General News about Frederik, Mary and Family 8: March - May 2011 - Page 20

SweetRomanza · #**381** 05-18-2011, 11:54 AM

True!

My biggest issue is when I compare them to other CP couples that are much more affectionate in public. I shouldn't.

Sternchen · #**382** 05-18-2011, 03:44 PM

Displaying a lot of public affection doesn't necessarily mean, that they also have this feelings for each other

ricarda · #**383** 05-18-2011, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SweetRomanza

Is it me or CP Frederik and Mary do not seem to interact in public? They never talk to each other, hold hands, smile or laugh together. I miss that chemistry in them...

They never talk to each other, hold hands, smile or laugh together in public?
It's you.

SweetRomanza · #**384** 05-18-2011, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sternchen

Displaying a lot of public affection doesn't necessarily mean, that they also have this feelings for each other

True! I shouldnt have said anything
;-)

missMaryanne · #**385** 05-18-2011, 04:29 PM

that's true, sternchen. there's a phrase in my country: "tell me what you flaunt of, and i'll tell you what you doesn't have"(i hope i translate it well, my english is kinda poor in some cases)...what i want to say is that public affections could be to show something you don't have on private, at home, when you're alone with your wife or husband, and you need to show it so people could believe that your relationship is perfect.

personally, i don't like being affective in public. my man knows that i love him and i'm his, and i know that he's mine and he loves me with all his heart. we don't need to be an exhibitionist or something like that to demonstate everybody that we love each other. we just enjoy our relationship(which has the same time than m&f's) when we are together at our bedroom, when nobody's watching us, then we can be free to do whatever we want, without spectators around us.

in m&f's case, it's more important because they are royals, and they aren't supposed to demonstate their affects in public. now we can see these royal couples doing it, and that's ok if they're not extremely affective, and if m&f doesn't want to do it, it's ok, too, because it's their choice to be like that. since the very beggining, they were extremely discret with their relationship and their public performances, and there's no reason to change now that they are married and have more than 10 years together...and we have to see another thing, they have cameras around them almost 24/7, and that is hard to deal with it. i think they still love each other, they only prefer to be more affective when they are alone. without all those people who was always around them.

sorry if i didn't explain myself correctly...

SweetRomanza · #**386** 05-18-2011, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ricarda

They never talk to each other, hold hands, smile or laugh together in public?
It's you.

Thanks!!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by missMaryanne

that's true, sternchen. there's a phrase in my country: "tell me what you flaunt of, and i'll tell you what you doesn't have"(i hope i translate it well, my english is kinda poor in some cases)...what i want to say is that public affections could be to show something you don't have on private, at home, when you're alone with your wife or husband, and you need to show it so people could believe that your relationship is perfect.

personally, i don't like being affective in public. my man knows that i love him and i'm his, and i know that he's mine and he loves me with all his heart. we don't need to be an exhibitionist or something like that to demonstate everybody that we love each other. we just enjoy our relationship(which has the same time than m&f's) when we are together at our bedroom, when nobody's watching us, then we can be free to do whatever we want, without spectators around us.

in m&f's case, it's more important because they are royals, and they aren't supposed to demonstate their affects in public. now we can see these royal couples doing it, and that's ok if they're not extremely affective, and if m&f doesn't want to do it, it's ok, too, because it's their choice to be like that. since the very beggining, they were extremely discret with their relationship and their public performances, and there's no reason to change now that they are married and have more than 10 years together...and we have to see another thing, they have cameras around them almost 24/7, and that is hard to deal with it. i think they still love each other, they only prefer to be more affective when they are alone. without all those people who was always around them.

sorry if i didn't explain myself correctly...

I understood you perfectly. Thank you

I wasn't only talking about holding hands. But there is nothing I can say, I do not know them personally and can only rely on photos.

But at the same time we say "that couple is so loving" when we see a beautiful picture, one should not have stones thrown at just for having doubts.

Sternchen · #**387** 05-18-2011, 04:58 PM

I know what you mean, but if you have a look at some of the photos from Verbier, when F&M thought that there was no pap around, they were indeed affectionat

Mary and Frederik on the slopes - Pictures - Zimbio

SweetRomanza · #**388** 05-18-2011, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sternchen

I know what you mean, but if you have a look at some of the photos from Verbier, when F&M thought that there was no pap around, they were indeed affectionat

Mary and Frederik on the slopes - Pictures - Zimbio

Ohhhh! that really really warms my heart

Cinderella5x · #**389** 05-18-2011, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sternchen

I know what you mean, but if you have a look at some of the photos from Verbier, when F&M thought that there was no pap around, they were indeed affectionat

Mary and Frederik on the slopes - Pictures - Zimbio

How do we know they thought there were no pap around?

