The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 11-22-2020, 02:04 AM
Suzzanah's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hallsville, United States
Posts: 39
Duty and Title

There is much chatter about titles on the web for several royals. In general a prince and princess are birth titles. Titles of domain like a Duchy or Duke however have duties. Many years back discussion about the Marlboro title was presented. As an American I believe those with titles of domain should have duties. They should have stipends as well. There is always more work than money though it seems. The princes should remain so but hand over the other titles that they are not serving. Lady Sara should hand over hers as well.

Prince Harry should be in the nova scotia titles now so he can serve his queen in Canada. Prince Andrew seems retired out but should create a new life with person he can trust. Perhaps a new venue would help him.

Lady Sara should find a new love and marry.

The queen has so much to worry about with covid right now? Perhaps the kids can settle down a bit.

Family ties are thicker than blood, but protocol has men and women waiting to serve her majesty. I hope they will let them. Creation of jobs is crucial now.the world economy is important.

Princess Anne once said, I have been asked to give up my title would you? My response was this, I am decendant of the Duke of Leeds the fifth and I was born in 1963. The title was dissolved in 1964 so that London could have a park. They had no heir supposedly. I never had the chance to claim my title as I was a baby. So I am not the right one to ask.

Perhaps chatter and gossip are just that!
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-22-2020, 02:54 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 12,845
Outside of the royal family there are very few titles that have any official duties. They are private citizens who happen to also have a title - many going back many centuries. These men usually have large estates to manage e.g. The Duke of Marlborough has the Blenheim estate to manage and that is a massive job. The estate doesn't even cover to costs of the maintenance of Blenheim Palace so the Palace has to be opened to the public to ensure that there is sufficient money coming in to maintain the palace (and he doesn't have to pay rent - only give a flag to The Queen on the anniversary of the Battle of Blenheim).

The Dukedom of Leeds wasn't dissolved but became extinct as there was no male heir. A son via a female isn't a male heir. Only a son born to a son is an heir. The 11th Duke died in 1963 without a male heir so the title passed to his 2nd cousin, who himself died 8 months later having never married. He was the last male line claimant. The 11th Duke married three times and had one daughter, who, as a girl, couldn't inherit the title. That daughter, herself, had two daughters. The 10th Duke had one son, who became the 11th Duke who was the second last Duke. The male heirs to the Duke of Leeds are easy enough to find as there aren't that many so any claim you think you had doesn't add up

My family's title went extinct in 2001 when the Viscount died with two daughters who between them had five sons but as there were only two daughters none of the sons could inherit their grandfather's title.

That is the same thing that will happen with York - if Eugenie's baby is a boy he won't be able to inherit York as Eugenie is a girl.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-22-2020, 03:06 AM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suzzanah View Post
There is much chatter about titles on the web for several royals. In general a prince and princess are birth titles. Titles of domain like a Duchy or Duke however have duties. Many years back discussion about the Marlboro title was presented. As an American I believe those with titles of domain should have duties. They should have stipends as well. There is always more work than money though it seems. The princes should remain so but hand over the other titles that they are not serving. Lady Sara should hand over hers as well.

Prince Harry should be in the nova scotia titles now so he can serve his queen in Canada. Prince Andrew seems retired out but should create a new life with person he can trust. Perhaps a new venue would help him.

Lady Sara should find a new love and marry.

The queen has so much to worry about with covid right now? Perhaps the kids can settle down a bit.

Family ties are thicker than blood, but protocol has men and women waiting to serve her majesty. I hope they will let them. Creation of jobs is crucial now.the world economy is important.

Princess Anne once said, I have been asked to give up my title would you? My response was this, I am decendant of the Duke of Leeds the fifth and I was born in 1963. The title was dissolved in 1964 so that London could have a park. They had no heir supposedly. I never had the chance to claim my title as I was a baby. So I am not the right one to ask.

Perhaps chatter and gossip are just that!

