Probably!
The 'human face' she put on the monarchy turned them into a very bad soap opera, they had a human face before Diana to most people. They may have appeared distant to some, but she used her 'royal status', (through marriage I might add) to set herself up as a 'celebrity', she manipulated, deceived and worse than that encouraged the celebrity status through using the media.
As I have said in other threads, I concede that Diana did some good for some of the charities she lent her name to, this is tempered with the knowledge that to her all the problems in her life, were always someone elses fault.
BUT, the problem I have is with her 'fans', who listened to the lies she told regarding Charles, Camilla and the rest of the royal family and solely on what Diana told them, stand as judge, jury and executioner.
The marriage break up was because of Diana and Charles, but so much easier to blame someone else. Even at the wedding she informed us, she was looking for Camilla when anyone who has a big church wedding will tell you that the guests faces are a blur!
As I said, Diana didn't get on with a lot of the people who are going to be there, perhaps HM should keep a low profile, sit at the back away from her family. How about the DoE, he apparently really didn't like Diana. The list would be endless, there wouldn't be room at the back.
The fact that Camilla is willing to go, to support her husband and his sons (he apparently played a part in their conception) should be applauded.
No, it wasn't.