adelaide
Heir Presumptive
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2005
- Messages
- 2,100
- City
- paris
- Country
- France
The pic used to make a stamp of Crown Princes and their little baby boy is very succeful, the little prince is a very handsome and cute baby on it, smiling and totally in adecuation with the spirit of the scene.
But I find that the portrait of three genertions is a disaster!
-The idea is very good!
-The Painting of the Queen Margareth's father as landsacpe :excellent
-The Queen, "regal" in an armchair, with symbolic touches of the past: fantastic ( her teeth look more white than usual, very good imprression )
But
-The Crown Prince, as usual with a too large outfit and ugly tie ( it's obvious that Frederick is preferring casual dressing, why not ? )
But the worst,
The poor so cute baby boy dressed as if he is going to the day nursery school with his pull over looking quiet handmad by grany ( it's not a critic, sometimes it's better !) the same pants as usual ( may be he don't have many.....) ... and his shoes exactly the same than these to go at zoo to see the Koalas. It's make me cry
The little baby boys aren't dolls but for a pic which want to have an important signification, it's not possible to dress a baby as if he is going to make a walk in the park!
Mary don't seem to be very interested for the dress apparences of her husband who prefer jeans and other sport clothes but it's his job.
But for her son, she never dress him with others clothes than the casual ones. Sometimes it's totally ridiculous as this hat with a kind of two mouth'ears,( poor little boy) sometimes it's totally unappropriate as for this pic which could be a fantastic picture if the baby would be more "little Prince" and not little koala ( very sympathtetic and kind animal, I love them)
I don't understand the purpose because all the Royal Families in Europe when they did/do this kind of symbolic picture take care of the precious "todler "
I have to pay attention because my words but sometimes the most beautiful babies of the world can be damaged by an error of dressing
But I find that the portrait of three genertions is a disaster!
-The idea is very good!
-The Painting of the Queen Margareth's father as landsacpe :excellent
-The Queen, "regal" in an armchair, with symbolic touches of the past: fantastic ( her teeth look more white than usual, very good imprression )
But
-The Crown Prince, as usual with a too large outfit and ugly tie ( it's obvious that Frederick is preferring casual dressing, why not ? )
But the worst,
The poor so cute baby boy dressed as if he is going to the day nursery school with his pull over looking quiet handmad by grany ( it's not a critic, sometimes it's better !) the same pants as usual ( may be he don't have many.....) ... and his shoes exactly the same than these to go at zoo to see the Koalas. It's make me cry
The little baby boys aren't dolls but for a pic which want to have an important signification, it's not possible to dress a baby as if he is going to make a walk in the park!
Mary don't seem to be very interested for the dress apparences of her husband who prefer jeans and other sport clothes but it's his job.
But for her son, she never dress him with others clothes than the casual ones. Sometimes it's totally ridiculous as this hat with a kind of two mouth'ears,( poor little boy) sometimes it's totally unappropriate as for this pic which could be a fantastic picture if the baby would be more "little Prince" and not little koala ( very sympathtetic and kind animal, I love them)
I don't understand the purpose because all the Royal Families in Europe when they did/do this kind of symbolic picture take care of the precious "todler "
I have to pay attention because my words but sometimes the most beautiful babies of the world can be damaged by an error of dressing