"Spare" memoir by the Duke of Sussex (2023)


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
In the absence of new information about this book, this thread will remain closed.

Normal news about the duke and duchess will be discussed in their own thread in the Sussex forum.

Please send me a PM if there are new developments.
 
Last edited:
Courtney Cox has addressed the mushrooms in her fridge from Harry’s memoir Spare according to variety saying “I definitely was not passing them out” and “I am not saying there were mushrooms”. If this shouldn’t be here, can someone move to this to the “spare” thread
 
An article by Harry's ghostwriter, JR Moehringer, on Spare:

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...y-memoir-spare

Did he had a ghostwriter to write this article, too? I thought I would read notes and other material that didn't make it on the book. Instead, I get this ghostwriter practically mimicking the same exact behavior we see in the Sussex couple: self-congratulatory from start to end and name-dropping catalog to let us know how important he is as a ghost writer.

I got nothing out to tell me who he really is and had the impression the article was more a marketing device for him to get more celebrities to call him for bios. This ghostwriting all reminds me of the anecdote of Gertrude Stein telling her friend, Alice B Toklas since she didn't write her biography Getrude wrote it for her and had the audacity, and humor, to call it The Auto biography of Alice B. Toklas.

Ghost writers like the one Harry used are what Editors used to do, add spice and sensationalism so the book sells. But is the same as if someone's life was adapted for TV or a movie, you don't get the truth but a distort on events to make them seem cinematic. I prefer to see Harry telling his story live, he is funny, a train wreck but funny. And at least I know I see him for real and not with a ghost writer changing his words in paper.
 
Last edited:
JR Moehringer is the same ghostwriter who worked with Andre Agassi on his memoir "Open" and Nike's Phil Knight "Shoe Dog". JR Moehringer's own 2005 memoir "The Tender Bar" was recently made into a movie directed by George Clooney.
 
Last edited:
Not a very pleasant article. Think less off him now even given how well Agassi’s book was received.
 
Totally unimpressed. What was the point of this ?

To me, Moehringer comes off as unlikable as Harry. I notice in this self serving Article, how he himself takes swipes at The Family, AGAIN.

As if Spare didn't try do enough damage......
 
The problem with ghostwriters is that they sometimes want to take over the book, the message and the contents.

This was a really juicy book for a ghostwriter!
I'm not the least bit surprised Moehringer wanted to take control of the book. After all this book may very well define his career for better or worse. So this better work!
And if Harry can't string three coherent sentences together, hasn't analyzed a book since connecting dots in kindergarten and - I strongly suspect - is not even clear about the purpose of the book himself, then he's got a seriously frustrated ghostwriter on his hands! Who, rather than assisting Harry, is trying to take control.
Well, the book didn't work, so now Moehringer is out pointing the finger at Harry. Explaining everybody and their grandmother that Harry' autobiography would have been great if it hadn't been for Harry...

So when I translate Moehringer's incoherent ramblings that are quoted here I get: Listen!! What's your bl**dy message, Harry? Do you even have a message at all? I'm trying to help you! - You are ruining my career, you babbling 'nuffsaid, you!
 
But in the final part he describes how they had a huge celebratory party when the book had come out - so, even though the reviews were detrimental, they celebrated because Harry finally got his word out ('the truth' in his words but Harry normally says it is 'his truth' which while illogical more clearly indicates that it is his perception/recollection coming from his current state of mind) and it was selling like crazy.

The ghostwriter even tries to explain his tweets in which he explained how (Harry's) memory was faulty but that it never was intended suggest that because of it, it might not be completely true...

And I wonder how long his visits to California took - that he missed his family so much that Meghan needed to console him with lots of food on her daily afternoon walk with Archie to the guesthouse they had prepared for him.
 
Well, it's hardly surprising they celebrated when the book was published. It was after all a major project being finished and a substantial sum of money in the account.
Not to mention that it would hopefully boost Moehringer's career a lot and in all sorts of ways.

As for Harry's "truth." It may begin to make sense. In the sense that Harry didn't understand that the book is about whatever Harry wanted to present. A kind of truth so to speak.
I think that is evident in the quotes about the interrogation officer and Diana.
Where Harry wanted to include a smart comeback to the interrogation officer that he, Harry, was proud of. But which Moehringer wanted to omit, because it conflicted with the message of the book. That Harry has suffered all his life due to the death of his mother, also in the hands of this evil interrogation officer. So an intelligent/cheeky reply from Harry would make the reader feel less sorry for Harry. I.e. spoil the whole message. - So that reply being omitted became not "the truth" but "a truth."
And in that context a faulty memory is not that important. The important thing is the "overall truth" about the message and the version Harry wished to present.

