I think the only reason I'd get my hands on a copy (and certainly wouldn't buy a copy) would be to see if there is actually anything negative about the Sussex's in "Endgame". So far we know Scobie has criticised - the King, Camilla, William, Catherine, Anne, Edward, Sophie. I don't think he is clued up enough (or more likely doesn't think they warrant any attention) to say anything about the Kents or Gloucesters so he has basically gone for all the working royals. And you know what - many of these stories we've heard before so it seems to me all he has really done is gathered old stories about them all and taken so new anecdotes from the Sussex's to reinforce them (fed by friends or staffers no doubt, so the couple can maintain deniability). Well if there is not any criticism of Harry and Meghan then it proves its not an accurate book in it as surely even fans would have to admit they made mistakes in their handling of their many dramas. Its evidence enough perhaps that those he seems to have the most to say about are those who H&M feel are against them - I'd love to see what is written about Andrew, or do they not want to upset Eugenie?
So, I wonder if the book is balanced and fair in its handling and the media is just choosing not to report those bits - or is Omid really not using his well honed journalistic skills at all and taking down the RF to raise up his friends.