MARG
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2005
- Messages
- 10,599
- City
- Christchurch
- Country
- New Zealand
I always feel a little uneasy about "sources". They always have a lot to say but are never willing to disclose their identity, and to me, the anonymous accuser is given free reign and endless publicity with absolutely no verification.
Is it a friend? An acquaintence? Or, is it the result of a fertile mind. A person who has followed Charles interests and has convinced themself that they need to "expose" him because they believe that he will continue on (politically) as he has as POW or is it just a blind, to cover the actual author . . . the journalist.
Is it a friend? An acquaintence? Or, is it the result of a fertile mind. A person who has followed Charles interests and has convinced themself that they need to "expose" him because they believe that he will continue on (politically) as he has as POW or is it just a blind, to cover the actual author . . . the journalist.
Last edited: