smdouglas
Nobility
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2002
- Messages
- 252
- City
- Paso Robles
- Country
- United States
monaco70s said:What I could see was about his participation on a summit in Warsaw.
You need to click on Journal Officiel to get the latest news.
monaco70s said:What I could see was about his participation on a summit in Warsaw.
Thank you for pointing out what I had already said. I was trying to figure out why they weren't able to read it the link worked for me.smdouglas said:You need to click on Journal Officiel to get the latest news.
Anyone interested Albert has been a little busy with work if they go to this site you can do some reading. http://www.monaco.gouv.mc/PortGb. Go to Journal Officiel. Its in French you will need to translate. Easy enough done just type in translator on your tool bar and you should find one that suits you.
hsh1969 said:Hi to all:
I've been reading and reading, and the more I read the less I understand, but EVERYTHING THAT I WILL WRITE IN HERE IS MINE OPINION, THE THEME IS HALF SERIOUS & HALF JOKINGLY, TAKE IT WITH A GRAIN O 2 POUNDS OF SALT SINCE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT MONACO AND THIS IS AN ESPECULATIVE FORUM AL RIGHT?
So have you notice:
1. that both of the kids were born prematurely and there are no records of such premature births?
where these women went to give birth in the woods?
2. both women have been fighting to have PAII to recognized the children?
but there are no records, suspicious DNA's test/pictures, birth certificates that get lost, no info as to premature babies, both of the women were coming from a too recent divorce/breakup.
3. how deep is the "concern" of these mothers about their kids and only the kids ?
Tamara: before she gave birth she was ignored, once the baby was born, both were ignore, she followed Albert around the States to have him see/recognized the child, both were ignored again. Try the Courts she lost the case and she was ignored. Nevertheless she goes ahead names the girl with the "grandma's" name and "family"
name, nobody bat an eye (ignored again). Keeping the "fight for the rights" of her daughter, she went into half reclusion. In one of the links provided in this forum I read, she is divorcing now, lives with the girl in a gated community, the two of them almost (as the neighbors said) lived very privately and don't to talk to anybody.
Regarding the "rights of her daughter" because of course that is what she is fighting for: if I have a baby with an important/rich/prominent person and after all she has done to herself and dragging the baby around, you should stop and think do I really want him as a father of my child? We have been ignored batlanty again and again, does my child deserves to have his last name? and it is worth it to have the baby grow under a shadow of being not recognized, not wanted and ignored? and yes go ahead a plastered in the media.
Don't you all think that her fight for "the rights" of the girl has gone way too far?
Would you put your kid thru all the ordeal of being ignored again and again?
Is have your daughter recognized is that important when you have shown that can take care of the baby mighty right? BTW as millions and millions of women do it everyday.
That girl is a teenager now and every time her mother tries again to have her recognized she is being rejected. Now do you remember when we were teenager how thirsty of validation/recognition/ love we were? Some of us have a share of broken promises, abandonment by parents or they die.
So my prayers goes to the girl because dispite of the intentions of her mother, she still is being rejected and not wanted. I don't feel to much simpathy for Tamara, even as single mother she had in her power to put her daughter first, change her last name, let her have a normal life and if in the future she wants to go ahead and confront her "father" as a daughter she will be in all her right.
(Got a feeling when I read that Ms Tamara was getting divorce at this time, that this situation has consumed a lot of her life. IMO)
Now with Nicole: this is a woman that does not know the term :let go"
go back if you might and see the pictures again, especially the one that she is wrapped around Al, she is looking at the camera and her face is almost challenging like: his is mine" kind of look, i don't see the "love" anywhere she does not look in love, he looks the same way he looks in all the pictures, then look at the furniture or decor of the apartment, does that gives the impression of "luxurious" to any of you. look at the bed and window, what do you see? Just food for thought.
And the same question comes to mind: Do you want that kind of father for your son? As she states he has not seen the baby since February, I mean even if his father was ill how difficult will be for Al jump in a plane and go and see his son, after all they lived in Paris not in the Antartic.
I have a few more "points" but I got to go.
As I stated at the begining this is just an opinion, full of facts, half facts, gossip and especulation, which is all the forum is about.
I'll be back with more points
have a nice weekend
There are 45 more days before Albert can say anything publicly.semisquare said:lillia
u make perfect sense. for some people attention is attention. it doesn't matter if its the good kind of attention or the bad kind. dont u think she is the last person on earth albert would have another relationship with? i think so.
