Duchess of Durham
Courtier
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2010
- Messages
- 747
- City
- Somewhere on the East Coast.
- Country
- United States
My mind went to a dirty place far too quickly there...
Oh, Ish. You are too funny.
My mind went to a dirty place far too quickly there...
Video:
Uncle Harry to make sure Prince George 'has fun'-
Uncle Harry to make sure Prince George 'has fun' - ITV News
Listen to Prince harry talk about his little nephew.
JB @Royal_beans 29m
"The City of Prince George will proclaim July 22 each year as Prince George of Cambridge day in honour of our future King's birthday"
So that is why there were only three names.
I am impressed with William coming up with these names. (And to those that caught it.) I believe Ish was 1st on this forum.
He honored both sides of his family without actually saying what side he was actually honoring.
Very clever of William, I wonder if the RF caught this before approving the name?
He may well have decided to honor his mother by honoring her family by using their names while at the same time making it seem he was using RF names.
At first, I thought the media was doing an overkill comparing the dresses but with the names, I think both the names and the dresses were for Diana.
By City of Prince George do you mean Prince George, BC?
If so, the city has also spoken about the desire for a possible royal visit in 2015, when they're hosting the Canada Winter Games.
Yahoo! News Canada - Latest News & Headlines
Thanks for the links, but WOW 195.00 for a mug, that's a lot of money!Royal Baby range from Royal Collection Trust:
Exclusive range to celebrate the arrival of HRH Prince George of Cambridge-
Royal Baby Royal Collection Trust Shop
Pictures:
Souvenirs to celebrate the birth of baby Cambridge-
MYROYALS &HOLLYWOOD FASH
So that is why there were only three names.
I am impressed with William coming up with these names. (And to those that caught it.) I believe Ish was 1st on this forum.
He honored both sides of his family without actually saying what side he was actually honoring.
Very clever of William, I wonder if the RF caught this before approving the name?
He may well have decided to honor his mother by honoring her family by using their names while at the same time making it seem he was using RF names.
At first, I thought the media was doing an overkill comparing the dresses but with the names, I think both the names and the dresses were for Diana.
The magazine has completely lost its way!
Royal baby news: Mothers urged to boycott OK! magazine over 'vile' Kate post-baby weight front cover - Mirror Online
Royal baby: OK! magazine apologises for Kate post-baby "weight loss" front cover - Mirror Online
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice Pictures
HELLO! unveils souvenir edition to mark the birth of baby Cambridge - hellomagazine.com
Yes, apparently, in the article I linked above, the UK does not use the 5 point harness which includes a chest clip like we do in the States. Funny, I thought that that would be the norm worldwide. Live and learn.
And to think that so many entire generations of babies survived just fine travelling long distances without a car seat (myself included).
Absolutely! I remember a lot of the fun of traveling somewhere was bouncing around the back seat like a maniac! And then falling asleep and laying across the seat - no such thing as seat belts back then.
Absolutely! I remember a lot of the fun of traveling somewhere was bouncing around the back seat like a maniac! And then falling asleep and laying across the seat - no such thing as seat belts back then.
It's amazing how strict the rules are on car seats now. I am a midwife and in the UK (and I think other countries, but it's a definite in the UK) that babies are not allowed to be carried out of hospital unless in a car seat. It is a legal requirement, whether the child is being driven home or not. It is quite a recent thing though as Lady Louise travelled home in a bassinette, not a car seat.
I think the psychological impact of a child not in physical contact with a mother or father for a short time is negligible.I have always wondered what the psychological impact of these silly rules might be upon those babies thus deprived (on so many occasions) of the physical contact with the mother/father. I believe this whole "safety" craze is getting way out of hand.
I have always wondered what the psychological impact of these silly rules might be upon those babies thus deprived (on so many occasions) of the physical contact with the mother/father. I believe this whole "safety" craze is getting way out of hand.
It is interesting on how many changes there have been, though - I was telling my mom about how impressed I was that William got that baby seat in the car so fast (and in front of so many people!) and she was like "yeah, well, they're easier to put in now because the cars are built for them, you can just snap them right in!; they were a major pain back in the day!"