Queen Elizabeth II's Platinum Jubilee Celebrations: 2022

[Duc_et_Pair]

Although I agree that the Queen is not senile and been lead around - she knows that there is no reason to argue with the advice of her private secretary and increasingly more powerful of Charles staff - advisors and private secretary and pr guys. Yes - I expected this,simply because Charles has wanted it and the Pr teams has worked for years on it for great success , but the problem always was the public opinion which a note for the Queen clears up. [...]

[....]

After all, without intervention, Camilla is Queen in the very second Charles becomes King.

 

[AC21091968]

What a great news about Camilla's future on becoming Queen Consort, which clears up the rumour that she would be Princess Consort instead. I must admit I was not too surprised by The Queen's wish, given that Camilla was deservedly awarded the member of the Order of the Garter. To be fair, I would not be able to predict when the announcement (on Camilla's style of address when Charles becomes King) would be made at that time. Camilla has proven her dedication in supporting The Queen and serving the country with little or no fuss.

 

[Iluvbertie]

There was no 'rumour' about Camilla being Princess Consort. Until today that was the official line from BP and CH.

 

[MARG]

Why this announcement TODAY? Surely on the 70th anniversary of the accession of Elizabeth II, this could have waited?

It was obviously Her Majesty's choice to do it now

This annual pilgrimage to Balmoral has historically been the time Her Majesty has commemorated the unexpected death of a loved father and her abrupt ascension to the throne.

This year differs in that it is the first time she has faced that vigil alone and feels the loss of her beloved Consort Philip's love, support and strength. She has commemorated the changing of the guard from her father and his consort to herself and her consort for the best part of seventy years. For her to express hope in the continuity of the monarchy as an unchanging force for stability and hoping her heir's ascension should also be smooth and uncomplicated is hardly surprising on such an occasion.

HM has underscored the continuity of the BRF in large and small ways. My personal favourite was to see her carrying a Walking Staff, not to be confused with a walking stick, and her father's Walking Staff with its distinctive carved bone crook, to boot. What are the chances that we will see it added to Charles collection in the passing of time?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...s-Platinum-Jubilee-end-years-uncertainty.html

With the passing of her beloved Philip, HM has steadily continued to hand over the hard graft to Charles while remaining the Queen we all know and love and if we care to follow her clearly signposted feelings for Camilla, such as creating her a Royal Lady of the ancient Order of the Garter and public decision to hand more of the daily work of The Queen to Charles and Camilla, stating her preference for continuity is a no brainer.

Did anybody notice the letter was signed YOUR SERVANT Elizabeth R.

And that is the absolute perfect description of our Queen who has served us for seventy-plus years.

[ . . . ]

To me it is another PR mistake by the Prince of Wales, but since he seems to be in charge these days, he dragged his aging mother into it, on a day when the Queen, rather than Camilla, should have had the spotlight.

Sorry, but that is just how I feel.

You're acting like HM the Queen is somewhat in a semi senile state, manipulated by her son and doesn't realize what's she's doing.

I don't buy that.

She knows exactly what she's doing : leading the way to the next reign. Period. And there's not a single legal problem with the title "Queen Consort", as this is the legit term, albeit rarely eplicitly used, to adress the spouse of a reigning King.

To imply that our Queen is a doddering puppet is a downright insult to an amazing, wonderfully intelligent woman and Head of State and offensive to her subjects. A Queen Consort will be what Camilla is, Queen Camilla will be who she is. Her Majesty, our loyal Servant has stated her opinion, in favour of her and our history. Who are we to gainsay her?

The greatest gift we can give Her Gracious Majesty is the right to leave the monarchy in the same condition she inherited it.

 

[AC21091968]

There was no 'rumour' about Camilla being Princess Consort. Until today that was the official line from BP and CH.

I was referring to this Press release on 10th February 2005 from Clarence House on the marriage of HRH The Prince of Wales and Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles, which mentioned that Camilla "intended to" or "should use the title HRH The Princess Consort, when The Prince of Wales accedes to The Throne". The webpage is now archived and captured on 24th June 2014. It was this released that started the tittle tattle of Camilla not becoming Queen Consort when Charles ascends to the throne.

It is with great pleasure that the marriage of HRH The Prince of Wales and Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles is announced. It will take place on Saturday 9th April 2005.

The Prince of Wales has said: “Mrs Parker Bowles and I are absolutely delighted. It will be a very special day for us and our families.”

Princes William and Harry released a joint statement: "We are both very happy for our father and Camilla, and we wish them all the luck in the future."

