sndral
Serene Highness
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2010
- Messages
- 1,239
- City
- Coastal California
- Country
- United States
Another article -Looks like one sponsor has already declined to continue association with Andrew
.
Sky News understands accountancy firm KPMG has not renewed its sponsorship of the Duke of York's Pitch@Palace initiative with the company saying it "made the decision following adverse press scrutiny around Prince Andrew"
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...-backing-for-prince-andrews-mentorship-scheme
It has seemed very bad optics to me that Andrew focused so heavily on ‘enabling young people to connect with the rich and powerful’ in his pitch at the palace scheme following his removal as trade ambassador. If the intent following the Trade removal was for him to rebrand himself, why let him focus on the very demographic Epstein targeted? I’m not suggesting any inappropriate conduct by Andrew - it just seems so clueless, wouldn’t adult veteran causes have been a more logical and less controversial choice under the circumstances?
And another controversy: https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/en...tre_pqylmel2bk8&utm_campaign=related_articles
This one about racist remarks.
I wonder how much more will surface. Palace sources have denied the story, saying Andrew wouldn’t speak like that, so I guess Andrew’s position is that this guy is lying just like Virginia.
Last edited: