Dman
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2012
- Messages
- 15,827
- City
- Midwest
- Country
- United States
Gotta expect a lot of more articles, programs and conversation on Charles and Camilla, as they approach their 10th Wedding Anniversary in April.
I didn't get a hint of "hate" Camilla and Charles in this DM article.
When Charles is king where will Camilla live ?
Be pretty strange if he's at BP and she's somewhere else
He wants her to be Queen but she's wants to live at her own place.
Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
I don't think Camilla wants to live some place else, I just think that she keeps Ray Mill for her interactions with family and less formality. Does anyone think that 5 year olds can just run around in Buckingham Palace without hurting themselves or antiques?
Charles, Anne, Andrew and Edward did. Also, so did their children.
I do think Camilla will keep Ray Mill House.
Exactly - Andrew has said on several times that he and Edward raced down a specific corridor near their nursery and they kicked balls down the same corridor which had a lot of antiques in glass cabinets and they didn't manage to break anything. Kids can learn to make sure they are safe when playing.
I have no issue with her keeping the house if she wants - if it's her own house (which I assume is paid for/has already been paid for by herself) then she is entitled to it.
Ah ha, I see you have bought into the "separate lives" bit.When Charles is king where will Camilla live ?
Be pretty strange if he's at BP and she's somewhere else
He wants her to be Queen but she's wants to live at her own place.
I remember Prince Andrew doing a media piece in what looked like a long gallery with "Art" with a capital 'A', various chaise lounges, spindle legged chairs and side tables, etc. and talking about the "crashes" with their pedal cars and cringing, as an adult, about what they did around the priceless antiques and expressing surprise that they all seemed to have survived the onslaught.I don't think Camilla wants to live some place else, I just think that she keeps Ray Mill for her interactions with family and less formality. Does anyone think that 5 year olds can just run around in Buckingham Palace without hurting themselves or antiques?
Grandchildren have also been able to visit and play at BP
What's so different about Camilla's
The mere fact they are Camilla's is enough for some. Quite apart from the anti-Camilla/pro-Diana-bias some still vehemently maintain, those children do not have any Windsor blood in their veins. It is only natural that the Queen's children and grandchildren played in the rooms and corridors of BP when they were little, because that was their mother's/grandmother's home. But Camilla's grandchildren do not have Royal blood and it is not their family home. Ray Mill is, and their parents no doubt feel more comfortable there, too so I'm not at all surprised at Camilla retaining that property and spending a lot of time there.
Gullable, huh?Golly the BRF are a funny lot
Charles and Camilla are married but don't live together
Andrew and Sarah are divorced but do live together.
I merely posited the theory that Camilla might not be comfortable with her kids running around BP. My thought, not her's, not Charles, me!So Camilla's grandchildren aren't welcome even if one was in the royal wedding?
To willfully misinterpret someone's post to validate a rant against Camilla and/or Charles is not only beyond the pale, it is just plain offensive.To use her grandchildren as an excuse to not live with Charles is really beyond the pale
I am not sure why your entire post, like so many others, is so confrontational, but sniping about Camilla's children does not fall within the bounds of this thread!No one ever thinks what it must have been like for her children growing hearing all the talk about their mother and now it's the grandchildren's fault
Gullable, huh?
I merely posited the theory that Camilla might not be comfortable with her kids running around BP. My thought, not her's, not Charles, me!
To willfully misinterpret someone's post to validate a rant against Camilla and/or Charles is not only beyond the pale, it is just plain offensive.
I am not sure why your entire post, like so many others, is so confrontational, but sniping about Camilla's children does not fall within the bounds of this thread!
By the time they are living in BP, Camilla's grandchildren, probably will not be racing up and down halls.
By the time they are living in BP, Camilla's grandchildren, probably will not be racing up and down halls.
You counted them ?Richard Kay and Geoffrey Levy strike again.
The headline is states how Camilla keeps Charles happy but there are 28 mentions of Charles' ex-wife with of course her picture.
All the so called sources are unnamed.
You counted them ?
Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
You bet your booties baby! That's how people keep up with the play! After all, it is not unreasonable to expect that Charles ex wife who died 17 odd years ago would not be getting top billing in an article entitled;Richard Kay and Geoffrey Levy strike again.
The headline is states how Camilla keeps Charles happy but there are 28 mentions of Charles' ex-wife with of course her picture.
All the so called sources are unnamed.
You counted them ?
This surprises you? There are a lot of people here counting quite a few things!
Yes finding that out. ��
I understand the counting. I can promise you the person didn't count from the beginning, but after reading the article for a while and seeing a name (not related to the article) pop up time and again you might think to yourself "God, they are mentioning Diana more than Camillia) and that start you counting. It's probably not a hobbyYou bet your booties baby! That's how people keep up with the play! After all, it is not unreasonable to expect that Charle ex wife who died 17 odd years ago would not be getting top billing in an article entitled;
Separate lives and a rather saucy secret: An intimate portrait of their marriage reveals how Camilla has kept Charles happy
Read more: How Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall has kept Prince Charles happy | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Ricky and Geoffy will have to do much better than that. Next we'll be counting the number of cut-and-pastes from their previous posts.
Yeah, I know. I just said that I understand the counting since it's a little odd the dead ex-wives name being named more times than the current wife when the article is about the current wife.You can't talk about Charles and Camilla without bringing up Diana. Those were and are the two most famous and important women in his life.
I think most people can talk about Charles and Camilla's marriage without bringing up either of their ex-spouses. They have been married for many years and there are many aspects of their lives that have nothing to do with their ex-spouses.You can't talk about Charles and Camilla without bringing up Diana. Those were and are the two most famous and important women in his life.