 |
|

04-29-2008, 07:37 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Neuilly, France
Posts: 516
|
|
1) The sovereign is not a commoner.
2) Peers are not commoners.
3) The Prince of Wales is not a commoner.
4) All other British princes and princesses hold that title as a courtesy, similarly to the younger children of certain peers.
|

05-04-2008, 04:20 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ******, United States
Posts: 837
|
|
A commoner is a person who does not hold a royal or noble title.
Anyone that holds a title is not a commoner they are royal or noble.
__________________
Patience is a virtue.
|

05-04-2008, 04:41 AM
|
 |
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: monaco, Monaco
Posts: 16
|
|
this may not be correct but i heard that primeminister disrale refused to bow to Queen Victoria on the fact that he did not wish to bow before a woman
ps it might not be correct
__________________
“The freedom of the press works in such a way that there is not much freedom from it.”
Grace Kelly
the most wonderful fairy-tale princess
|

05-04-2008, 05:24 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 356
|
|
I very, very strongly suspect that isn't correct. Also, Disraeli.
|

05-04-2008, 06:36 AM
|
 |
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: monaco, Monaco
Posts: 16
|
|
i did say i was not sure but thanks for clarifying
__________________
“The freedom of the press works in such a way that there is not much freedom from it.”
Grace Kelly
the most wonderful fairy-tale princess
|

05-04-2008, 07:48 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cascais, Portugal
Posts: 2,155
|
|
A Serene Highness does not get a curtsey. A Royal Highness does but it is only out of courtesy. If you don´t want to be courteous then don´t. A queen does not bow to a Queen. I remember an occasion when someone had recently become a Queen and went to curtsey to a HRH she had known all her life and was so accustomed to it that she forgot and they almost cracked knees. There was quite a bit of giggling about that later.
Menarue
|

05-04-2008, 08:35 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,977
|
|
Diana, Princess of Wales and I believe an Asian consort..possibly the Queen of Malaysia but I can't be certain.
__________________
"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
|

05-04-2008, 03:28 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cascais, Portugal
Posts: 2,155
|
|
The incident I was referring to was between Queen Fabiola and a Spanish Infanta.
Menarue
|

05-05-2008, 12:16 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,977
|
|
I've never heard of that before. Interesting. Which Infanta?
__________________
"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
|

05-06-2008, 07:16 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cascais, Portugal
Posts: 2,155
|
|
Actually I heard this from the "horse´s mouth" so I would rather not say which Infanta. When I said it was giggled about it was a Royal giggle among family so it wouldn´t have been public knowledge but funny.
Menarue
|

05-06-2008, 10:07 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,977
|
|
Rather not say? Well, you went as far as to name HM Queen Fabiola did you not? And that would mean this Infanta to be in her latter years, considering Baudouin succeeded to the Belgian throne in 1960. So I'd suspect one of Don Juan Carlos' sisters, but I'm certainly not one to press so that's fine.
Interesting, indeed.
__________________
"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
|

05-06-2008, 11:04 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cascais, Portugal
Posts: 2,155
|
|
Exactly. A lovely woman Queen Fabiola and as she was Spanish she knew the Spanish royal family well and habit won over, she curtseyed and so did the Infanta. Good investigative faculties.
Menarue
|

05-13-2008, 09:18 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wiltshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,507
|
|
__________________
This is the stuff of fairytales
|

05-19-2008, 11:20 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: xx, Canada
Posts: 1,649
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by politikgirl
Very well done on Natalie's part!
I wonder what people here think of Madame Carla Sarkozy's curtsey for HM The Queen during the UK visit, given the above discussion about protocol for wives of head of states.
You can see the curtsey at this link:
|
Mme. Sarkozy seems very classy and the French people should be proud of her.
__________________
Duchess
|

05-19-2008, 11:22 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: xx, Canada
Posts: 1,649
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew
|
it is isn't it! i'm impressed that someone as young as ms. portman would make the gesture.
__________________
Duchess
|

05-20-2008, 03:19 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Neuilly, France
Posts: 516
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by leonardinha
Well, in Italy and in Austria titles are forbidden as well, but it is not a faux pas to curtsey/bow to royalty. 
|
Actually, Austria's position on titles is more strict than that of the United States. It is illegal to use a title in Austria, or even to use an adelspredikat ("von" or "de").
In the United States, it is forbidden for the government to grant titles of nobility, and it is expected that noblemen relinquish their titles in order to become American citizens. However, Americans are allowed to inherit titles without losing citizenship.
As for bowing/curtseying, it is not a faux pas for an American. It is considered polite to show knowledge of protocol, both foreign and domestic. The constitution has nothing to do with it.
|