I also feel that there were times where Moehringer either gave up or wasn't competent.
Harry's devotion to his penis and it's friends for example. Okay, one anecdote by "Harry the Lad" okay. But entire paragraphs?!? That's where Moehringer should have gone in and said: You are so much not writing more about your d*ck!
I also think Moehringer failed, or gave up, whatever in the chapter where Harry talked about being nasty to an employee at the school. Having an entire book devoted to how mean everybody have been to Harry and then include an anecdote where Harry happily and unconcerned talks about being mean to a person in a subservient position. That's either a major flaw by the ghostwriter or Moehringer simply put his hands up: Fair enough, we'll include it, but I've warned you!
 
Last edited:
Great points Muhler.

Does anyone really think this Book did Harry's reputation any favors ? I don't. Just the opposite in fact. Why, why is Moehringer rehashing this ?

To me, Spare, under this Ghost Writer, revealed a deeply troubled and insecure Man, who was fixated on lashing out at his father, brother and stepmother, (amongst others) for not giving him the recognition and respect that he feels he deserved. The Book is filled with many, to many, cheap shots and bitter jealousy recriminations. Like Harry believing he was born ONLY in case William needed *something*....

"I was SUMMONED to provide backup, distraction, and if necessary a spare part". Didn't Moehringer realize that makes Harry sound not just jealous, but mentally unstable. Or didn't Moehringer care ?

Couldn't Moehringer see the pitfalls and dangers to Harry's reputation and quest to be a 'Global figure' with the cheap, demeaning TMI, to much information revelations in Spare ? Dragging in others, disrespecting their privacy (not just his Family) with stories about being offered drugs at Courtney Cox's House......Losing his virginity to a "friend".....attacking his own RPO ? Killing Taliban ?

Either Moehringer took a hit to his professional reputation or he's trying to gin up interest in himself.

In any case both He and Harry made a giant bundle of money, BUT the damage to Harry's reputation with Spare and the Interviews to promote it ? I think are incalculable.
 
Last edited:
I was interested to see that Moehringer never seemed to really question Harry’s version of events. It made me wonder if he did any research into the Royal Family independent of speaking with Harry.
 
the ghost writer is there to write up what Harry says, not to edit it or make H sound good bad or indifferent. If H wants to say mean things about his brother or stuff about his penis, then the writer writes it down and makes it sound coherent....
 
the ghost writer is there to write up what Harry says, not to edit it or make H sound good bad or indifferent. If H wants to say mean things about his brother or stuff about his penis, then the writer writes it down and makes it sound coherent....

The ghostwriter is there to help, make the book readable, interesting and first foremost help in getting the message across. Otherwise you can just hire an good secretary.
The ghostwriter is also there to help avoid pitfalls, avoid loosing obvious future lawsuits and prevent the main person from saying something too stupid. So a good ghostwriter is not only a good author but also a first class editor as well.
Especially if the person the book is about has no experience in writing books.

But more importantly this wasn't just any autobiography. This was the culmination of a longer very public feud within the BRF, that few outsiders really understood (just look at the threads here at TRF!) so the interest was ginormous!
This is a make or break book for a ghostwriter.

So yes, the ghostwriter can say: I only stringed together what I was told to put in the book.
But if I was Harry, the client, I can say: You screwed up! This book made more damage to my reputation, than good. You didn't do your job, you didn't advise me.
 
Totally unimpressed. What was the point of this ?

To me, Moehringer comes off as unlikable as Harry. I notice in this self serving Article, how he himself takes swipes at The Family, AGAIN.

As if Spare didn't try do enough damage......

I'm struggling to see where Moehringer "takes swipes" at The Family. Are you referring to the two sentences about the family's motto of "Never complain, never explain"? Two sentences out of a very long essay?

Someone has to be awfully thin-skinned to react to such light criticism. More over, this is not new! Many people have commented on the family's "stocism" in the past before Harry's book, so this seems more of an observation rather than a true critique.
 
