 |
|

01-22-2018, 06:57 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 13,071
|
|
Jack Brooksbank: Family and Background
Welcome to Jack Brooksbanks Family and Background Thread.
This thread is for discussing Jack's family, as well as his background - career, education, etc.
|

01-22-2018, 07:06 PM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 11,507
|
|
Anyone knows Jack's exact date of birth?
It would be nice to enter him into "Birthday and Annversary wishes" thread.
|

01-22-2018, 07:41 PM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 8,740
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gawin
|
I believe Jack and Sarah are third cousins if I am not mistaken. Eugenie would be his third cousin once removed then.
|

01-22-2018, 08:11 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 11,828
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gawin
|
Very impressive work, but I was confused after about the 4th line and gave up.
To say the groom is well connected is an understatement.
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena
"If your dreams don't scare you, they are not big enough" Sir Sidney Poitier
1927-2022
|

01-22-2018, 08:15 PM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 1,504
|
|
I think he's most the "well-connected" person to marry into the BRF since Sarah Ferguson married Prince Andrew in 1986. Interesting that he's related to Eugenie through Sarah.
|

01-22-2018, 08:32 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Diana was pretty well connected, Sarah was well connected....I think Sohpie was the first one to not be as well connected of that generation.
Kate, Meghan, Mike and Autumn ..none of them are 'well connected' Very different era.
LaRae
|

01-22-2018, 08:43 PM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 1,504
|
|
In addition to being related to Sarah, Duchess of York he's also related to the late Diana, Princess of Wales and the Rt. Hon Sir Angus Ogilvy who married Princess Alexandra.
Chart 1
John Spencer 1st Earl Spencer (1734-1783)
|
Lady Georgiana Spencer (1757-1806) & 5th Duke of Devonshire
|
Lady Georgiana Cavendish (1783-1858) & 6th Earl of Carlisle
|
Lady Caroline Howard (d. 1881) & Rt. Hon. William Lascelles
|
Henrietta Lascelles (1830-1884) & 2nd Baron Chesham
|
Hon. Georgiana Cavendish (1852-1937) & Thomas Coke 2nd Earl of Leicester (1822-1909) (see chart 3, with 1st wife)
|
Maj. Hon. John Coke (1880-1957)
|
Celia Dorothy Coke (1919-1996) & Stamp Brooksbank
|
George Brooksbank (b. 1949)
|
Jack Brooksbank (b. 1986)
Chart 2
John Spencer 1st Earl Spencer (1734-1783)
|
George John Spencer 2nd Earl Spencer (1758-1834)
|
Frederick Spencer 4th Earl Spencer (1798-1857)
|
Charles Spencer 6th Earl Spencer (1857-1922)
|
John Spencer 7th Earl Spencer (1892-1975)
|
John Spencer 8th Earl Spencer (1924-1992)
|
Diana, Princess of Wales (1961-1997)
Chart 3
Thomas Coke 2nd Earl of Leicester (see chart 1, with 2nd wife) (1822-1909) & (1st wife) Juliana Whitbread (d. 1870)
|
Thomas William Coke 3rd Earl of Leicester (1848-1941)
|
Lady Alexandra Coke (1891-1984) & 7th Earl of Airlie
|
Rt. Hon. Sir Angus Ogilvy (1928-2004)
|

01-22-2018, 08:50 PM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 8,740
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter
Diana was pretty well connected, Sarah was well connected....I think Sohpie was the first one to not be as well connected of that generation.
Kate, Meghan, Mike and Autumn ..none of them are 'well connected' Very different era.
LaRae
|
Diana was one step above all the others. She was not royal, but she was the actaul daughter of an earl (i.e. first-generation "nobility" in the continental European, though not British sense) and, more importantly, came from a very old and illustrious family. She was also an illegitimate descendant of at least one sovereign of England and Scotland (Charles II).
Sarah and Jack are "gentry", which again is still one step above the likes of Kate or Sophie in the English class system. Meghan doesn't really have a "family pedigree", but, as an outsider to English society, it doesn't matter that much.
|

