Prinsara
Heir Apparent
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
- Messages
- 5,050
- City
- A place to grow
- Country
- Canada
No word on the cause of death? As it’s not an entirely unexpected one, you’d think someone might say.
I have the texts and photos of the letters if anyone wants them.
Out of curiosity: what did the document say about VE's position? Or did they only write in their letter what it did not say?
The undersigned heirs of H.M. the King, Umberto II, recognize that Prince Vittorio-Emanuele, as Head of the House of Savoy, is Grand Master of the Most Holy Order of the Annunciation and the Order of Saints Maurice and Lazarus, and that he is the keeper of the Great Collars of the Order aforementioned.
Cascais, 5 December 1983
Marie José
Maria Pia of Savoy
Maria Gabriella of Savoy
Maria Beatrice of Savoy
Simeon of Saxe-Coburg
Moritz of Hesse
Guibert d'Udekem
Lausanne, 7 Dec. 1983
Thanks for the explanation Benjamin and attached note. But I still have trouble following it
- In 1983 they signed a paper where it says that they recognise VE as head of the house.
- 20 years later [after Q. Marie José died] they write a letter where they claim not to have signed such thing?
The statement from 1983 seems clear: they say that their brother is the head of the house of Savoy. Do you know what do they claim they signed in 1983 if not exactly that? They feel that the statement was falsified?
Dear ------,
(Personal communications)
As for my Father's last will and testament, I can confirm that my sisters and I made a declaration in Vittorio's favour in regard to the dynastic orders, to prevent his feeling entirely excluded from the moral heritage of our House as resulted from the King's dispositions. We put our signatures to this declaration on 5 December 1983, but, on further consideration, neither we, nor our mother, nor the executors of the will, had the power to do so.
Affectionately,
8 III 2005
Maria Gabriella
Dear Ella,
Having read your letter of the eighth of March 2005 about our recognition in Vittorio’s favour concerning the question of the Orders, I find myself entirely in agreement.
I embrace you, Maria Beatrice
31 March 2007
09.05.2007
Dear Ella and Titti,
Being aware of certain speculations on the part of the press concerning the letter of 5 December 1983 of which we were the joint signatories, I wish to confirm that my participation should not be understood as an opportunity to express any kind of value that could be of use to the dynastic succession of your House; particularly as the document exclusively regarded the custody of the Great Collars of the Most Holy Annunciation.
Your old and very affectionate cousin,
Simeon
MORITZ LANDGRAF VON HESSEN
22 May 2007
Princess Maria Gabriella of Savoy
Dear Ella,
The letter dated 5 December 1983, which we issued after the will of King Umberto II was opened, has recently become widely know to the public, but for purposes that have no connection whatever with those originally intended. Actually its sole purpose was to allow Vittorio Emanuele temporary custody of the Great Collars of the Most Holy Annunciation, and was certainly not meant to imply any kind of dynastic recognition. All the more so since it had nothing at all to do with the King’s will, but merely to satisfy an incidental and provisional need, as Vittorio Emanuele knew perfectly well when he accepted the task on this understanding. Besides this it is quite obvious that none of the signatories had the power to confer roles and positions of the House of Savoy, or to change the will of the King.
Cordially,
Moritz
Thank you for the copies of the letters. I do not remember seeing/reading them before. A most interesting case.
So it seems the princesses changed their mind, which I suppose can happen after 20 years. I imagine loyalty to their mother -who AFAIK supported her son- also may have incite them to sign the original statement.
I do not find the argument of the Bulgarian King all that convincing, though I understand his wish to stay out of such a matter. It seems that Landgrave Moritz claims he only agreed on the order to be headed by the Prince of Napels but that he did not want to say anything about the headship of the family.
Given the unfortunate reputation of the Prince, I am not sure if his royal cousins such as Simeon, Philippe and Henri will attend the funeral. Maybe King Albert and Queen Paola will be there. I don’t expect other royal houses to be represented either, but it remains to be seen.
Agree. Maybe just a few from minor and non-reigning royal families. I don’t expect Kings or their close relatives to attend.Could be that Prince Albert of Moanco will attend. He is close to Emanuele Filiberto and his Wedding Vittorio Emanuele and Marina as well as Emanuele Filiberto and Clotilde attended.
I wonder which of the several royal families he’s referring to. I’m sure Belgium, maybe Luxembourg offered condolences and of course Monaco, but unless the majority of the other houses who sent condolences are non-reigning.Agree. Maybe just a few from minor and non-reigning royal families. I don’t expect Kings or their close relatives to attend.