Lady Sarah? The only Lady Sarah is Lady Sarah Chatto. She has no title to hand over. And I would think her husband Daniel would have an issue with her finding a new love of any kind.

If you are talking about Fergie, she is not Lady Sarah. She is not like Diana, she wasn't born to the nobility. She is Sarah, Duchess of York. Duchess of York is not a title she can give up. It's literally her last name. Like other divorced women, unless she remarries, she uses her former surname.


The Duchies don't come with duties. They don't come with lands or stipends of any kind. The Duke of Gloucester and Kents sons will be private citizens and will be non-royal dukes like the Duke of Marlborough or Duke of Northumberland. They will not even have an estate to over see. There are no duties that they are forgoing, that they are not over seeing.


Being a duke is not a 'job'. Its not about retiring off Andrew and Harry to create new 'jobs in the economy'. These are royal positions, honorary titles that come with their birth and marriage. The queen isn't going to hand over the Duke of Sussex to someone else to 'create a job' in the economy.

BRF don't have 'stipends'. There used to be the civil list which working royals got paid from. Now there is simply the sovereign's grant. The queen gets her money from the Duchy of Lancaster estates and Charles from the Duchy of Cornwall. Any money for William, Edward and so on comes from the queen and Charles, not from any government stipend directly to them.

You need to do a little bit more reading on how titles are inherited in the UK.


The Duke of Leeds didn't get 'taken away to make a park'. The title was only inheritable by heirs male of the 1st duke. There were no male heirs left. The last duke had inherited the title from his second cousin. If you are descended from the line you must be from a female line. Just like Eugenie's children can not inherit York any more then she can, female line grandchildren or so on can not either for Leeds.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-22-2020, 04:13 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suzzanah View Post
There is much chatter about titles on the web for several royals. In general a prince and princess are birth titles. Titles of
Prince Harry should be in the nova scotia titles now so he can serve his queen in Canada. Prince Andrew seems retired out but should create a new life with person he can trust. Perhaps a new venue would help him.

Lady Sara should find a new love and marry.

The queen has so much to worry about with covid right now? Perhaps the kids can settle down a bit.

Family ties are thicker than blood, but protocol has men and women waiting to serve her majesty. I hope they will let them. Creation of jobs is crucial now.the world economy is important.

Princess Anne once said, I have been asked to give up my title would you? My response was this, I am decendant of the Duke of Leeds the fifth and I was born in 1963. The title was dissolved in 1964 so that London could have a park. They had no heir supposedly. I never had the chance to claim my title as I was a baby. So I am not the right one to ask.

Perhaps chatter and gossip are just that!
I dont really know what you mean. Titles and how they are inherited are part of UK law and its for the citizens of the UK to decide if they want any changes. And the royal titles and succession have nothing to do with the "creation of jobs". Working royals don't have "jobs". The title of Duke of Leeds wasn't "abolished".. it has died out because there were no male heirs. I dont know what you mean by "so London could have a park". There are plenty of parks in London and they have nothing to do with how many dukes there are.
I dont know of Anne ever saying that she'd been asked ot give up her title and I doubt if it was ever suggested.
As for Harry and Andrew... Andrew has had to retire, because of the scandals he's caused and he will never undertake royal duties again.. IMO.
And Harry does not live in Canada, he is living in the US and has given up royal duties.
Lady Sara if you mean Sarah Duchess of York is very unlikely to find a new love and marry..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-22-2020, 04:47 AM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,282
I too wonder about how Leeds was used to make a park, and which park?

The 11th Duke sold the family estate and he basically squandered most of their fortune before he died. He was succeeded by his second cousin the last Duke. But the 12th Duke didn't inherit what was left of the family estate, just the title. The 11th Duke had a daughter who inherited what was left of the family money which was about a million pounds, and an annual allowance from a family trust.

The 12th duke spent his later life living in Rome and his financial situation was precarious at best. He lived comfortably due to financial support from friends including the Queen mother.

