I know that this may tied into the rumour that Harry & Meghan were planning to leave the UK early on (i.e. early marriage or even before the wedding).
If Harry & Meghan were adamant not to live in a property that has renovation with cost from the Sovereign Grant on (i.e. Kensington Palace apartment or Frogmore Cottage), why don't they just stay in Nottingham Cottage? I get it's two bedrooms and might be a bit small with the arrival of Archie. But surely,
if the Sussexes have been planning to leave as senior working royals and the UK for a while, what is the point of moving into a different property (Frogmore Cottage or Apartment in Kensington Palace)? Wouldn't that be redundant and generate unnecessary headlines?
William, Catherine and infant George reportedly live there for a few months before moving to Apartment 1A at Kensington Palace. Prince Henry, (1st) Duke of Gloucester and the Duchess of Gloucester lived at Nottingham Cottage with their two children William (1941-1972) and Richard (b. 1944) before 1948, when it was gifted to Marion Crawford (former nanny of Princess Elizabeth and Princess Margaret).
If the Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester (as George VI's younger brother at that time) & Duchess of Gloucester could live there with his two young children temporarily, as well as William and Catherine with infant George, I don't see why Harry & Meghan cannot do the same.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...nsington-home-meghan-harry-will-live-married/
Book citation on the Gloucesters living in Nottingham Cottage before Marion Crawford: Kate Williams (historian) (10 May 2012). Young Elizabeth: The Making of our Queen. Orion Publishing Group. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-297-86782-1.