Mrs Parker Bowles will use the title HRH The Duchess of Cornwall after marriage. It is intended that Mrs Parker Bowles should use the title HRH The Princess Consort when The Prince of Wales accedes to The Throne. The wedding will be a largely private occasion for family and friends. It will comprise a civil ceremony at the Guildhall in Windsor and will be followed by a service of prayer and dedication in St George’s Chapel over which the Archbishop of Canterbury will preside.

Announcement of the marriage of HRH The Prince of Wales and Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles
https://web.archive.org/web/2014062...rh-the-prince-of-wales-and-mrs-camilla-parker

 

[angieuk]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/...beth-says-childhood-friend-ahead-Jubilee.html

Queen's childhood friend gives interview.

 

[Iluvbertie]

I was referring to this Press release on 10th February 2005 from Clarence House on the marriage of HRH The Prince of Wales and Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles, which mentioned that Camilla "intended to" or "should use the title HRH The Princess Consort, when The Prince of Wales accedes to The Throne". The webpage is now archived and captured on 24th June 2014. It was this released that started the tittle tattle of Camilla not becoming Queen Consort when Charles ascends to the throne.



Announcement of the marriage of HRH The Prince of Wales and Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles
https://web.archive.org/web/2014062...rh-the-prince-of-wales-and-mrs-camilla-parker

Thank you for confirming what I said. It wasn't a 'rumour' that she would be Princess Consort. It was the official line from the palace - no 'rumour' about it.

A 'rumour' is something that isn't confirmed.

The Princess Consort title was the confirmed title from the date of the engagement until today. It wasn't a rumour at all.

 

[Spheno]

Thank you for confirming what I said. It wasn't a 'rumour' that she would be Princess Consort. It was the official line from the palace - no 'rumour' about it.

A 'rumour' is something that isn't confirmed.

The Princess Consort title was the confirmed title from the date of the engagement until today. It wasn't a rumour at all.

It was a discussed possibility, nothing more.

 

[Iluvbertie]

It was a discussed possibility, nothing more.

It wasn't a 'discussed possibility'. It was part of the official announcement at the time of the engagement and remained the official line on BP and CH's websites until a couple of years ago.

The question was even asked in parliament to confirm that would be her title and Mr Blair's response was that it would take legislation to allow that to happen, but he didn't say such legislation wouldn't be forthcoming when the time arose.

Since 10th February 2005 until today that has been the official line from the palace - she would be Princess Consort when Charles became King. That has now changed with the Queen's statement although it isn't as clear cut as many people seem to be suggesting:

It is my sincere wish, that when the time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort.

In other words this is her wish but not set in stone. Things can still change.

 

[wbenson]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1490275341289541635

A message from The Prince of Wales on the 70th anniversary of Her Majesty The Queen’s Accession.

On this historic day, my wife and I join you all in congratulating Her Majesty The Queen on the remarkable achievement of serving this nation, the Realms and Commonwealth for seventy years. The Queen's devotion to the welfare of all her people inspires still greater admiration with each passing year.

We are deeply conscious of the honour represented by my mother's wish. As we have sought together to serve and support Her Majesty and the people of our communities, my darling wife has been my own steadfast support throughout.

The year of this unprecedented Platinum Jubilee brings an opportunity for us all to come together in celebrating the service of The Queen, by whose example we will continue to be led in the years to come.

 

[Somebody]

Imho her Christmas speech was already a preparation for this statement when she stressed the importance of Camilla and Catherine.

 

[wartenberg7]

Thank you very much for posting the actual statement, Osipi.

Another link:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1490083061060575237

The Queen Consort, with "Consort" explicitly stated, is still a break from the traditional The Queen, but a minor one.

Well, "Consort" is somewhat of a description of this particular role. The Queen´s own mother and grandmother were both "consorts", but in everyday business this discription is never used - as well as Pr Philip was E´s consort, but nobody uses this term. He was only known as The D o Edinburgh, or Prince Philip. The wife of King George V was HM Queen Mary, but not HM Queen consort Mary, etc. as well as all those female (Majesty) and male (Roy. Highness) consorts that have gone before down the centuries.

Camilla will be HM Queen Camilla. But if somebody would ask who she exactly was, one would state "Oh, she´s the Consort of King Charles of GB and N Ireland", or something similar.
So in that sense it is not a break of tradition at all.

