It’s not an entirely apt comparison, as you well know, but it takes a little too much time and sidestepping this thread to once again explain the difference between monarchies and their royal houses, and republics, and their former residents, especially if said monarchy was abolished illegally, etc etc.
The important thing here is that the PM seems to only oppose the residential bit of the law, and not the crux of it, so Im sure that with some gentle navigation and backroom debate, this issue will be resolved. Whether the Royal House will operate from Elisabeta Palace or not is perhaps not the most important thing, but the important factor at this point in time, is to create unity in the family, so the government and republicans who inherently might oppose this, have nothing to point to when they’re looking for a publicly acceptable reason to thwart the process.