Harry's ghostwriter JR Moehringer has been a successful and prolific journalist, novelist, and screenwriter for over 3 decades. Three of his books have been turned into movies including his own 2005 memoir. He is well known within the literary world, a graduate of Yale '86, a Pulitzer Prize in 2000, and a fellowship from Harvard 2001. He is also known for Ghostwriting memoirs. Despite all the controversy surrounding Spare it sold more than 3.2 million copies worldwide after just one week of publication and will likely rank among the bestselling memoirs of all time. It's been translated into 15 languages.
https://www.latimes.com/entertainme...memoir-spare-sells-millions-copies-first-week
 
Harry's ghostwriter JR Moehringer has been a successful and prolific journalist, novelist, and screenwriter for over 3 decades. Three of his books have been turned into movies including his own 2005 memoir. He is well known within the literary world, a graduate of Yale '86, a Pulitzer Prize in 2000, and a fellowship from Harvard 2001. He is also known for Ghostwriting memoirs. Despite all the controversy surrounding Spare it sold more than 3.2 million copies worldwide after just one week of publication and will likely rank among the bestselling memoirs of all time. It's been translated into 15 languages.
https://www.latimes.com/entertainme...memoir-spare-sells-millions-copies-first-week

Thank you for such informative post. Moehringer is a very good writer and this essay makes me want to check out his other work.

Also, is anyone to going to talk about the harassment that Moehringer received at the hands of British tabloids?

Moehringer's contract gave him the right to remain anonymous, but someone leaked that info which in my view is very wrong and a clear invasion of his privacy.

By stalking this innocent civilian, the British tabloid once again expose themselves as the scum that they are and making Harry's point for him.
 
Owl Branch, sorry to disagree, but to me there was no reason for Moehringer to bring the Royal Family into this ridiculous Article anyway. Even obliquely. But, he knew what would get attention. Mention The Royal Family.
It was a cheap shot in my opinion.

I also think that Spare didn't do Moehringer's reputation any favors either.

Oh, Muhler, nailed it again with your latest comment ! I bet down the line The Sussex's will regret utilizing Moehringer as Harry's ghost writer.
 
Last edited:
Harry's ghostwriter JR Moehringer has been a successful and prolific journalist, novelist, and screenwriter for over 3 decades. Three of his books have been turned into movies including his own 2005 memoir. He is well known within the literary world, a graduate of Yale '86, a Pulitzer Prize in 2000, and a fellowship from Harvard 2001. He is also known for Ghostwriting memoirs. Despite all the controversy surrounding Spare it sold more than 3.2 million copies worldwide after just one week of publication and will likely rank among the bestselling memoirs of all time. It's been translated into 15 languages.
https://www.latimes.com/entertainme...memoir-spare-sells-millions-copies-first-week

Well yeah, he was clearly a good choice with his CV, but even with a different ghost writer, it was obviously going to sell loads of copies anyway.

As I've said in a previous post, it doesn't follow that a best selling book is better than books that sell less copies; it's a matter of public interest and demand, I suppose. So if, for example, nearly 100 years ago a ghost writer had hung out with Bonnie & Clyde while they were on the run and written a book with them (perhaps someone did! I don't know), it would have sold like hot cakes at the time then dropped away. Whereas The Great Gatsby by F Scott Fitzgerald and published in 1925 only sold 25,000 copies in his lifetime, but has since sold 25 million copies.

Will Spare ever be considered a "great" book like Gatsby? Will it sell 25 million copies over the next 100 years? I don't think so. Time will tell.
 
Last edited:
Shady Lady, yep. Its all about the "test of time".

Spare VERY MUCH reminds me of Kitty Kelley's " tell all " books of the 80 and 90's. On The Windsors, Frank Sinatra, Nancy Reagan, Elizabeth Taylor, ect...

Barbara Walters said Kitty's books "are more focused on the salacious, rather than the factual content" . I see the same here.

I'm still waiting to find out about Harry's "hard won wisdom" that Spare promised too.....
 
Last edited:
...Also, is anyone to going to talk about the harassment that Moehringer received at the hands of British tabloids?

Moehringer's contract gave him the right to remain anonymous, but someone leaked that info which in my view is very wrong and a clear invasion of his privacy.

By stalking this innocent civilian, the British tabloid once again expose themselves as the scum that they are and making Harry's point for him.

If it happened as JRM says, I'm not surprised, especially with the Mail who I do not have a high opinion of, but to be fair we don't know if the person taking photos at the school was British.

Presumably The Guardian, who switched to tabloid format in 2018, and is considered by some (myself included) as such here in the UK, but considers itself to have a superior moral compass - as well as being anti-Royal - would not have dreamed of doing such a thing:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...hringer-says-pair-bonded-over-media-intrusion

At the end of the day journalists are going to follow a lead if they are given it and do their job as they see fit, however unscrupulous it may seem. JRM isn't the first person to have an unwelcome knock on his door (or window) and won't be the last. Perhaps it happens more in the UK than it does in the US (I'm not familiar with US privacy laws either).