Not sure what the imagine estate used to build a park was.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-22-2020, 05:32 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 787
Some families with titles and/or who also own their historic family seat do still care about their role in the community whether it's official or unofficial and care about the estate making money and conservation and whatever else, I've seen it first hand.

Many others don't and it's not and never has been a requirement.

In the royal family there hasn't been any direct connection to a geographical area with their titles for a long, long time. With the possible exception of the POW and his work with the Duchy of Cornwall and business and other interests there.

No one expected Harry to be given a house in Sussex and start creating jobs there or Andrew having nothing to do with York except some Northern honorary military appointments and Chancellorships. He certainly could marry a younger woman and have more children if he wanted and try and pass his title on that way but he's given absolutely no indication that that is a priority in the years since the divorce. Passing on titles to a female heir is still a matter of huge debate in certain sections of the UK and gets brought up regularly as Private Members' Bills in Parliament. Nothing has changed so far and HM doesn't seem interested in entering that debate by giving her HRH Granddaughters Dukedoms or Earldoms in their own right either.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-22-2020, 06:08 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,230
I think that families who have retained their estates and stately homes and live there, are inclined to do some "in the community" activiites and to still retain a sense of noblesse oblige. Others, as with all groups of people dont care or do much, or are preoccupied with the problems of maintaining a big house in today's world. It takes work, and concentrating on making money to keep things going. Charles does have a connection with his duchy, but he also owns property in other parts of the country.. but he does try to use the Duchy to help the people who live within it, as well as to increase the income. But the Duke of Leeds has nothing to do iwth London parks!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-22-2020, 06:25 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 6,409
Maybe the OP is thinking of the situation that existed in the past when there were still many sovereign dukes or grand dukes. That system survived for example in Italy until Italian unification in the 19th century and in Germany until the early 20th century when the monarchy was abolished.

Nowadays there are in practice only two countries in Europe ( the UK and Spain) where the title of Duke is still legally recognized and held by people outside the Royal Family and, in both cases, the title is purely honorific. For historical reasons, many dukes,, marquesses ( marquises in the continent) and earls still own large land estates, especially in the UK, but those are just private property and not fiefdoms that come with a sovereign grant and obligations to the Crown as it used to be the case under the feudal system, which, I believe, was legally abolished in England in the early modern age.

There is also a handful of ducal families in Belgium, but the dukedoms in the Low Countries are not indigenous titles granted by the kings of Belgium or the Netherlands , but preexisting titles that were held by Low Countries families, generally in the Holy Roman Empire, and were then recognized by the monarchs of the Netherlands or Belgium.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"On Duty With The Queen" by Dickie Arbiter (2014) Pranter Royal Library 78 10-11-2014 09:35 PM
Prince Harry's Tour of Duty in Afghanistan: December 2007-February 2008 karla64 The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Family 321 04-01-2008 02:55 AM
Royal Moms On Duty Humera Royal Life and Lifestyle 47 06-26-2007 11:15 AM




Popular Tags
abdication althorp baby names biography bridal gown british royal family brownbitcoinqueen canada carolin chittagong clarence house diana princess of wales dna dubai dutch earl of snowdon facts fantasy movie future general news thread george vi gradenigo hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hill historical drama history hochberg hypothetical monarchs intro italian royal family jewellery list of rulers mail mary: crown princess of denmark mountbatten names nepalese royal jewels northern ireland norway palestine pless prince dimitri princess alexia (2005 -) princess chulabhorn walailak princess eugenie princess laurentien princess of orange queen elizabeth ii queen louise queen mathilde random facts royal court royal dress-ups royal jewels royal marriage royal re-enactments. royalty of taiwan royal wedding royal wedding gown serbian royal family snowdon spencer family thailand thai royal family tips tracts uae customs united states of america wittelsbach working royals; full-time royals; part-time royals;


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:56 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2020
Jelsoft Enterprises
×