01-22-2018, 08:59 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 8,567
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gawin
In addition to being related to Sarah, Duchess of York he's also related to the late Diana, Princess of Wales and the Rt. Hon Sir Angus Ogilvy who married Princess Alexandra.
Chart 1
John Spencer 1st Earl Spencer (1734-1783)
|
Lady Georgiana Spencer (1757-1806) & 5th Duke of Devonshire
|
Lady Georgiana Cavendish (1783-1858) & 6th Earl of Carlisle
|
Lady Caroline Howard (d. 1881) & Rt. Hon. William Lascelles
|
Henrietta Lascelles (1830-1884) & 2nd Baron Chesham
|
Hon. Georgiana Cavendish (1852-1937) & Thomas Coke 2nd Earl of Leicester (1822-1909) (see chart 3, with 1st wife)
|
Maj. Hon. John Coke (1880-1957)
|
Celia Dorothy Coke (1919-1996) & Stamp Brooksbank
|
George Brooksbank (b. 1949)
|
Jack Brooksbank (b. 1986)
Chart 2
John Spencer 1st Earl Spencer (1734-1783)
|
George John Spencer 2nd Earl Spencer (1758-1834)
|
Frederick Spencer 4th Earl Spencer (1798-1857)
|
Charles Spencer 6th Earl Spencer (1857-1922)
|
John Spencer 7th Earl Spencer (1892-1975)
|
John Spencer 8th Earl Spencer (1924-1992)
|
Diana, Princess of Wales (1961-1997)
Chart 3
Thomas Coke 2nd Earl of Leicester (see chart 1, with 2nd wife) (1822-1909) & (1st wife) Juliana Whitbread (d. 1870)
|
Thomas William Coke 3rd Earl of Leicester (1848-1941)
|
Lady Alexandra Coke (1891-1984) & 7th Earl of Airlie
|
Rt. Hon. Sir Angus Ogilvy (1928-2004)
|
So, he is a descendent of the famous 'Duchess of Devonshire'... Thanks for this overview!
|

01-22-2018, 09:19 PM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 1,504
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno
Diana was one step above all the others. She was not royal, but she was the actaul daughter of an earl (i.e. first-generation "nobility" in the continental European, though not British sense) and, more importantly, came from a very old and illustrious family. She was also an illegitimate descendant from at least one sovereign of England and Scotland (Charles II).
Sarah and Jack are "gentry", which again is still one step above the likes of Kate or Sophie in the English class system. Meghan doesn't really have a "family pedigree", but, as an outsider to English society, it doesn't matter that much.
|
Diana was one step above in terms of her immediate ancestry but once you go back a few generations in Sarah's family, past the "gentry," you'll actually find she and Diana had roughly an equal amount of titled families. This is mainly because Diana's maternal ancestors, the Fermoys, only acquired their title in 1856 and their ancestry was middle class not aristocratic. For example, both of Sarah's grandmothers were from titled families. Her grandmother Ferguson was a granddaughter of the 6th Duke of Buccleuch who also descended from an illegitimate son of Charles II.
|

01-22-2018, 09:28 PM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 1,504
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somebody
So, he is a descendent of the famous 'Duchess of Devonshire'... Thanks for this overview!
|
Yes, and so is Eugenie, through the Duchess' illegitimate daughter by Charles Grey:
Lady Georgiana Spencer (1757-1806) (wife of 5th Duke of Devonshire) & Charles Grey 2nd Earl Grey
|
Eliza Courtney (1791-1859) & Robert Ellice
|
Eliza Ellice (1818-1899) & 1st Viscount Hampden
|
Henry Brand 2nd Viscount Hampden (1841-1906)
|
Hon. Margaret Brand (1873-1948) & Algernon Ferguson
|
Col. Andrew Ferguson (1899-1966)
|
Maj. Ronald Ferguson (1931-2003)
|
Sarah, Duchess of York (born 1959)
|
Eugenie (born 1990)
|

