The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #401  
Old 07-15-2017, 04:38 AM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,393
I can't get that to work, it keeps jumping!! but I'd question these sorts of reports. it does seem pretty indisputable that Chas was almost caught making love to her outside at Balmoral or somewhere by press photographers.
So I realy doubt if he saw her as wife material, if he was that careless about her
Reply With Quote
  #402  
Old 07-15-2017, 04:53 AM
Dee Anna's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Here, Ireland
Posts: 599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
..... I know that even I would find it uncomfortable to be married to someone who had an already existing close circle of friends that I found not only totally different from myself but one my husband felt very at home with. It helps me to understand why Di had a huge "me vs. them" attitude when it came to Charles' free time and his friends.
That is an exellent observation!

Throw in the family she was marrying into (and the constant media attention that came with it), the 13 year age gap (which shouldn't matter if the situation is right), engagement at 19 and a husband whose emotional ties lay elsewhere, she did quite well to last as long as she did!

Diana came from the right background and was expected to conform with the reality of life at that level. She didn't and the rest is history.
__________________
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken ..... Oscar Wilde
Reply With Quote
  #403  
Old 07-15-2017, 02:12 PM
Queen Claude's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA, United States
Posts: 1,352
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
Just to clarify things. Camilla was never in her life Roman Catholic. She and Andrew married in a Catholic church and her children were raised Catholic but Camilla, herself, never converted from the Church of England.
I was not saying that Camilla was Catholic, I was making an illustration, I also included being a divorcee in my illustration and Camilla was not a divorcee in the 1970s.

Quote:
Uncle "Dickie" Mountbatten was the person Charles listened to most when it came to relationships. Camilla and Charles spent quite a bit of time together at Broadlands back when they first met but Mountbatten didn't think that Camilla was "bride material" for Charles but rather good for sowing the wild oats.
To be sure Charles put a lot of stock in what Louis Mountbatten / Uncle Dickie thought and his advice but he was not a complete submissive. Fast forward to the late 1970s, that's when Charles was carrying on with married women like Camilla and Kanga Tryon, which distressed his great uncle tremendously because he feared that Charles could end up like his other great uncle, Edward VIII, and he did not mince words in the letters he sent Charles over the matter, nevertheless Charles continued on with his relationships with married women.

Quote:
The point is moot anyways because even if Charles had gone the "non negotiable" route back in the 70s with Camilla, the chances of Camilla turning down Charles' proposal was good. She had her cap set at Andrew PB.
I agree. IMO Camilla setting her cap for Andrew Parker Bowles is really what torpedoed Charles and Camilla, Parte Une.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
I don't know what you mean by a PR problem. of course the reasoning behnd the idea was that if a woman had a sexual past, tthe press would get hold of it, and it would run stories and be embarrassing.
That's called a PR problem.


Quote:
As we know from Davina Sheffield's boyfriend tattling to the papers..
which was why it was unlikely that a woman with a sexual past, like Cam would have been accepted by the queen as Charles' wife.
Queen who? Queen Elizabeth II? The woman who married a man that no one approved of. Come to think Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip are a good illustration, just like with Charles, there was a sort of checklist of who would be a suitable mate for the then Princess Elizabeth and Prince Philip did not meet the criteria, and yet the marriage took place.


Quote:
if she was a divorced woman the same would have applied because as the future governor of the C of E, Charles could not, then have married a divorced woman because it would look bad..and the C of E would be unhappy with it.
My point, which it seems like you disagree with, is that marrying a woman with a past was problematic in that it posed a PR problem, but it was not on par with marrying a divorcee or a Catholic.