LadyMacAlpine said:There are 45 more days before Albert can say anything publicly.
dreed777 said:I have a question that maybe someone can answer. I understand that he can't say anything publicly during the mourning period. What I don't understand is how they could say that he was going to be taking legal action, or whatever it was they said, and about how hurt he was. Isn't that a public response by his attorneys? I guess I just don't understand the difference. If they said what they said, why couldn't they just say whether he is the father or his intentions or whatever? (I'm not sure my question is very clear.)
semisquare said:lillia
u make perfect sense. for some people attention is attention. it doesn't matter if its the good kind of attention or the bad kind. dont u think she is the last person on earth albert would have another relationship with? i think so.
Alisa said:Here's a recent photo that I found yesterday of Miss Coste and Alexandre. Dated 5-18-05..
leahteresa said:I also think he should keep his mouth shut about all of it, even after the mourning period is over. If he comes out and says something, she retalitates...and on and on. It's almost like he is sinking to her level. But that's just my two cents.
i wonder if she is happy now, since the cat is out the bag. and she will be follow by the media. my advice, always dress nice even when u r going to the grocery store.Here's a recent photo that I found yesterday of Miss Coste and Alexandre. Dated 5-18-05.
semisquare said:i wonder if she is happy now, since the cat is out the bag. and she will be follow by the media. my advice, always dress nice even when u r going to the grocery store.
michelleq said:I have now sympathy for her! But maybe I missed something, where are her other children? Or is this child the "Cash Cow"? (No slur to the child at all intended).
leahteresa said:Hey all, enjoyed the posts....I like opinions and like eveyone...I got one....Purely speculation on my part...In the interview Al. did on Larry King I distictly remember him saying, when the time comes I'll do my duty, as a reference to marriage and an heir. It also came out that his father didn't like any of his girlfriends (maybe) and he is planning to marry after his fathers death. I sort of think he has a couple women in mind, not Nicole, and Nicole knows it. I mean, if they met in 1997 and she's been around 5 years (I think that's what I read) and he last saw the baby in February....is it not possible that he has been seeing other women and that this "relationship/love child" revelation might really go to hurting his potential or actual relationship/s with other women?"
Makes sense to me; I hope he puts this matter in court so neither of them can speak about it publically anymore. That's just my opinion. I also hope that if it is his son, if he does visit the boy again, he does it very apart from the mother. I do not wish ill for her in any way, but in my opinion, he need not further encourage her with his presence. It could be better to help her let go and find someone else to love. I would be surprised if he marries/takes up with her again. Again, all this is just my opinion, which means nothing.
I saw in a magazine (le Pointe) that claims she spoke to them on this issue of her attending the funeral mass;
"Parce que moi, j’ai perdu ma mère lorsue j’attendais mon fils aîné, et cela a été une très grande douleur. J'ai pensé que si je venais à cette messe Albert pourrait me regarder de temps à autre et à travers moi il verrait son fils, il verrait que la vie continue. Et puis les funérailles de Ranier, c’est l’enterrement du grand-père de mon fils, tout de même.”
In my opinion, this at first sounds like a noble enough reason; but then again, if he has already made it clear by his action to her that he has not want communication/contact with her (I guess, I do not know), I do not understand this all of this thinking.
Again, I am no expert but it sounds a little like the response of somebody gives if they are determined to try to make a connection to another person no matter what the occasion.
I don't know. But at least I found the answer to my question of why she strongly needed to go to this funeral. (I admit it; I guess I have nothing better to do at the moment).
.ps to semisquare: just people from monaco were allowed to see the laid in state prince rainer
when in rome do what the romans do, so she is not in her country.In another article (german newspaper) Nicole claims, that she wanted to got to the funeral, because in the country where she's from, it's "tradition" - they have a very strong family company - and because Alexandre is Alberts only son - and this is very important in her culture.
i agree , it dosen't make sense to do such a thingI don't really understand the point to bring such a young child to see a person laying in state even it is his grand-father who he doesn't know anyway. It's really pointless and can even be traumatic for the child.
semisquare said:finally, some new posts
i too would like to add that as an black american i am an equal opportunity disser. both acted poorly but the fact remains that albert and nicole had an agreement. which was for albert to announce he has a child by nicole. does it make sense to jump ahead of that aggrement? their is at least one photo of nicole and the child(i forgot his name) out on the street. by she not showing patience she now has photographers
following her trying to get the special photo. think about it