martha-louise
Aristocracy
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2003
- Messages
- 242
- City
- Waterloo
- Country
- Belgium
The article kinda exagerated. It's stupid to respond on those critics, makes only more polemics an polarisation...
The monarchy isn't in danger just because of some critics. In every reign people have told the monarchy is in danger. Certainly when we think of Leopold II (there was a lot of criticism on his politics eg. in the Congo) Leopold III and the Royal question (remember that the Walloon people voted againt monarchy 50 years ago) after that king Baudouin with the Abortion questoin, every time the monarchy was in danger they told. But look at them, there are still their shining and glittering.
There is need of a kind of revolution among the citizens or a coup to stop a monarchistic tradition. And Flemisch critics are discussing - not to stop monarchy - but to give king Philippe just a protocol function.
And yes, maybe that will be discussed in 2007 at the next revision of state. But politicians need to change the constitution for that, so it's not that easy.
The monarchy isn't in danger just because of some critics. In every reign people have told the monarchy is in danger. Certainly when we think of Leopold II (there was a lot of criticism on his politics eg. in the Congo) Leopold III and the Royal question (remember that the Walloon people voted againt monarchy 50 years ago) after that king Baudouin with the Abortion questoin, every time the monarchy was in danger they told. But look at them, there are still their shining and glittering.
There is need of a kind of revolution among the citizens or a coup to stop a monarchistic tradition. And Flemisch critics are discussing - not to stop monarchy - but to give king Philippe just a protocol function.
And yes, maybe that will be discussed in 2007 at the next revision of state. But politicians need to change the constitution for that, so it's not that easy.