Is there a picture of Victoria with her arm extended as in the second picture? Because in the second picture her arm is extended into a V which makes her biceps and triceps very visible (and great by the way!) but in the first picture her arms are down.Originally posted by Lena@May 19th, 2004 - 7:20 pm
Two Pics in comparison
Sorry Lena, I obviously didn't read your message clearly and missed the part about flexing the arms.Originally posted by Lena@May 19th, 2004 - 8:04 pm
You´re of course right (as always ) , Alex (that´s why I wrote that it depends on the position of the arms)...and I also can´t present pix of the both occassions which show Victoria in the very same position...but I keep at it...she looks more buff. I also thought so, when I´ve watched her at the wedding. She looked so big next to Letizia.. not chubby (I would even guess that they have the same amount of body fat-though Letizia is far more fragile), but muscular! (and this strange chiffon-part of the green dress made it even worse)
I don't think Victoria looks "fat" at all. I think she looks like a perfectly healthy young woman in her mid-20s. If Victoria looks bigger of late it is probably because she has been working out a lot lately (boyfriend who owns a gym can do that to you!). And muscle mass naturally looks bulkier and technically weighs more, but I would hardly call Victoria fat. She is in fact becoming quite toned and defined in terms of muscle mass.Originally posted by alola@May 22nd, 2004 - 11:48 pm
I think Victoria is fat now a days it's because she doesn't look well
Yes, time is running...we´re getting old And the guy from Ockelbo is still the guy from Ockelbo, but not the prince of Sweden.Josefine said:already it has been 2 years since she turned 25
Sounds as if Pappa-kungen can be a bit moody from to time (so far I´ve thought he is it only in front of ppl, but not in private )the headline is my father mutters when i am goofing around