However, Prince Emanuele Filiberto said yesterday night that several royal families called him to express their condolences and was very grateful for that.
They are looking for a Church in Turin large enough because the Basilica of Superga is rather small for all the people in attendance.
UPDATE: the Funeral is to be held at the Cathedral of Turin. It’s a meaningful Church for the House and there the Holy Shroud (gifted to the Church by King Umberto II) is preserved.
On 5 December 1983 at Cascais, the widowed Queen Marie-José of Italy as well as her daughters Princess Maria Pia, Princess Maria Gabriella, and Princess Maria Beatrice all signed a statement purporting to recognise their son/brother Vittorio Emanuele as Head of the Royal House of Savoy. The statement was co-signed by the three executors of the late king's will. It was filed at Lausanne on 7 December 1983. The English translation of the statement read as follows:
The later letters of the sisters and cousins (who were executors of King Umberto's will) state that they were not recognizing Vittorio Emanuele as Head of House Savoy, and that they did not have the ability to do so anyway. Clearly, the statement was worded in such a way as that they did recognize him as the Head of the House, but once the split happened in 2006, then they revised their position.
Is the aforementioned Guibert d'Udekem a member of the same family as Queen Mathilde? Just curious.
Thank you for the copies of the letters. I do not remember seeing/reading them before. A most interesting case.
So it seems the princesses changed their mind, which I suppose can happen after 20 years. I imagine loyalty to their mother -who AFAIK supported her son- also may have incite them to sign the original statement.
I do not find the argument of the Bulgarian King all that convincing, though I understand his wish to stay out of such a matter. It seems that Landgrave Moritz claims he only agreed on the order to be headed by the Prince of Napels but that he did not want to say anything about the headship of the family.
The undersigned heirs of H.M. the King, Umberto II, recognize that Prince Vittorio-Emanuele, as Head of the House of Savoy, is Grand Master of the Most Holy Order of the Annunciation and the Order of Saints Maurice and Lazarus, and that he is the keeper of the Great Collars of the Order aforementioned.
No word on the cause of death? As it’s not an entirely unexpected one, you’d think someone might say.
I wonder which of the several royal families he’s referring to. I’m sure Belgium, maybe Luxembourg offered condolences and of course Monaco, but unless the majority of the other houses who sent condolences are non-reigning.
According to his son Emanuele Filiberto, VE, who had been frail for some time, was hospitalized after developing a severe infection in his leg, which weakened his vital functions. He was "close to the end" on Thursday, then there was a slight improvement in his condition, but he eventually passed away on Saturday morning.
Here's EF's interview to Il Corriere Della Sera:
https://www.corriere.it/cronache/24...ta-e9170312-c390-11ee-ab83-02c4d4315342.shtml
In the same interview, he mentions receiving condolences from the Royal Families of "Spain, Belgium, Monaco and Iran".
As far as I know, the Minister of Defense sent his Condolences to Prince Emanuele Filiberto. I don’t expect much more. VE was a rather controversial figure in Italy and abroad. I see why even close Royal families are not making public condolences to the Savoys. But I am glad private calls and condolences have been made.Did he receive any condolences from the government of the Italian Republic? I wouldn't expect that given the Republic's treatment of the Savoy family.
As far as I know, the Minister of Defense sent his Condolences to Prince Emanuele Filiberto.
He did indeed, but it seemed to me more of a personal message rather than an official message coming from a member of the government.
It is indeed a personal message. As said the Government and the Presidency are not interested in the Monarchy.To me, it seems quite a personal message rather than an institutional one.
This is the link to the tweet containing the condolence message:
And this is its translation:
"Dear Emanuele, my deepest condolences to you and your family on the passing of your dear father Vittorio Emanuele. I remember him fondly and remember the many times that, in Piedmont, I was able to share his company. A strong hug."
To me, it seems quite a personal message rather than an institutional one.
The coffin of Coffin of Vittorio Emanuele of Savoy arrived at Sant'Uberto Chapel in Turin this morning, February 9:
** gettyimages gallery: ITA: H.S.R. Vittorio Emanuele Of Savoy Mourning **
VENARIA REALE, ITALY - FEBRUARY 09: H.R.H. Emanuele Filiberto, Duke of Savoy and Prince of Venice mourns the loss of H.S.R. Vittorio Emanuele of Savoy at Sant'uberto Chapel on February 09, 2024 in Turin, Italy. (Photo by Vittorio Zunino Celotto/Getty Images)