As today's newspaper isn't online yet, I can give the timeline of the Museum's directors: first of April 2004 the previous director got sacked (for serious mistakes, possibly the French equivalent of mismanagement?) Before that, there was already a lot of upheaval since the beginning of the year. The secretary general played for temp director for three months and after him the Jean Jaubert took over. And he resigned per 30 May, so he's been there for slightly less than 3 years.
But the succession is imminent...
Mr. Jaubert isn't allowed to give comment, the secretary general claims it's for personal reasons. But it seems that Mr. Jaubert has sent an email to the Museum's personnel, saying he doesn't agree with the administrative council of the Museum. (He had an interesting plan, IMO)
The rest of the article goes on about problems between the direction in Paris and in Monaco and the director general. The standard bureaucratic problems, the one who has the power doesn't know what's going on and the one who knows what's going on, doesn't have the power.
It seems that two candidates for the post have already been selected and presented to Albert (yes, still on topic) last week. It is possible that a definitive decision might be made during the meeting of the administrative council in Paris on the 9th of July.
I think that might be one of Albert's biggest problems. Clarity is generally preferable to insecurity, speculation and doubt (remember Albert's inthronisation speech: honesty and all that) but he deliberately keeps things fuzzy. So things happily fester along.
The Charlene situation is a good example, there are more but my brain isn't awake yet.