chrissy57 said:
I suspect that English isn't your first language and therefore the use of words like complication, dimension, innovation etc may be words where the nuances and differences in meaning aren't as clear to you.
You may probably be very right that English is not my first language
(hopefully you pointed not as a language discrimination but as clear as you could understand what I mentioned, thanks God for that). Although I have many other first languages other than only English, I am impressed indeed by your usage of English Language.
chrissy57 said:
Basically - we had a conversation going - you added to it with a new idea and therefore added a new complication to the scenario of Andrew and a new wife.
However to any scenario, I could understand differences between words such as
complication,
suspect,
doubt and
renounce are not good words at all, in any kind of conversation.
Those words could be isolated in meaning of world language but it still is O.K. That's very much understandable because you are using Very English.
chrissy57 said:
Do you know of a Queen who isn't currently married who could be eligible for Andrew?
There are Many Gracious Queens around the world who are young and very eligible but Royal Fans may not know they are existed. Even in United States: A Lot. But they are so busy with public works and unable to join or pay much attention to Typical Royal Society. I am thinking to move to U.S. to find one handsome prince
for myself. I better help find a princess or a queen for HRH Prince Andrew. Two more good ideas?
chrissy57 said:
Yes a Queen could marry an unmarried male who is in line to another throne however the precedent set by Prince Philip is that the prince in line to the other throne would probably have to give up his own claim.
Why did Prince Philip has to give up? because British Monarch discriminated him just of being a male prince who married to a queen female?
Seems like if Prince Philip married to a male heir like Camela married to Charles, HRH Prince Philip should have already been a Queen by now?..
chrissy57 said:
Personally I doubt if the British royals will marry a royal from a ruling house for the simple reason that they don't seem to mix all that much with them any more.
You may probably be right again that British Royals don't seem to mix all that much with a royal anymore as they now marry only to commoners all the time. We all can clearly see that it will soon become Common Monarch with too much common. Shall I say Thank God again?
Bythe way: Thanks for warm welcome, Chrissy.
Very Much Appreciated.