05-21-2008, 09:27 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: WPB FL/Muttontown NY, United States
Posts: 853
|
|
Sigh. It has nothing to do with "manners"
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingJosh
First of all I think it's fine that Mrs. Annenberg curtsied to His Royal Highness as a sign of respect. That was what she was used to and so thats what she did.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingJosh
Second No matter where in the world they are U.S. or not Her Majesty is still Her Majesty the Queen, just as Prince Charles and his wife are still Their Royal Highnesses the Prince and Princess of Wales and should still be treated as such and if Bowing/curtsing is how to show them respect then thats what should be done, regardless of what country they are in. For example when i'm in uniform in the United States and a higher ranking officer from another country is walking past I still salute him becuase regardless of country he is still a higher rank then me, and it's the same with Royalty. The biggest problem in America is that most of us have lost our manners.
|
On US soil, she is Her Majesty the Queen - but she is not sovereign! She does not rule. Good heavens. And if she does not rule here, then certainly her son and his current-day wife do not merit a courtsey or bow here. Fortunately, on other travels to the US with either of his wives, Charles received appropriate courtesies from knowledgable sources.
The point - and it cannot seem to be overemphasized - is that manners are not aligned to protocol, and courtesy is akin to but not synonymous with either. Attempting to turn protocol into a discussion of "manners" is disingenous, at best. At certain tables in this world, belching is considered "good manners." If someone here would like to express their good manners at a royal banquet by belching, please raise your hand.
And finally, the genuine upshot of my story was that Mrs. Annenberg, of all people, should have been versed and rehearsed within an inch of her life on this. There is no stricter protocol than the Court of St. James; of all people, she should have known better. Even Charles was embarassed, even if she didn't have the presence of mind to be so. Especially the extremely obsequious nature of her physical demeanor. Truly cringe-worthy.
__________________
"Me, your Highness? On the whole, I wish I'd stayed in Tunbridge Wells"
|

05-21-2008, 10:12 PM
|
 |
Former Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 2,890
|
|
Army Regulation 600-25 Salutes, Honors, and Visits of Courtesy
Chapter 1-5 Paragraph e:
e. It is customary to salute officers of friendly foreign nations when recognized as such.
|

05-21-2008, 10:49 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NY, United States
Posts: 169
|
|
I have to say (as an American,) I feel that it's a matter of following the respect and courtesy of the country you're in. I wouldn't expect to have to bow to anyone in the United States simply because that isn't the way we do things. If I had to go to another country where such things are the norm, I would probably make more of an effort to follow their customs.
I can't say absolutely that I would curtsy however, simply because I have never had to do it and never learned. I would rather show respect in another way and avoid embarrassing myself and the royal at hand (who I think would probably understand) by botching a curtsy. (On the other hand, if I knew I was going to meet royalty, hehe, I would probably make the effort BEFOREHAND to learn how to curtsy and other traditions/protocols as well.)
If they don't understand, well, in my experience I probably wouldn't respect that person either. Not every situation is going to go as you want it and be ideal and you have to take some gestures of respect as they are intended and not as they are enacted traditionally.
There's a funny story I read while I was taking a graduate course on Saints and Heretics. A Jewish woman was spending too much time with her Rabbi in an attempt to learn as much about the Torah as she could. Her husband however was very unhappy about all the time she was spending away from home regardless of the fact that she was observing her faith, well, faithfully.
The husband vowed that he wouldn't accept his wife back until she had spit in the rabbi's face. The wife of course was horrified at the idea. The rabbi's job (as rabbi) was to somehow cause the reconciliation of the couple without the husband breaking his vow.
The rabbi one day then set up a scene where he pretended to have something in his eye. He then asked the woman to make his eye feel better by spitting in it. With some reluctance and persuasion, the woman did so and, while the rabbi seemed to have been put in an embarrassing situation by having someone spit in his face, his job was done and he did a good deed by letting her spit in his face, as the husband took his wife back since his vow was fulfilled.
The idea being, as long as its a gesture of respect, don't look a gift horse in the mouth. Regardless of tradition, as long as the person isn't insulting you or meaning to show you disrespect by not bowing or curtsying, the manner of showing that respect shouldn't be so concrete that someone becomes insulted by not being shown that respect the same way EVERY single time.
__________________
The shoe that fits one person pinches another; there is no recipe for living that suits all cases.
-Carl Gustav Jung
Do what you feel in your heart to be right for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do and damned if you don't.
-Eleanor Roosevelt
|

05-21-2008, 11:08 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: WPB FL/Muttontown NY, United States
Posts: 853
|
|
Nitefeatherz, what a lovely story!
__________________
"Me, your Highness? On the whole, I wish I'd stayed in Tunbridge Wells"
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|