Quote:
I have never heard of Charles' proposing to Anna Wallace. where did you read this story... because I don't believe that if he considered her as a serious candidate for his wife, he would have been so careless abuot her reputation that he would almost have been caught with her, in a semi naked state, outdoors.
It was reported by in the The Telegraph and the Daily Mail to name two. When I have seen write ups about Charles and Anna Wallace, I have seen more references to him proposing to her than references to the incident where they were nearly caught in an intimate moment.
Reply With Quote
  #404  
Old 07-15-2017, 02:19 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,393
well if you really think that the queen would have approved of the marriage to Camilla, I can't argue.
I've never seen any ref to Charles proposing to Anna, just refs to their rows about his dancing iwht Camilla and the incident where a photographer apparently managed to snap her where they had been making out, outdoors. I don't believe that the press would have metntoned that "embarrassing photo" if it didn't exist and I tend to like to see something in a book rather than the papers.
I wouldn't say that no one approved of Philip, clearly the King must have been ok with the match, or he would not have given permission. My impression was that some of the Palace old courters and some of the RF didn't like him because Phil was young and brash.. but that the Kings main objection was that his daughter was rather young..
But he was royal, related to the queen and knew what Royal life was like. He was intelligent and he was committed to the UK and had served in the armed forces... and the King was OK with him and gave permission.
I don't believe the queen would have agreed to Charles marrying a woman like Camilla in the 70s.
Reply With Quote
  #405  
Old 07-15-2017, 02:22 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
IIRC the 'courtiers' actively pushed titled Englishmen at Princess Elizabeth and strongly opposed her marrying a penniless/homeless foreigner. Her father wasn't too keen about it either except he knew Phillip made her happy and so he gave in.


LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #406  
Old 07-15-2017, 02:27 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee Anna View Post
That is an exellent observation!

Throw in the family she was marrying into (and the constant media attention that came with it), the 13 year age gap (which shouldn't matter if the situation is right), engagement at 19 and a husband whose emotional ties lay elsewhere, she did quite well to last as long as she did!

.
She didn't really have a choice though Dee Anna. I have read that Diana talked about leaving C when Will was just a baby, that she was really unhappy that early on. however realistically, I think she knew that she could not walk out of this marriage in the way she could have, had Charles not been the POW.
I think that she problaby DID talk about leaving him, at least somewhere in the mid 80s at least and was probably told that it could not happen, that the marriage had to keep going.
I agree that yes she did find the Charles circle daunting, and after a bit of an effort to get on with them she soon returned to her old circle of friends and the two circles never really met. But IMO that even need not have been a problem or not a big one, had she and Charles not had an almost complete lack of meeting of minds.
Reply With Quote
  #407  
Old 07-15-2017, 03:05 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Member - in Memoriam
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
I think we're getting off track here. Lets leave the C&D discussions to the appropriate threads? This is a good discussion and I'd hate to see it derailed and the mods close the thread.

Charles' circle of friends certainly were a closed knit bunch though. The friends he made, he kept and they remained fiercely loyal to him. They all enjoyed the same country pursuits, had round robins of house parties and Charles grew to depend on their advice quite a bit.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
Reply With Quote
  #408  
Old 07-15-2017, 04:10 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,393
I think we would be getting OT if we go on about C's friends even! I don't know if Charles really depended on their advice that much. Reputedy, he asked friends what they thought of Diana and a few felt that she wasn't right for him and said so. But he still married her. Like most people, I think he does what he wants to.. even if he asks for advice. but yes I think they are loyal to him, they don't usualy talk to the media much, and they helped to conceal his affair with Camilla.
Reply With Quote
  #409  
Old 09-30-2017, 06:27 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: jersey shore, United States
Posts: 1,124
I remember seeing the picture in the paper of C and C at the tree initial carvings. I thought then (as a teen) this is the one. And then life took its course. Camilla has withstood more than I can imagine. I hope she gets the the proper title when the time comes I doubt it would happen but I’d love to see them go back to that tree for their Christmas card picture
Reply With Quote
  #410  
Old 10-01-2017, 04:36 AM
Dee Anna's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Here, Ireland
Posts: 599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missjersey View Post
I remember seeing the picture in the paper of C and C at the tree initial carvings. I thought then (as a teen) this is the one.
..... I doubt it would happen but I’d love to see them go back to that tree for their Christmas card picture
I can't see that happen and definitely not this year, Diana's 20th Anniversary!

Nor I imagine would William and Harry be too impressed with the merging of the two relationship lifespans.
__________________
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken ..... Oscar Wilde
Reply With Quote
  #411  
Old 10-01-2017, 05:31 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Waterford, United States
Posts: 3,217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
I can't get that to work, it keeps jumping!! but I'd question these sorts of reports. it does seem pretty indisputable that Chas was almost caught making love to her outside at Balmoral or somewhere by press photographers.
So I realy doubt if he saw her as wife material, if he was that careless about her
Careless? “When little head gets big, big head gets little.”
__________________
"If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will.”

Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #412  
Old 10-01-2017, 06:24 AM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladongas View Post
Careless? “When little head gets big, big head gets little.”
Charles wasn't sexually involved iwht Diana, and he was careful with her, to ensure that nothing compromising happened.. I don't believe that reporters ever got a pic of them together till they were engaged.
He was sexually involved with Anna, and clearly didn't worry about the possibility of their being snapped fooling around. which seems to me to indicate that he saw her as a mistress, not a wife.. and I don't know of any convincing evidence that he proposed to her.
Reply With Quote
  #413  
Old 10-01-2017, 11:37 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Member - in Memoriam
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
Charles wasn't sexually involved iwht Diana, and he was careful with her, to ensure that nothing compromising happened.. I don't believe that reporters ever got a pic of them together till they were engaged.
He was sexually involved with Anna, and clearly didn't worry about the possibility of their being snapped fooling around. which seems to me to indicate that he saw her as a mistress, not a wife.. and I don't know of any convincing evidence that he proposed to her.
Lets put it this way. Charles and Diana were careful that nothing compromising ever made its way to public knowledge.

I've read in several sources where Diana was driven back to London from Highgrove early in the morning quite disheveled and glowing before the wedding. It really doesn't matter really. Remember the big story about the blond and the train? That mystery has not been solved to this day. Some say it was Camilla. Some say it was Diana and some swear there was no one that night on the train.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
Reply With Quote
  #414  
Old 10-01-2017, 01:04 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,393
What sources?
yes there was the Royal Train story, but the point about that was that when it looked as if It was "Diana on the train", the RF went into "defending her honour" mode..
I don't believe anyway that Charles and Diana were sexually involved before the wedding. There is a quote in Tina B's biography, which although it is not from a named source, seems to me to be a bit ungallant but possibly true.. that Charles said that the "first night was nothing special, that it was nice but Diana was very naïve".
Reply With Quote
  #415  
Old 10-01-2017, 01:12 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Member - in Memoriam
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
What sources?
yes there was the Royal Train story, but the point about that was that when it looked as if It was "Diana on the train", the RF went into "defending her honour" mode..
I don't believe anyway that Charles and Diana were sexually involved before the wedding. There is a quote in Tina B's biography, which although it is not from a named source, seems to me to be a bit ungallant but possibly true.. that Charles said that the "first night was nothing special, that it was nice but Diana was very naïve".
If memory serves me right, Stephen Barry who was Charles' valet, knew of the nights they spent together at Highgrove. So did members of the protection squad at the time. With the amount of people constantly in and around both Charles and Diana from the get go, it would have been impossible to have kept it a secret.

It doesn't matter anyhow and talking about Diana in this thread is going off topic.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
Reply With Quote
  #416  
Old 12-17-2022, 12:23 PM
Blog Real's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 10,480
Prince Charles is seen chatting with Camilla Parker Bowles at a Polo Match in Jul. 1975. She was married at the time.
https://c3.quickcachr.fotos.sapo.pt/...919_UQd8u.jpeg
__________________
My blogs about monarchies
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
camilla, duchess of cornwall, prince charles, prince of wales, relationships


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which countries would you like to see Charles & Camilla visit over the next few years muriel King Charles III and Queen Camilla 196 12-06-2022 05:13 PM
Harald & Sonja - early years Julia King Harald and Queen Sonja 155 06-12-2022 10:57 AM
Queenship and Revolution in Early Modern Europe: Henrietta Maria and Marie Antoinette CarolynHarris Royal Library 4 01-31-2016 01:11 PM
September 2009: The 1970s Zonk Forum Announcements and Admin 8 09-17-2009 12:48 PM




Popular Tags
#rashidmrm abdullah ii abolished monarchies africa all tags arcadie arcadie claret bevilacqua caribbean charles iii claret current events danish royal family death defunct thrones denmark duarte pio edward vii emperor naruhito empress masako espana fallen empires fallen kingdom garsenda genealogy grace kelly grimaldi harry history hobbies house of gonzaga identifying introduction king charles king philippe lady pamela hicks leopold ier mall coronation day matrilineal monaco monarchy movies official visit order of precedence pamela mountbatten portugal prince albert monaco prince christian princess of orange queen queen alexandra queen camilla queen elizabeth queen ena of spain queen margrethe ii republics restoration royal initials royal wedding royal without thrones silk spanish history state visit state visit to france state visit to germany tiaras visit william wine glass woven


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2023
Jelsoft Enterprises