was the case? I think these people are entitled to their privacy and that informant blabbing was certainly wrong wrong wrong. But all the same when they receive the exhorbitant amount from the public that they do, why shouldn't we hold these people a bit accountable, especially in the democracy that is the Netherlands, and especially for a gig that's couldn't be more nepotistic in nature?
But anyways, back to the present: WA and his spouse seem to be doing a decent enough job these days so I'm not complaining!