The real culprit is surely the person who leaked the info to the press in the first place. It must have been someone who was either known and trusted by Sussexes, or employed by a company they put their trust in; they let the cat out of the bag, so to speak, and knew what would happen when they did.

Note: Edited to clarify my description and personal perception of the Guardian ?
 
Last edited:
Presumably The Guardian, which is considered a tabloid here in the UK but considers itself to have a superior moral compass (as well as being anti-Royal) and who have published this piece today, would not have dreamed of doing such a thing:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...hringer-says-pair-bonded-over-media-intrusion

"Considers" being the operative word, given that The Guardian has just been forced to issue an apology for printing anti-Semitic cartoons. Have a superior moral compass it assuredly does not!

I don't know why Moehringer's rehashing things, unless it's just to get publicity.
 
If it happened as JRM says, I'm not surprised, especially with the Mail who I do not have a high opinion of, but to be fair we don't know if the person taking photos at the school was British.

Presumably The Guardian, which is considered a tabloid here in the UK but considers itself to have a superior moral compass (as well as being anti-Royal) and who have published this piece today, would not have dreamed of doing such a thing:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...hringer-says-pair-bonded-over-media-intrusion

At the end of the day journalists are going to follow a lead if they are given it and do their job as they see fit, however unscrupulous it may seem. JRM isn't the first person to have an unwelcome knock on his door (or window) and won't be the last. Perhaps it happens more in the UK than it does in the US (I'm not familiar with US privacy laws either).

The real culprit is surely the person who leaked the info to the press in the first place. It must have been someone who was either known and trusted by Sussexes, or employed by a company they put their trust in; they let the cat out of the bag, so to speak, and knew what would happen when they did.

Well know benefitted from leaking thst information?

The Guardian is not a tabloid.
 
"Spare" memoir by the Duke of Sussex (2023)

An article by Harry's ghostwriter, JR Moehringer, on Spare:

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...y-memoir-spare



To me the biggest takeaway was Harry saying he enjoyed getting his ghostwriter all worked up. That told me a lot about Harry. None of it good. I wonder who else that applies to. Hmmm…..

I do think it’s interesting he talks about being “exasperated” with Harry. I believe it.
 
Last edited:
"Considers" being the operative word, given that The Guardian has just been forced to issue an apology for printing anti-Semitic cartoons. Have a superior moral compass it assuredly does not!

I don't know why Moehringer's rehashing things, unless it's just to get publicity.

Well said! :flowers: Thank you for mentioning this (as a person with Jewish ancestors and close loved ones, I found it particularly appalling).

As for JRM’s article appearing now, timed to follow on from the coronation perhaps? It was always inevitable JRM was going to experience press attention sooner or later, as he’s acknowledged in Spare as collaborator; drawing attention to it now in his article lends support to the the guy whose book just made him a lot of money (and the possibility of more if there’s a sequel), and who just happens to hate the press and is taking them to court. There’s a lot of quid pro quo-ing going on there IMO.

To me the biggest takeaway was Harry saying he enjoyed getting his ghostwriter all worked up. That told me a lot about Harry. None of it good. I wonder who else that applies to. Hmmm…..

I do think it’s interesting he talks about being “exasperated” with Harry. I believe it.

I noticed that too. And thought exactly the same thing!
 
Last edited:
The Guardian is not a tabloid in the slightest. True, they have a checkered history with being "leftist" and the antisemitism that used to be intertwined with that. I will say though that they lean into tabloid-y type reporting when it comes to the royals. However, I believe they do this on purpose to diminish the royals and make the point that they are not worthy of "serious" reporting.

The experts from the ghostwriter are interesting, but there is nothing surprising in his revelations about Harry i.e. score settler, insecure, antagonistic, and exacerbating. But its important to not lose the point that despite these characteristics he still connected with Harry. I'm glad the ghostwriter is getting some publicity - he really did a lot of heavy lifting with this memoir and is very talented.
 
The ghostwriter is there to help, make the book readable, interesting and first foremost help in getting the message across. Otherwise you can just hire an good secretary.
The ghostwriter is also there to help avoid pitfalls, avoid loosing obvious future lawsuits and prevent the main person from saying something too stupid. So a good ghostwriter is not only a good author but also a first class editor as well.
Especially if the person the book is about has no experience in writing books.

But more importantly this wasn't just any autobiography. This was the culmination of a longer very public feud within the BRF, that few outsiders really understood (just look at the threads here at TRF!) so the interest was ginormous!
This is a make or break book for a ghostwriter.

