ROYAL NORWAY
Heir Apparent
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2013
- Messages
- 3,881
- City
- somewhere
- Country
- Norway
I highly doubt it is true, but it is very damaging to him. Prince Andrew has only himself to blame for this.
This is outrageous and unbelievable !!!! I do not believe this rumor one bit !!!!! The Duchess will have his back and so will his children !!!!
Well, the girl in question was 17 at the time according to what I can find, so she was just barely underage.
Didn't we already know this ? I'm sure I remember reading about his involvement with all this a couple of years ago.
Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
He is a very foolish man whatever his involvement and his reputation which was already appalling will not recover. His daughters will also have to face the fall-out - no biggish weddings, no official roles etc as every time they appeared the story of their father's fall from grace would be there - ongoing bad PR.
How right you are, great summary !Andrew has actually been named in the lawsuit so I would expect him to be interviewed at some stage. Wouldn't he have to go to court to answer these charges? Whether or not it is true mud sticks and Andrew was photographed with Epstein after he served 18 months and is listed as a peadophile. It's his own fault he did go to parties so whether he participated or not is irrelevent he put himself in this position. I can't see some of his charities etc wanting their Patron to have these sort of allegations and I won't be surprised if he get's dumped by many especially those relating to children. And the fact that Epstein paid of some of Fergies debts isn't going to sit well with people either. Andrew needs to keep a low profile and sort this out it could get worse. If there are pictures of him at any of these parties with any young women it's going to really harm him. I think Andrew can do silly things and it's possible he did do this he might not off thought the girl was underage but a man in his forties or fifties with such a young girl is distasteful no matter who he is. The Queen will of course stand by him but this doesn't look good for Andrews future role.
Personally I'm sure Andrew won't have been involved with it himself BUT if it turns out he knew about it or saw anything then God help him in the media.
I agree.. All my comments have been about how this will affect the monarchy and such. Because we all know that him being guilty or not won't matter for his image if the damage has already been done.Wow! The only thing missing is here is the "Hanging Judge".
Please correct me if I am wrong but at this point Prince Andrew has been named in a "Civil Suit" in Florida.
He is not the Defendant.
The only substantiated information thus far is that he was a friend of Epstein.
The suit was filed in Florida where the age of consent is 18.
The alledged incidents occured in place where the age of consent is 16.
January is a slow news month.
Andrew has been found guilty by association in the Lower Court of the forum and must be excised from all royal connection, resign his charities and move to an isolated island in exile.
Whatever happened to family loyalty? Are the royal family required to distance themselves from him as a show of public righteousness? He has been accused of nothing and charged with nothing but there seems to be some confusion here as he has been all but named as a paedophile and the speed with which some forum members have grabbed this label and run with it, is downright scarey. Due process anyone? No, here it seems it's guilty until proven innocent.