 

[LadyFinn]

Telegram from H.M. The King of Sweden:
On behalf of my family and the people of Sweden, I wish to extend to you our warmest congratulations on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of your accession to the throne ...
Telegram till H.M. Drottning Elizabeth II av Förenade konungariket Storbritannien och Nordirland - Sveriges Kungahus
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=476020377229421&set=pb.100044643870054.-2207520000..&type=3

The swedish royal court published these photos at its social media
http://imageupper.com/i/?S1200010060011C164414595043150
http://imageupper.com/i/?S1200010060021C164414595043150
http://imageupper.com/i/?S1200010060031C164414595043150
http://imageupper.com/i/?S1200010060041C164414595043150
http://imageupper.com/i/?S1200010060051C164414595043150
http://imageupper.com/i/?S1200010060061C164414595043150
http://imageupper.com/i/?S1200010060071C164414595043150

 

[wartenberg7]

Telegram from H.M. The King of Sweden:
On behalf of my family and the people of Sweden, I wish to extend to you our warmest congratulations on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of your accession to the throne ...

The swedish royal court published these photos at its social media
Image Upper.com - Free Image Hosting - View Image
Image Upper.com - Free Image Hosting - View Image
Image Upper.com - Free Image Hosting - View Image
Image Upper.com - Free Image Hosting - View Image
Image Upper.com - Free Image Hosting - View Image
Image Upper.com - Free Image Hosting - View Image
Image Upper.com - Free Image Hosting - View Image

Beautiful - thank you swedish royal court!

 

[Blog Real]

A message from The Prince of Wales on the 70th anniversary of Her Majesty The Queen’s Accession.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CZogpb4AcAM/?utm_medium=copy_link

Accession Day 2022:
https://www.royal.uk/accession-day-2022

King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia congratulate Elizabeth II on her Platinum Jubilee in a statement.
https://www.hola.com/realeza/casa_e...-letizia-felicitan-isabel-ii-jubileo-platino/

Message from the Royal House of Norway
https://www.instagram.com/p/CZoUbv7IyhH/?utm_medium=copy_link

Message from the Royal House of Sweden
https://www.instagram.com/p/CZoTx8uqXJr/?utm_medium=copy_link

 

[iceflower]

A new photo of Queen Elizabeth released today to mark Accession Day 202 - at work with her red boxes with official papers:


** Pic **


As well as a video.

 

[lucien]

She looks happy and engaged but frail. The loss of her husband clearly affected her greatly.

That is what I thought too,but then at 95,plus the loss of her husband is a combination that doesn´t favor ones appearance,yet HM still is strong,and inspiring.And genuinely loved I must add.

Queen Elizabeth II asks for Camilla to be referred to as Queen Consort

I am thrilled HM shows what has to be done,and always should have been done regardless any discussion.HM decided wisely,and lovingly.Wonderfull

 

[Hallo girl]

A new photo of Queen Elizabeth released today to mark Accession Day 202 - at work with her red boxes with official papers:


** Pic **

What a lovely relaxed photograph, not what I was expecting. With Philip still by her side.

 

[Mbruno]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1490275341289541635

A message from The Prince of Wales on the 70th anniversary of Her Majesty The Queen’s Accession.

It is interesting that the PoW referred to "this nation, the Realms and the Commonwealth" instead of the usual line "this nation and the Commonwealth". Although the Realms are obviously part of the Commonwealth too, they have now been singled out as a separate subcategory, which is correct in my opinion.

Regrettably, however, instead of putting the focus on his mother's accomplishment, Prince Charles chose to make his message about his "darling wife". Whoever handles his PR should be fired IMHO.

 

[shady lady]

I am thrilled HM shows what has to be done,and always should have been done regardless any discussion.HM decided wisely,and lovingly.Wonderfull

The Queen is just awesome! Many congratulations to her and my heartfelt thanks for her 70 years of service.

I tend to lurk here rather than comment but wanted to say I too am pleased with the announcement about Camilla, I think she is good for Charles and has brought him happiness and contentment. Of course she could never replace Diana as William's much loved mother but I'd like to think that William is genuinely fond of her too.

Just my opinion

 

[Somebody]

A message from The Prince of Wales on the 70th anniversary of Her Majesty The Queen’s Accession.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CZogpb4AcAM/?utm_medium=copy_link

Accession Day 2022:
https://www.royal.uk/accession-day-2022

"my darling wife" who has been his own "steadfast support"...

What a lovely relaxed photograph, not what I was expecting. With Philip still by her side.

Was it Philip or her father? I thought it was HM King George VI - which is also what I was expecting as she is also remembering her father's passing today.

 

[Denville]

It looks you don't want to see word "intend"

Intend means - that is what will happen though it isn't laid down in granite. It is an official line, but with room for change if a change seems desiralbe. If Charles had become King a year or 2 after his marriage probalby the decsion would have been to let Camilla be known as Princess Consort. Now many years later, the decision will be different.

 

[Duc_et_Pair]

What a lovely relaxed photograph, not what I was expecting. With Philip still by her side.

I thought it was King George VI by her side?

