The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #101  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:06 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 7,232
She is now getting into dangerous territory as far as defamation law is concerned if her story about the Palace's reaction to her suicidal thoughts proves to be untrue.


She also claimed she was essentially kept in home arrest.
__________________

  #102  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:06 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Florida, United States
Posts: 226
The fact she made the comment "It would be damaging to them" like that isn't a damaging comment.
__________________

  #103  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:07 PM
Kellydofc's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Out in the country, United States
Posts: 472
I honestly can't see how the BRF can't come out and comment on some of what has been said. I don't think there's any coming back from this for H&M. I feel really bad because I think this just tears the family apart for good.
  #104  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:07 PM
Queen Ester's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 319
Quote:
Originally Posted by moby View Post
Thanks all for the comments. I would have wanted to see if her acting deserves an award, maybe later.

I'm a nobody and I would like to think that if tomorrow someone offers me fame to be followed by fortune if only I'd air my family's problems on primetime TV, I would have the class to say no...
Meghan keeps calling the Royal Family "they" in a very derogatory way, I find that really obnoxious to call your in-laws "they",
Now, I am very curious about what Harry will say.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kellydofc View Post
I honestly can't see how the BRF can't come out and comment on some of what has been said.
They will not say anything, they will ignore the entire episode.
  #105  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:09 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 7,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommy100 View Post
Thanks Fem, I actually meant Meghan can not really be claiming that? Surely that is such a lie that is so clearly a lie she wouldn't think it would stick?

She also claimed she and Harry were married twice (the first time by the Archbishop of Canterbury three days before their actual wedding).
  #106  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:09 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 5,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess_Eleanor View Post
Archie would not be entitled to security with a title either. Beatrice and Eugenie are Princesses and don't have security. Archie, as the first child of the "spare" is actually in the same position as Beatrice. It's disgusting of her to imply that he would not get security because of his skin colour and that he is being treated differently than the rest of the family. Meghan certainly knows that Beatrice and Eugenie do not have security.

True and neither do their younger cousins Louise and James. Security has been scaled back for the Gloucesters and Kents to only when they are performing official duties.
  #107  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:09 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kellydofc View Post
I honestly can't see how the BRF can't come out and comment on some of what has been said.
I think they will have to refute some bits - the title especially- which is seems Meghan is lying out (mistaken if we want to be kind).
  #108  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:09 PM
AC21091968's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess_Eleanor View Post
Archie would not be entitled to security with a title either. Beatrice and Eugenie are Princesses and don't have security. Archie, as the first child of the "spare" is actually in the same position as Beatrice. It's disgusting of her to imply that he would not get security because of his skin colour and that he is being treated differently than the rest of the family. Meghan certainly knows that Beatrice and Eugenie do not have security.
And also Savannah Phillips, Isla Phillips, Mia Tindall, Lena Tindall, August Brooksbank and Baby Tindall do not have royal or even noble title either, despite all being great-grandchildren of The Queen. August Brooksbank is also the son of a princess. It's all under 1917's Letter Patent and 2012's amendment, it's nothing to do with race. These royal great-grandchildren are not the children of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales (The Duke of Cambridge), hence they are not style as HRH Princes/Princesses.

Even Princess Beatrice, Princess Eugenie, Lady Louise Windsor and James, Viscount Severn do not have royal security, despite they are legally HRH Princes/Princesses
  #109  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:09 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 1,392
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommy100 View Post
BBC is making out Meghan said the rules over titles were changed while she was pregnant - that can not be right??!
I'm not sure - the whole conversation about Archie's lack of title went on and on in circles - Oprah seemed to be obsessed by it, especially whether or not his skin color played a part. Meghan knew he would not become a prince until Charles becomes king. I *think* Meghan said there was a discussion about changing the rules while she was pregnant.
  #110  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:10 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Florida, United States
Posts: 226
The baby is a girl.
  #111  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:10 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Somewhere, United States
Posts: 2,134
The Duke & Duchess of Sussex - Interview with Oprah March 2021

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duchess_Watcher View Post
The fact she made the comment "It would be damaging to them" like that isn't a damaging comment.


