Yes, but who is really.
And she has a powerful lawyer -- both play the "protect their client and do it in the best interest of their client card".
As I have said rather *key word*
relatively normal life free from the public eye and the unconditional love from Albert.
Your key word relatively to me in my opinion is still far from normal
Touche!
I would have to disagree with you on this one more than anything.
Albert did and does accept his son and I sincerely doubt Albert was worried about this women breathing down his neck about his role in the child's life. Moreover, to assume that the child would be hidden away is absurd. If anything, having and being a child in the limelight is extremely difficult -- even for the adult -- trust me. It is better for the child to be taken care of away from the press to grow up in a normal enviroment; unfortunately that has been thrown out the window forever.
This is also where I disagree with you the most here as well. Hidden away was exactly what he was for 2 years.....maybe even more if she hadn't come forth. Pushed aside is what he would be as well if Albert were to marry and have children. That's what happens & this I know from experience.
The spotlight is only a little piece of dust in this whole situation.
Personally speaking, I really doubt that.
True they are there to get a scoop and she gave it to them freely; which she didn't have to do if she wanted to protect her child from them. Like I have noted before, the fact that she went public has done exactly what she stated she didn't want for her son in the first place, as noted in her talking to the press.
There is nothing wrong with what she did. If Albert hadn't lied to her about legal documents then the whole situation could have probably been avoided. I don't think for her to stay quiet and be walked all over is in the best interest of the child either. So who wins here???
No, I said it was sneaky of her if she hid the idenity of the father, famous or not, from her family. Again, I doubt Albert would have told her to keep her family in the dark. I mean it is their relative -- do you think they are not going to ask?
I think he would ask her not to say anything. He has always tried to be discreet in his personal life & this would be one way of doing that. Of course her family would ask who the father of Alexandre is and this was where the problem was.... She couldn't answer
I think the reason why she recieved such a backlash is due to the way she has handled it and the decpetive (to some) timing of it all. Right after the death of Albert's father -- a time of vulnerablity nonetheless.
understandably so, but I'm perturbed by the mere fact that everyone seems to run by Alberts calendar. Nicole had some serious issues that needed resolving in regards to Alexandre as well yet that doesn't seem to matter & she has also her own time line to run by... Should she wait and wait until its to late, or maybe thats what he wanted.
Of course, and that is the beauty of a healthy debate. We can both express our differences without verbally attacking each other. Moreover, I always like to hear other people's opinions -- it can give me insight to a totally different perspective without judgement. Did that make sense?
In the end, I appreciate/respect your comments, lashinka2002.