 

[Somebody]

It is interesting that the PoW referred to "this nation, the Realms and the Commonwealth" instead of the usual line "this nation and the Commonwealth". Although the Realms are obviously part of the Commonwealth too, they have now been singled out as a separate subcategory, which is correct in my opinion.

Regrettably, however, instead of putting the focus on his mother's accomplishment, Prince Charles chose to make his message about his "darling wife". Whoever handles his PR should be fired IMHO.

I don't think he could 'ignore' his mother's statement in his public message - which started with a celebration of his mother's achievements and ended with a call to celebrate her. So, by positioning it in the middle the most important parts (order of importance in these kind of texts: first, last, middle paragraphs) of his message still focused on his mother.

 

[Duc_et_Pair]

It is interesting that the PoW referred to "this nation, the Realms and the Commonwealth" instead of the usual line "this nation and the Commonwealth". Although the Realms are obviously part of the Commonwealth too, they have now been singled out as a separate subcategory, which is correct in my opinion.

Regrettably, however, instead of putting the focus on his mother's accomplishment, Prince Charles chose to make his message about his "darling wife". Whoever handles his PR should be fired IMHO.

I think it is just a personal note. We see foreign royals using the same expression too like "my sweet aunt", "my beloved daughter", "my darling (or dearest) wife". Sometimes the linguïstic meaning in French, Spanish, Dutch, Danish etc. is not found in English.

 

[Hallo girl]

Was it Philip or her father? I thought it was HM King George VI - which is also what I was expecting as she is also remembering her father's passing today.

You are correct, my first sight of the photograph was on my phone, I have now looked on the computer which is obviously a bigger screen. It is her father and does make more sense for him to be there.

 

[Stefan]

Was it Philip or her father? I thought it was HM King George VI - which is also what I was expecting as she is also remembering her father's passing today.

Yes that is her father on the pic behind her.

 

[Nico]

Regrettably, however, instead of putting the focus on his mother's accomplishment, Prince Charles chose to make his message about his "darling wife". Whoever handles his PR should be fired IMHO.

[.....]
Charles has always referred Camilla as his "darling wife" in all his previous statements. Why change now ? I's a very welcomed personnal touch, emphasizing HM's gesture. It's of course a dynastical matter, but also a family one. And we all pretty know that's it's not always smooth sailing on that front ...

Why desperately searching malice from Charles 's camp (more or less manipulating his mother's weekness, hijacking her jubilee , and i see you're looking for a feud with the Cambridges as well) ?

This title issue is not a sudden whim out of her HM's hat. It's a well though statement, obviously agreed in advance with all parties involved (including the heir to the heir) and, on second thought, not at all suprising for us, royal watchers : after the RFO, the RVO, the Privy Council and the Garter, it's the natural conclusion of Camilla's elevation to the Top job.

We are witnessing the exciting process of the modeling of the next reign and the millennial continuity of the Monarchy.

And naysayers, twitter comments, Netflix and others will not change that fact, as it was always the case.

 

[Claire]

[...]

After all, without intervention, Camilla is Queen in the very second Charles becomes King.

This statement is pretty much exactly what Charles' private secretary wanted included in the previous Jubilee speeches, it was requested again in to be included in this his birthday statement. It was decided then that the emphasis should be on the celebration of the Jubilee and not on the succession.
But time has marched on. After all when Charles is King, he can do as he wants, but he (or they) really want us to know that the Queen gave her approval.

I think Charles replay was intended to invoke the Queen's oath to duty that she made in South Africa - and as they cannot say Empire anymore, hence nation, realm and Commonwealth. I know many people will look at steadfast and say the whole paragraph is the way the Queen would refer to Prince Philip. The thing I notice about the statement is that it is just a statement from Prince Charles and not from the rest of the family. Unsure - if I was Prince Charles' private secretary- I would have advise a congratulatory statement from the family as a whole and not one singly from yourself especially one highlighting your support and contributions. But each his own.

 

[roseroyal]

70 years.
Wow! I know of 5 people who lived before the Queen was Queen- they’ve all passed. How I wish I asked more questions.
I hate to be a downer, but you watch all this with great joy- the Queen is a remarkable lady of great faith who has a beauty on the inside which radiates out, and what a milestone but in the back of your mind, you’re sad because you know a certain day is coming. Now I don’t fear for the Queen, but I feel a little bit of dread. Because I simply cannot imagine a world without her as Queen- without her.
I know Charles will do lovely.
Having lived through days I dreaded I know life will go on. But.

A new photo of Queen Elizabeth released today to mark Accession Day 202 - at work with her red boxes with official papers:


** Pic **


As well as a video.

What a great picture.