Sternchen · #**390** 05-18-2011, 05:10 PM

The photos have been taken from far away judging by how grainy they are

missMaryanne · #**391** 05-18-2011, 05:13 PM

i saw that pictures before, and during these 7 years of marriage we have seen a lot of pictures of them holding hands, talking to each other, smiling, and kissing each other on each other's cheeks, and even on the lips...that are just rumours from people who doesn't like to see a happy couple... you know, scandals sells more magazines and newspapers...

don't worry about that, sweetromanza...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cinderella5x

How do we know they thought there were no pap around?

the quality of that photos is quite questionable... but the most important is that we only can see their backs and we can see frederik's face only when he turns to mary. if the pap were closer, we could see their faces more clearly, if they were in front of them, and even if they were beside them. take a look at the most recent photos and the verbier photos, and compare both...

Cinderella5x · #**392** 05-18-2011, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sternchen

The photos have been taken from far away judging by how grainy they are

Quote:

Originally Posted by missMaryanne

the quality of that photos is quite questionable... but the most important is that we only can see their backs and we can see frederik's face only when he turns to mary. if the pap were closer, we could see their faces more clearly, if they were in front of them, and even if they were beside them. take a look at the most recent photos and the verbier photos, and compare both...

That's all true, but it still doesn't prove they did not know the pap were around. There is a lot of closer picture from the same day, in front, so I am sure they knew the pap were there.

Sternchen · #**393** 05-18-2011, 05:40 PM

They definetly knew that there were photographers, but how do you know that you are being (in that very moment) photographed with a lense from far away?
With this kind of cameras, the photographer can hide a few hundred meters away in the forrest.

:: mein fotobazar :: - fotos kaufen, fotos verkaufen, foto-community, foto-bewertung, bildagentur, …

Apart from that, do you have any proof that they knew that there were taken photos of them in that moment?

Cinderella5x · #**394** 05-18-2011, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sternchen

They definetly knew that there were photographers, but how do you know that you are being (in that very moment) photographed with a lense from far away?
With this kind of cameras, the photographer can hide a few hundred meters away in the forrest.

:: mein fotobazar :: - fotos kaufen, fotos verkaufen, foto-community, foto-bewertung, bildagentur, …

Apart from that, do you have any proof that they knew that there were taken photos of them in that moment?

No, I do not, and I never said they knew they were photographed at the moment, all I was referring to was your post below:

Originally Posted by Sternchen

I know what you mean, but if you have a look at some of the photos from Verbier, when F&M thought that there was no pap around, they were indeed affectionat

Mary and Frederik on the slopes - Pictures - Zimbio

Please note all I said was: How do we know they thought there were no pap around?

I am not saying they knew, I am not saying they did not know. I am just asking how do we know what they thought.

SweetRomanza · #**395** 05-18-2011, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by missMaryanne

i saw that pictures before, and during these 7 years of marriage we have seen a lot of pictures of them holding hands, talking to each other, smiling, and kissing each other on each other's cheeks, and even on the lips...that are just rumours from people who doesn't like to see a happy couple... you know, scandals sells more magazines and newspapers...

don't worry about that, sweetromanza...

I love happy couples! was not my intention to spread a rumour.

missMaryanne · #**396** 05-18-2011, 05:50 PM

that's right sternchen, and, what if they probably assumed that the photographers were gone after giving them the opportunity to take a shoot...

Sternchen · #**397** 05-18-2011, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cinderella5x

No, I do not, and I never said they knew they were photographed at the moment, all I was referring to was your post below:

Please note all I said was: How do we know they thought there were no pap around?

I am not saying they knew, I am not saying they did not know. I am just asking how do we know what they thought.

Well, you ask questions, and I asked questions

Btw. I never claimed to know what they are/were thinking, that is purely your interpretation.

Cinderella5x · #**398** 05-18-2011, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sternchen

Well, you ask questions, and I asked questions

Btw. I never claimed to know what they are/were thinking, that is purely your interpretation.

And I think I answered your questions, didn't I?

I am quoting once again your post, which says: when F&M thought that there was no pap around.

That, to me, is claiming you know what they were thinking.

Originally Posted by Sternchen

I know what you mean, but if you have a look at some of the photos from Verbier, when F&M thought that there was no pap around, they were indeed affectionat

Mary and Frederik on the slopes - Pictures - Zimbio

Sternchen · #**399** 05-18-2011, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SweetRomanza

I love happy couples! was not my intention to spread a rumour.

I don't think missMaryanne thought you were spreading rumours, but that you might have read about rumours in a paper and that was the reason for your concern

missMaryanne · #**400** 05-18-2011, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SweetRomanza

I love happy couples! was not my intention to spread a rumour.

no hard feelings, sweetie, i read those rumours everyday in some spanish forums...i just were a little bit deffensive about that(and i couldn't had to be like that, because i don't know f&m), but i don't believe it until i see it...

forgive me if i'm rough...

Quote:

Originally Posted by SweetRomanza

I love happy couples! was not my intention to spread a rumour.

i quote it again to make clear that i didn't thought that you were spreading rumours...don't worry about that because we are here having a civilized concersation...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sternchen

I don't think missMaryanne thought you were spreading rumours, but that you might have read about rumours in a paper and that was the reason for your concern

you're right, stern... i deal with rumours of all these royal houses everytime i get connected on some forums...