01-22-2018, 09:28 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,895
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno
I believe Jack and Sarah are third cousins if I am not mistaken. Eugenie would be his third cousin once removed then.
|
Jack and Sarah would be third cousins once removed, and Eugenie twice.
The second earl of Leicester had two wives and 16 children. His eldest child Julia married the 7th viscount Powercourt. Their eldest son and heir was Sarah's great-grandfather. That makes the earl Sarah's three times great grandfather. By his second wife, the earl had a son named John. John was Jack's great-grandfather, making the earl Jack's two times great-grandfather.
|

01-22-2018, 10:13 PM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 1,504
|
|
Here's another relationship, this time through the Queen Mother:
Chart 1
William Cavendish 4th Duke of Devonshire (1720-1764)
|
William Cavendish 5th Duke of Devonshire (1748-1811)
|
Lady Georgiana Cavendish (1783-1858) & 6th Earl of Carlisle
|
Lady Caroline Howard (d. 1881) & Rt. Hon. William Lascelles
|
Henrietta Lascelles (1830-1884) & 2nd Baron Chesham
|
Hon. Georgiana Cavendish (1852-1937) & Thomas Coke 2nd Earl of Leicester (1822-1909)
|
Maj. Hon. John Coke (1880-1957)
|
Celia Dorothy Coke (1919-1996) & Stamp Brooksbank
|
George Brooksbank (b. 1949)
|
Jack Brooskbank (b. 1986)
Chart 2
William Cavendish 4th Duke of Devonshire (1720-1764)
|
Lady Dorothy Cavendish (1750-94) & William Cavendish-Bentinck 3rd Duke of Portland
|
Lord Charles Cavendish-Bentinck (1780-1826)
|
Rev. Charles Cavendish-Bentinck (1817-65)
|
Cecilia Cavendish-Bentinck (1862-1938) & Claude Bowes-Lyon 14th Earl of Strathmore & Kinghorne
|
Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother (1900-2002) & King George VI
|
Queen Elizabeth II (b. 1926) & Philip Duke of Edinburgh
|
Prince Andrew Duke of York (b. 1960)
|
Eugenie (b. 1990)
|

01-23-2018, 08:04 AM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 1,504
|
|
|

01-23-2018, 09:42 AM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Lewisville, United States
Posts: 1,046
|
|
Interesting! I googled some of the names mentioned and as an aside, discovered it is actually quite common for Americans to marry into the peerage, and there have been many since Reconstruction. Fascinating history!
|

01-23-2018, 09:50 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,839
|
|
American? Isn't he English? He attended a British school according the link posted above.
|

01-23-2018, 10:07 AM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Lewisville, United States
Posts: 1,046
|
|
Yes, he is--I did say it was an aside.
The family histories are all pretty interesting.
|

01-23-2018, 10:36 AM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curbside
Interesting! I googled some of the names mentioned and as an aside, discovered it is actually quite common for Americans to marry into the peerage, and there have been many since Reconstruction. Fascinating history!
|
This is true. Americans have been marrying into the British peerage quite a bit over the years. Diana's great grandmother, Frances Work was an American heiress and socialite. There's some really interesting stories about this subject in other threads on TRF. Thelma Furness, who was a mistress to the abdicated King Edward VIII before Wallis Simpson, actually is a twin sister to Gloria Vanderbilt who is the mother of the well known CNN anchorman, Anderson Cooper.
This is what I love about TRF. Come for something as simple as a royal engagement and end up finding out all kinds of fascinating things you never would have found before.
Anyways.... back to Jack Brooksbank and his family and heritage.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

01-23-2018, 10:41 AM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Lewisville, United States
Posts: 1,046
|
|
Thanks, I'll look for the other discussions.
I'll stop my thread-jacking now. Carry on!
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|