UserDane
Royal Highness
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2004
- Messages
- 1,969
Too short again Whoever told Victoria it would look good on her to spend her pregnancy in only short dresses deserves a spanking with a wet Sunday paper!
I guess this dress isn't maternity clothing?
If it was, the hem would not rise so high in the front.
Ohhh that hair..please, please cut it!!!
Looking through the recent sites of the thread I keep thinking does maternity fashion have to be so ugly, shapeless and sloppy?
(Someone mentioned Victoria Beckham as an example of how to get it right, but I think she looked ridiculous at the Royal Wedding in April; those heels were nothing short of dangerous for a pregnant woman, even if they were specially designed.)
You would be surprised but Louboutins are surprisingly comfortable.I don't know if it has to be, but it seems like it usually is!
(Someone mentioned Victoria Beckham as an example of how to get it right, but I think she looked ridiculous at the Royal Wedding in April; those heels were nothing short of dangerous for a pregnant woman, even if they were specially designed.)
I wish some top designers would come out with a line of maternity wear that is both practical and attractive; surely that isn't an impossible feat?
Ohhh that hair..please, please cut it!!!
Kellydofc said:I have a feeling that Victoria is one of those women who prefers not to show off her belly while she's pregnant. Really I don't think that there's anything wrong with that.
And that can maybe be traumatic for her with her history of Anorexia.Agree. Especially as cameras now seem automatically focussed on her tummy wherever she goes.
Esmerelda said:Agree. Especially as cameras now seem automatically focussed on her tummy wherever she goes.
_____________________
Crown Princess Victoria at the Royal Academy of Music ceremonial meeting in Stockholm
yesterday, November 28, wearing a long blue dress she's worn before in August at the
Polar music prize:
** Full view ** Upper part ** Close up ** August 2011 **