Sereta
Royal Highness
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2006
- Messages
- 1,994
- City
- The
- Country
- United States
It's good to see Harry out and about even if he did get mad at the paps.
I wonder who he was with?
I wonder who he was with?
It's good to see Harry out and about even if he did get mad at the paps.
I wonder who he was with?
Prince Harry’s 26th birthday last month was expected to be a milestone of royal significance. It may not have been entirely coincidental that in the same week, he also piloted solo a £35 million RAF Apache helicopter for the first time.
The symbolism was obvious: at last, this immensely likeable young man was showing the world just how responsible and mature he can be.
But in the days since his birthday, he has revelled in at least two alcohol-fuelled nights out which have raged on until 5am.
I have worries about this young man.
Why? Since when do we put stock in what The Daily Mail says?
Why? Since when do we put stock in what The Daily Mail says?
And again.... no photos.
You make a good point about the photos. Unless we read carefully, it's a natural thing we all do--assume the photo goes with the story, when often, it doesn't. Unfortunately I tend to believe the stories, because I think it's actually suspect that we didn't hear more about Harry when he was doing his military training.I do not believe that he would risk his military future in such an incredibly stupid way, bearing in mind that most of the latest reports have been somewhat suspect as he has virtually disappeared from view during his training.
Actually I don't! We were all told that Harry wasn't the sharpest knife in the drawer by both tabloids and serious press. It goes all the way back to the disgruntled teacher whose contract at Eton was not renewed.
His basic high school results weren't enough to get into Sandhurst but Sandhurst has other ways of entry, which he was able to pass. He is also the second son of the heir to the throne and therefore a bit a leeway would be given, in my opinion, all along the line. Not that he can't necessarily do it but rather that there are standards that he hasn't quite met but those standards are actually higher than needed anyway. e.g. to get into a course means that normally you need a mark of say 80% but that doesn't mean that a mark of 70% can't do the course but that normally they require the higher mark to ensure a low drop-out rate.
The yellow press make up things all the time to fill headlines!there's no need for the Daily Mail to make up things to fill headlines.
A 'dramatised documentary' based on what would happen if Prince Harry were to be taken prisoner while serving in Afghanistan was described today as 'deeply distasteful'.
The 90-minute film includes scenes showing the prince, played by actor Sebastian Reid, being held behind enemy lines while negotiations are carried out to free him.
The Taking Of Prince Harry shows the prince at one point with an unloaded gun pointed at his face before one of his captors pulls the trigger.
A defence source said: 'The depiction, fictional or otherwise, of a member of the Armed Forces being taken hostage and mistreated is deeply distasteful.'