Search results

Ok. Well you mods are always stressing the rules of sticking to royalty and not politics. Where in the rules does it state that if a majority of posters (but who said that most of them feel this way anyway) want a certain topic they can keep it. You mods are always stressing this rules. Yet...

I did not refer to a person as being crass, etc. I said this as in this situation. But you are not only a fellow member, an administrator, you are using your power as a moderator for your own convenience. ANd it isn't right.

Look again, I am not trying to start a fight. But how long do you guys plan to talk about this GG stuff-in the British Royal Family forum?? COme on this isn't hard. Posters on here try really hard to abide by the rules, but the GG has become an exception. This is too crass-no make that stupid...

Yep. In the British Royal Family Forum. I think I'll start a thread on Tony Blair. He is the Queen's representative of something isn't he.

But you see that is it. Canadians have her as a head of state (as well as others) and you have a GG who is a representative and you guys get to talk about domestic politics! It doesn't bother me that you guys do, but it is just odd that this gets allowed in the BRF forum. Gosh with the thread on...

It is not the politics that bothers me (it is really interesting to learn this stuff about canada cuz I woudl otherwise not care). It is just hta I come to the BRF thread and I see this. It is just so odd.

Now come on. I was not bullying. I just made one statement and I was primarily joking around. ANyway, if you read the title for this thread, it says British Royals aka The British Royal Family. The GG is not a member of the British Royal Family so this thread does not belong here. Second...

I am starting to think that CPMAxima is not the most popular CP on here. Not that she is not liked, but I guess not as interesting? But I would love to hear her talk about economics more.

It is reality that ppl marry for money and alot of times not for the heart. This is what keeps the money rollin'. Of course ppl would like to think rosy thoughts about how ppl woudl follow their heart and insides, but reality is that there is sooo much pressure to sustain one's position in high...

Thank you. I did not mean to sound mean. It's just that they were talking about canadian stuff in the BRForums and outsiders don't get to talk about that in the other threads. The GG is indeed a special entity that you Canadians cherish. I have learned so much. (But I still can't figure you guys...

Yeah and is he in the line of succession?

Wow. You canadians have gotten away w/ so much on this thread. How nauseating it is to hear so much of what is going on in canada when it is not related to real royalty!

I wonder do they have any kids?

What a beautiful dress. It was very well coordinated. I also love it strapless-uniform and beautiful!

It's so sad that the Queen had to move out of her own home. COuldn't the second wife go somewhere else? But at least she will never be divorced.

Well I guess history has repeated itself. But I wonder to what extent, especially in regards to titles and styles, etc. As grecka pointed out, the grand ducal family should act in a catholic way. So maybe there will be a stripping of princely titles and a demotion, etc. I Kind of hope this...

What's up with ALexandre?

She should be resting. At least two weeks would be great. But I guess she's still got that journalist spirit in her of getting to work already.

Wow!!! She is seating in the Queen's throne. That is way cool. ALthoguh it would have been nice if she had worn something more formal, but she looked cute anyway. And it is so cool she got her coat-of-arms. I think she shoudl get a crown as well.

Don't alot of royals have alot of patronages under their belts? After the divorce doesn't it seem logical that Diana would have to drop most of those patronages to get her life in order? WHat is wrong with some of you? Use soem common sense and stop conjuring up these crass conspiracy...

SOmetimes ppl do immoral things, but they are not necessarily immoral. It is conscioustly repeating those things and not learning from them that is immoral. So I don't think Louis and Tessy are immoral. They've just got alot to learn. Louis better think long and hard b/f he decides to marry...

But you see sexual matters entails alot more than sex: having a baby out of wedlock, the hgh chance of emotional, mental, physical scars if the relationship does not work out, disease, etc. I think that preaching against fornication/adultery is important b/c there are so many consequences that...

Well I like Diana b/c she was a survivor and a strong person even in the face of all she went through. She made alot of mistakes and had to grow up alot, but at the end of her life she was a more mature and level person. Also she learned to forgive ppl who had trespassed against her. She learned...

Maybe they'll remarry much later on.

I just want to know if anyone is going to lose/not gain a royal title and status.