It appears that fans of the couple have "detected" something that may explain their choice of Archie as the first name-----apparently Archie is a "close acronym" of Rachel. Hmmmmmm.
...
As
@Mbruno points out, 'Rachel' is not an acronym of 'Archie,' although it is quite close to being an anagram of 'Archie,' except for the 'l' in Rachel and the 'i' in Archie. I'm not sure that Meghan and Harry thought about it to this extent, but perhaps they did. Quite clever if they kind of noticed that. It could be first that they just liked the sound of the name, and then from further investigation noticed the similar letters to Meghan's first name. But that doesn't have to be the case.
Did someone already post the story about the little Kiwi boy H&M met who said his name is 'Archie,' and Harry said how he liked that name?
Someone mentioned earlier that Meghan had a cat named Archie. I never knew she had a cat. Perhaps it was when she was growing up in L.A.?
Archie is not acronym of Rachel. And Meghan doesn’t use the name Rachel, not even in her wedding vows.
Meghan’s fans will just have to accept that a self-proclaimed feminist agreed to name her child “ the. Son of Harry” as in some old patriarchal Viking society. They also chose a Germanic first name ( Archibald , or Archie). Very Northern European and with little connection to Meghan’s background, which is somewhat disappointing.
Meghan's full name was definitely mentioned during the wedding ceremony, although specifically during the vows she was called 'Meghan' only.
FYI: Meghan's father is Dutch-
German and English-Irish; Meghan's mother has some European ancestry as well as African-American and Native American in her background.
I'm really not sure what particular names are supposed to denote Meghan's background, since her background is quite varied and includes a substantial European heritage.
I bet it's not too hard to find a number of African-Americans named 'Archie,' and/or 'Harrison.'
And btw, it might surprise you to discover that many of the early, ancient Vikings were dark-skinned mariners who originally hailed from the African continent.
As a (self-proclaimed) feminist I really don't see why this is a problem. Seems like people are trying to find problems where there are none.
The name isn't feminist enough (not sure what the criteria are), she gave up her career to move abroad which isn't feminist, she took her husbands last name (again not feminist). Did I miss anything? And there I was thinking feminism is about giving women a choice and chances… How silly of me.
Exactly, and thank you! Meghan herself said in an interview with Larry King in 2016 before she ever met Prince Harry:
"It's possible to be feminine and a feminist -- to embrace both."
I think that's an indication Meghan isn't at all conflicted about adhering to certain traditions, while also being herself and doing things her own way. She seems to be someone who faces the world as it is, and tries her best to remain true to herself and her own ideals, while also being flexible and willing to learn, to grow and to take on challenges.
With the Sussexes, I think we can continue to expect surprises, and perhaps seeming contradictions, that at bottom aren't contradictory at all.