So yes, the ghostwriter can say: I only stringed together what I was told to put in the book.
But if I was Harry, the client, I can say: You screwed up! This book made more damage to my reputation, than good. You didn't do your job, you didn't advise me.

In the end, though, the ghostwriter’s job is to hand over a coherent piece of writing that comes as close as possible to the subject’s authentic voice. This project would have been challenging, because I don’t think Harry would have come to him with any sort of rough draft, or anything written down at all. So the ghostwriter was responsible for everything from sentence and paragraph structure to overarching themes. The argument about what to include in the story of Harry and the fake terrorists shows that the ghostwriter was thinking of what worked best for the book while Harry was focusing on showing himself in the best light.

I think both Harry and the ghostwriter have reasons to not be completely happy with the book. It was always going to be a commercial success. But, as you say, the book didn’t help Harry’s image. And, while parts of it were engaging, the book wasn’t at the level I’d expect from someone who enjoys the reputation of being a very good (ghost)writer.
 
In the end, though, the ghostwriter’s job is to hand over a coherent piece of writing that comes as close as possible to the subject’s authentic voice. This project would have been challenging, because I don’t think Harry would have come to him with any sort of rough draft, or anything written down at all. So the ghostwriter was responsible for everything from sentence and paragraph structure to overarching themes. The argument about what to include in the story of Harry and the fake terrorists shows that the ghostwriter was thinking of what worked best for the book while Harry was focusing on showing himself in the best light.

I think both Harry and the ghostwriter have reasons to not be completely happy with the book. It was always going to be a commercial success. But, as you say, the book didn’t help Harry’s image. And, while parts of it were engaging, the book wasn’t at the level I’d expect from someone who enjoys the reputation of being a very good (ghost)writer.

Indeed.

I suspect that Moehringer ended up not only being the ghostwriter, but also the editor, biographer, interviewer, legal advisor and PR-advisor.
Because when people want to write an autobiography, they usually have a pretty good idea about the tone of the book and what they want to include, include occasional stabs at someone if need be - and certainly what they don't want in the book.
Or the autobiography is "ordered" because the person is somehow relevant right now. That's usually a simple routine job. My favorite example being the Page-3 model Maria Whittaker who back in the 80s at the age of seventeen had her autobiography written and that included a whole chapter devoted to her budgie, no kidding!
Anyway, since I doubt Harry (or Meghan) came with anything resembling a draft or even a clear idea what message he really wanted to send and present himself in - it would have been left to Moehringer to basically do the whole thing himself. Everything! - And as we can gather between the lines Harry would at times have been difficult to work with, sometimes even provocative. So Moehringer may sometimes have felt that he wasted his time and talent - and with a deadline moving ever closer.

Now, Moehringer may be a brilliant ghostwriter, but that does not mean that he is a brilliant biographer, let alone a researcher, which may explain the odd inconsistencies that have been pointed out in this book as well as conflicting timelines. Moehringer simply didn't check or didn't have time to check, or didn't bother or didn't want a conflict with Harry (after all this is a golden egg for Moehringer as well) about inconsistencies.
If Moehringer is such a skilled writer as many people seem to claim, him having a difficult client may explain why a number of very irrelevant and often most unflattering things were included in the book. He simply gave up discussing these bits and he didn't bother or had time to wait for Harry to eventually call back, meet in person or stop smoking silly weed, so such things could be addressed, adjusted and perhaps omitted.

Because I don't think Harry had any idea of how time consuming and difficult it is to write a book, even if you have someone writing it for you.
How difficult can it be?
Moehringer just had to write down what Harry told him, add a few photos and run a spell check. Big deal!

I suspect that apart from telling his "Harry the Lad" anecdotes and going on at length about his mistreatment and misfortunes, Harry really wasn't that interested in the working process. Finding that pretty boring. And as such I also suspect that Harry at times had to be dragged in by Moehringer to deal with issues and how they were to be presented. Probably at times being reluctant to even do that. - After all he, Harry, hired a ghostwriter to write the bl**dy book, so just write!
So while Harry, no doubt at all, was most interested in telling "his truth", I doubt he was particularly interested in how to tell it.

If it were me and I desperately wanted my message coming out, especially to a global market of potentially hundreds of millions, because I wanted to justify and vindicate myself, you bet I would be involved! That book would be my soul.

To me that suggests that Harry all his life has been used to someone dealing with whatever issues he has, without him being involved more than absolutely necessary.
- Had P.G. Wodehouse known Harry, he might have included him in his Jeeves and Wooster novels, as an archetypical upper class character.

And that's actually quite sad.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom