I still think she does not belong there. But then if she want's to attend and the King is ok with it i think she should not be seated in the front row but more in the background.
He's American.![]()
Thank you.![]()
Actually he is Irish-American![]()
Do you mean he has dual nationality? Or that he is an American of Irish descent?
Do you mean he has dual nationality? Or that he is an American of Irish descent?
Isn't it up to the King to decide who he wants at which ceremony? Before Delphine there was the annual fuss about what was happening with Laurent.
Do we know if Delphine will be there every year? No. Does it really matter? No. She's family; she's not a random stranger up there, that's the point.
Philippe is sending a message by not excluding her from the first National Day after they are officially siblings. That seems to matter more than prior protocol.
It is not clear to me yet if Delphine was included in the line of succession or not by the court decision. My understanding would be that she was not, but I don't think that was ever clarified. In any case, that (plus birth order) would be her only substantive difference from Astrid or Laurent. In terms of or rank or precedence, they are equals as HRH Prince/Princess of Belgium, so it would be hard to justify seating her further to the back.
Let's put it this way. This was an no-win situation for Philippe, damned if he invited her, damned if he didn't.
Public opinion wanted to see what the family would do in an occasion like this and Philippe probably thought it best to avoid any criticism for not inviting her. Or he simply wanted to mark this reconciliation/recognition through the invitation, showing to the Nation not only he acknowledges, but regards her as a member of her family close enough to be there.
And as for the comparison to Astrid's or Laurent's children who do not receive an invitation every year: unlike Delphine, they were all born princes/princesses of Belgium and their place within the family was never questioned.
But I take your point that the king is not being subjected to the same scrutiny in the court of public opinion for his treatment of his (marital) nieces and nephews as he is in relation to Princess Delphine.
Let's put it this way. This was an no-win situation for Philippe, damned if he invited her, damned if he didn't.
Public opinion wanted to see what the family would do in an occasion like this and Philippe probably thought it best to avoid any criticism for not inviting her. Or he simply wanted to mark this reconciliation/recognition through the invitation, showing to the Nation not only he acknowledges, but regards her as a member of her family close enough to be there.
And as for the comparison to Astrid's or Laurent's children who do not receive an invitation every year: unlike Delphine, they were all born princes/princesses of Belgium and their place within the family was never questioned.
Will her presence be regular from now on or will this be a one-off thing? I don't know and tbh I don't care. IMO it was a good decision to have her there.
And for why the nieces/nephews aren't treated the same way? Well, they aren't the kids of a King, aren't they? Delphine is.
Princesses Marie-Christine and Esmeralda and the late Prince Alexandre are/were children of a King, but are not treated the same way as Princess Delphine.
Princesses Marie-Christine and Esmeralda and the late Prince Alexandre are/were children of a King, but are not treated the same way as Princess Delphine.
Born of a morganatic marriage, though. In the past this meant their children could not be equal to the children born of Leopold's first marriage.
While I agree it was a sad situation, if it was someone's responsibility to fix this disparity, it was Baudouin's or Albert's.
Yes, not only was Philippe not the one in charge at the time, but Leopold's younger children never faced a word of controversy as to who their father was, nor were they ever denied princely status or a place in the royal family or a relationship with their older half-siblings.
So, no, they were not treated the same way as Delphine.
I still think she does not belong there. But then if she want's to attend and the King is ok with it i think she should not be seated in the front row but more in the background.
My post was in answer to a comment that Princess Delphine was invited to National Day while King Philippe's nieces and nephews were not because she she is a daughter of a king and they are not. The point was that this cannot be King Philippe's (only) reason, as according to the same logic his aunts would be invited as well.
Regarding Leopold's younger children and the comment about Delphine being "denied princely status or a place in the royal family", I have answered in General Questions and Informations about the Royal Family of Belgium
Born of a morganatic marriage, though. In the past this meant they could not be equal to the children born of Leopold's first marriage.
The situation changed since the times of Leopold and Lilian. People wouldn't have stood for Delphine not to be treated "equally" (in terms of protocol at least) as Marengo has said.
The fact that children of a legal, albeit morganatic, marriage were treated unequally, while a daughter born out of wedlock is now officially embraced by the Royal Family tells a lot IMHO about how society has changed in the past years.
I think it's King Philippe's way of showing that Delphine is included in the family. That's why Delphine is invited to some events where her brothers are.
In fact, the whole family seems to handle it well.
King Philippe was smart and resolved a situation that lasted for many years.
As two of Leopold and Lilian's children are still living, and the third died only 12 years ago, the explanation still leaves the question of why the changed societal situation has not changed their treatment in terms of royal protocol, unlike Delphine's.
Public opinion is divided in terms of royal duties. I've not read survey figures regarding the children of Leopold and Lilian, or Philippe's nieces and nephews, but in a survey conducted in February 2020 65% of Belgians believed that Delphine should not be given an official role if eventually recognized as Albert II's daughter.
ETA: Perhaps this discussion should be moved to the Princess Delphine thread or the General Information thread, as it is no longer about National Day specifically?
As two of Leopold and Lilian's children are still living, and the third died only 12 years ago, the explanation still leaves the question of why the changed societal situation has not changed their treatment in terms of royal protocol, unlike Delphine's.
I think it also has to do with the public perception of both Leopold and Lilian, who weren't exactly popular due to their wartime actions and other things.
Delphine won't be given any kind of official role, that has been clear from the beginning but she's the daughter of a King and the sister of another King, hence she's invited to certain public acts.
Probably because Lilian's daughters are Philippe's aunts, not his sisters. Only siblings and children of the monarch are normally officially in attendance at the National Day Parade. The question should be why they were not invited during Albert's reign.
It is sad that such a lot of threads in the Royal Forums are devoted to Delphine who here stole the show of this special National Day devoted to thre sorrow of the belgians.
From the roof to the base of the Royal Palace they placed two big flags one for the Covid and one for the inondations in Wallonia.
In my french Newspaper la Libre Belgique the Cover and 8 special pages about the now terrible devasted situation and two pages about the National Day with the King's Speech He was to change in the last Minutes and 2 small pictures of Elisabeth and Delphine without any comment.
For those interested in an overview: yes, the children have been attending the National Day celebrations for years (both parade and Te Deum): [...]