The qualifications rich, arrogant, spoiled are pretty subjective. What is rich, what is arrogant and what is spoiled? And what has that to do with the accusations by Ms Roberts pardon Giuffre ?
Indeed they are and that's the whole point.
Andrew has had a pretty rough time in the British press - and also the British public.
What are the odds that he won't be shredded by the American press and public?
The whole point with a jury system is that you have to overcome the bias of twelve strangers.
And this one is a classic: The little man or in this case woman, someone's daughter, who was exploited as a teen.
Against:
Some rich and no doubt spoiled foreign royal big shot, who used to hang out with some seriously shady characters. A man who hasn't come across as sincere or even convincing in his statements so far.
So yes, no matter what there are a lot of prejudices within the jury members (consciously or not) that Andrews lawyers have to overcome.
Fat chance of that happening. Especially if Andrew has to take the stand. - He may even start to perspire again, when sitting in the dock...
ADDED:
Having said that. I do not believe Andrew would be found guilty in a criminal court consisting only of professional legal minds.
Simply because it IMO cannot be proved that Andrew knew she was underage, knew she was trafficked (if she even was), knew she was a prostitute, knew she was exploited.
And without such proof, he is not proven guilty in the eyes of the law.
But a civil lawsuit... - He's toast!