Exactly. It is damaging period just that she said it. Meghan is throwing the whole family under the bus. Over and over again. Just the fact that she’s telling all these stories about Kate, skin tone, the psychiatrist, etc.

This interview is horrible from what I’m reading.
  #112  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:10 PM
Fem's Avatar
Fem Fem is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK, Poland
Posts: 711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kellydofc View Post
I honestly can't see how the BRF can't come out and comment on some of what has been said. I don't think there's any coming back from this for H&M. I feel really bad because I think this just tears the family apart for good.
I kind of want to go back and count how many times I was told that this interview will not change anything and the family will not be mad, that they will welcome the Sussexes with open arms. Yeah, I highly doubt that

BRF is in a tough spot. Tbh it's not a good idea to comment and not a good idea to not comment.
  #113  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:10 PM
Kellydofc's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Out in the country, United States
Posts: 472
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommy100 View Post
I think they will have to refute some bits - the title especially- which is seems Meghan is lying out (mistaken if we want to be kind).
Yes, I think they have to refute that bit at least.
  #114  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:10 PM
JessRulz's Avatar
Administrator
Blog Editor
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kellydofc View Post
I honestly can't see how the BRF can't come out and comment on some of what has been said. I don't think there's any coming back from this for H&M. I feel really bad because I think this just tears the family apart for good.
I don't think there's any chance of Harry and William repairing their relationship, at all following this. Ever.
__________________
**TRF Rules and FAQ**
  #115  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:11 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,533
Security is based on threat assessment, if ISIS made Zara Tindall their target she would be protected. Likewise many with HRH don't have police protection or vastly differing degrees of it - W&K get much more protection than Anne, Edward and Sophie who in turn get much more than the Kents and Gloucesters yet all are HRH while Beatrice and Eugenie have no official police protection anymore.
  #116  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:11 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: St Thomas, U.S. Minor Outlying Islands
Posts: 3,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaiaMia_53 View Post
But I remember Robert Jobson on a tv show after Archie was born, and the hosts were sayiing something about Archie looking like Harry. And Robert Jobson said, "Thank God!"

That is an available video to search for. I saw it on YouTube.
Can you provide the link to this video, or to an article describing it?
  #117  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:12 PM
Blog Real's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 7,080
So Meghan wants Archie to have a title for security. Meghan wants the privileges but she doesn't want the obligations?
__________________
My blogs about monarchies
  #118  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:12 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommy100 View Post
Thanks Fem, I actually meant Meghan can not really be claiming that? Surely that is such a lie that is so clearly a lie she wouldn't think it would stick?
Much of this is very clearly untrue - it does not seem to matter.
  #119  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:12 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Florida, United States
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by JessRulz View Post
I don't think there's any chance of Harry and William repairing their relationship, at all following this. Ever.

Totally agree. It's damaged forever. And it's sad he let a woman come between he/his family.

I don't care what anyone says: They should act to remove their titles and remove Harry from the line of succession.
  #120  
Old 03-07-2021, 09:12 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Unspecified, United States
Posts: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alisa View Post
It is widely known that Charles has plans for a more scaled down monarchy when he becomes King.

It makes sense that Charles insists that Archie not get a title now and in the future.
Well he got his scaled down monarchy.
__________________

Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Duke & Duchess of Sussex with Oprah III - Post-Interview, March 9th 2021 - Marengo The Electronic Domain 746 03-12-2021 05:30 AM




Popular Tags
america american archie mountbatten-windsor asian baby names biography birth britain britannia british royal family british royals buckingham palace camilla camilla parker-bowles camilla parker bowles carolin china chinese ming dynasty asia asian emperor royalty qing colorblindness coronation doge of venice dresses duchess of sussex duke of cambridge duke of sussex edward vii family life family tree gemstones george vi gradenigo hello! henry viii hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume highgrove history hochberg house of windsor hypothetical monarchs king juan carlos liechtenstein list of rulers medical meghan markle monarchist movements monarchists monarchy mongolia mountbatten names nara period plantinum jubilee pless politics portugal prince charles of luxembourg prince harry princess eugenie queen elizabeth ii queen louise queen victoria royal ancestry royalty of taiwan solomon j solomon spanish royal family sussex suthida unfinished portrait united states of america wales


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:11 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises
×