Betsypaige
Heir Presumptive
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2010
- Messages
- 2,629
- City
- Woodbury
- Country
- United States
Well, the name is interesting....I have a headache reading that list of things they want to do. Their hearts are in the right place, I think....
Well, the name is interesting....I have a headache reading that list of things they want to do. Their hearts are in the right place, I think....
That isn't authenticated so seriously doubt it is them.
I am as ever astounded by their timing and reflective of the actions if other members family. Just because a newspaper have gotten a story does ot mean you have to speak.
It would seem Telegraph took some liberties...
https://www.today.com/popculture/pr...kle-unveil-non-profit-after-step-back-t177764
They flat out state they exaggerated some of what they printed is incorrect. I guess now that they can bring attention to false information, they will.
As for The name? It appears they wanted to use this long before Archie was thought of as the name of a joint project. It’s close to their heart. And when they had their first child they decided to play off it for his name.
ermmm... did they see that the instagram handle 'archewell' is already taken?
https://www.instagram.com/archewell/
i'm honestly started by their consistent lack of planning and foresight.
This is the correct one. It’s called Archewell Global Foundation.
https://instagram.com/archewellglobal?igshid=bvep5t5sgxnw
I'll bite. What's wrong with the timing?
I think with their PM in intensive care with Coronavirus, Britain has more pressing issues right now.
But why am I not surprised?
I think there has been a continuing theme of misjudgements on the part of H&M and their evolving team for the last year or so. One would have thought that now was not the time to make any comment at all with regard to their future plans.
They are in the US, they might not even know the PM is in IC.I think with their PM in intensive care with Coronavirus, Britain has more pressing issues right now.
But why am I not surprised?
QUOTE=Duke of Marmalade;2306309]I think with their PM in intensive care with Coronavirus, Britain has more pressing issues right now.
But why am I not surprised?
I do not see any reason whatsoever for them to say anything at this juncture. They neither represent a government, a royal house, an established charity or a body of scientific or other knowledge and expertise that people could benefit from.
They are in the US, they might not even know the PM is in IC.
And besides, if you want to wait for a moment where nothing bad is going on, you can never do anything. Something bad is always happening somewhere in the world.
They are in the US, they might not even know the PM is in IC.
And besides, if you want to wait for a moment where nothing bad is going on, you can never do anything. Something bad is always happening somewhere in the world.
They represent themselves and whatever foundation they start, that should be enough to answer a question asked by a paper and to correct wrong information published by said paper. Just imagine the world where only people representing a government, a royal house, an established charity or a body of scientific or other knowledge and expertise that people could benefit from were allowed to answer questions from the media. The Daily Mail would go out of business.
They are in the US, they might not even know the PM is in IC.
And besides, if you want to wait for a moment where nothing bad is going on, you can never do anything. Something bad is always happening somewhere in the world.
I think there has been a continuing theme of misjudgements on the part of H&M and their evolving team for the last year or so. One would have thought that now was not the time to make any comment at all with regard to their future plans.
I think with their PM in intensive care with Coronavirus, Britain has more pressing issues right now.
But why am I not surprised?
These are judgement calls, and each of us might view the situation differently from others.
When I stated my view about this perhaps not being the best time, I had not appreciated that there was a considerable amount of conversation on Twitter on this topic. I attach a link to some comments by respected journalist, Andrew Neil.
They didn’t announce anything. The Telegraph’s reporter went snooping and wrote a story. It would have been published with or without their comment. Not surprising though that people are trying to blame them. It’s very predictable and likely was the entire goal of the article. They confirmed. People are upset. Had they not commented and the papers kept focusing (as they always do) people would criticize them for that too.
Often silence can be a powerful tool.
Of course they do. It is in the news worldwide and I would assume they keep up with BBC news as well.
There is a focus on the working royals and they ARE doing their best to support the community at the moment. Its not possible for them to do active things.. but they have been as bsuy as they can be, in present circumstnaces.The US has a fairly liberal media that covers national and international news so yes as a whole the US does know that the PM is in the ICU.
U
One would think that….or at minimum focus on the WORKING royals who are reportedly supporting the community during this difficult time. Why write about something that isn’t going to happen for at least a couple of months.
Hmmm - I thought it wasn't going to be a foundation. Then again what is a foundation when it isn't a foundation?
Archewell - is a terrible name for anything. IMO. Greek roots or not. To each their own.
Hmmm - I thought it wasn't going to be a foundation. Then again what is a foundation when it isn't a foundation?