General News & Information: Prince Albert & Princess Charlene 1: July 2011 - Feb.2012


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
See posts with no answers
Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's not speculate about the fertility of Charlene. Unless there are reputable sources, any and all additional posts will be deleted without notice.
 
Monaco has many legal airs: PC and her family, PS and her family minus Camille, and all of the DeMasseys.
 
Are Charlene and Albert vegetarians or vegans? I mean, do they eat fish or other things coming from animals like butter, eggs, etc...? Or do they just don't eat meat?
 
Smush said:
Are Charlene and Albert vegetarians or vegans? I mean, do they eat fish or other things coming from animals like butter, eggs, etc...? Or do they just don't eat meat?
Click to expand...
She says calls herself a vegetarian and Albert is not unless he changed after he was married.
 
Albert is not a vegetarian? Oh, I thought he was.
So Charlene does eat fish? Ok, that's what I was wondering about.
Thx!
 
Siiiigh .... just because the "usual suspects" don't feel affection for Princess Charlene does NOT mean that the people of Monaco do not feel affection for her.

The same question I have asked before .... why do those who so very obviously dislike Princess Charlene, and apparently Prince Albert as well (now .... was that before he married Charlene, or only after?) continue to come onto this forum and spew their venom? It's a puzzle! If I disliked these people so very much, I wouldn't be interested in them. Again, it seems a case of obsession and nothing more. Very sad indeed. :ermm:
 
It is PA and PC's job to create publicity for Monaco. Be in the public eye. One of the ways they do this is thru foundations. They throw these lavish dinners that cost 1,000 per head and wealthy people come from all over the world to attend them. If they also raise money for a charity, that's a bonus. Bringing business to Monaco is their objective but they would never admit that.
 
rosana said:
I don´t see the need for a PCFoundation. The Princess Grace Foundation was created in 1964, almost 10 years after Grace arrival in the principality, by then people loved and admired her.
M. Witstock has born a title for 3 months, does not speak proper French and I don´t need to go on with all her faux-pas. There is no reason in Monaco to feel the least affection for her, but yet she will have her headlines with the future foundation. This is not how one works for the ones in need, this is publicity, once more. Everything this couple does is to promote themselves and it´s even more disgusting because they use the "charity" excuse to do so.
Click to expand...

So if certain people don't like her, she can't help? :eek: Ok, she is not perfect but if she can help to do a better world with her foundation. Why not? I absolutely see nothing bad. When it is about charity, I absolutely don't mind of who is helping or not, we have to think of who is in need, and that is all matter.
 
titiromi said:
So if certain people don't like her, she can't help? :eek: Ok, she is not perfect but if she can help to do a better world with her foundation. Why not? I absolutely see nothing bad. When it is about charity, I absolutely don't mind of who is helping or not, we have to think of who is in need, and that is all matter.
Click to expand...
Very well said !
 
Charlene said in a interview on a sud african radio that she is vegetarian. But I do not know if prince Albert is also vegetarian.
 
Publicity or not,her foundation is going to help the less fortunate people ,which is all that counts.
 
Princess of Durham said:
Siiiigh .... just because the "usual suspects" don't feel affection for Princess Charlene does NOT mean that the people of Monaco do not feel affection for her.

The same question I have asked before .... why do those who so very obviously dislike Princess Charlene, and apparently Prince Albert as well (now .... was that before he married Charlene, or only after?) continue to come onto this forum and spew their venom? It's a puzzle! If I disliked these people so very much, I wouldn't be interested in them. Again, it seems a case of obsession and nothing more. Very sad indeed. :ermm:
Click to expand...


What you call venom, I call criticism. Instead of spweing your venom to posters, why don´t you try explaining the need of creating a foundation with her name. I repaet, she´s born the tilte for 3 months, her marriage started with a scandal, and her "love sroty" only makes tabloid covers among rumors of every kind.

FanofMonaco said:
It is PA and PC's job to create publicity for Monaco. Be in the public eye. One of the ways they do this is thru foundations. They throw these lavish dinners that cost 1,000 per head and wealthy people come from all over the world to attend them. If they also raise money for a charity, that's a bonus. Bringing business to Monaco is their objective but they would never admit that.
Click to expand...

That is not the way of creating publicity for the country. It is a way of promoting themselves, and I doubt this is Albert´s idea. Why doesn´t she work on behalf of Princess Grace Foundation? Why doesn´t she wait until she has done some merits to deserve such an honor? P. Caroline does not have a foundation, and she´s been working for P. Pierre F, PGF, Amade Mondiale, and other organizations for decades. It would be selfish and conceited to create a foundation with her name.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Princess charlene will make her own fondation, and it is a good thing for the people who are poor. I think it is not necessary to compare princess Charlene with Princess Grace or princess Caroline, they are different persons.
Princess Charlene swam and raised founds for south Africa special olympics in february, and if she wanted publicity for her, we would get photos about the travel of princely at the Nepal with the association Namaste around all the world.
For the scandal around the wedding, I recall you, that it was only rumors. that this story was made by newspaper. Princess Charlene did not try to fly to South Africa and The story about the test of paternity is not true. There is a report of french police which says that there was not try of escape and where is the mother who wanted the test? No signs about that but there will be a process again the newspaper Express and than we will know the verity. The newspapers begin to say that the sources are anonymous and it is not a proove and it could be a story made by some persons who were jalious at the time of the wedding
 
LadyMacAlpine said:
Unless he has changed since they were married he is not.
Click to expand...
Ok. Then I was wrong. I thought they both are vegetarian :)

The same question I have asked before .... why do those who so very obviously dislike Princess Charlene, and apparently Prince Albert as well (now .... was that before he married Charlene, or only after?) continue to come onto this forum and spew their venom? It's a puzzle! If I disliked these people so very much, I wouldn't be interested in them. Again, it seems a case of obsession and nothing more. Very sad indeed. :ermm:
Click to expand...
Very well said!!!!!!!!!!!
From my point of view it's pure envy and jealousy. Nothing more, nothing less!
 
Last edited:
I don't know why whenever Charlene is criticised it has to be jealosy and envy.
I really don't understand.
What, Charlene can't be criticized? And if it is, is because people is envy and jealous? That's not a good explanation, sorry...
 
Nathalie Cox said:
I don't know why whenever Charlene is criticised it has to be jealosy and envy.
I really don't understand.
What, Charlene can't be criticized? And if it is, is because people is envy and jealous? That's not a good explanation, sorry...
Click to expand...
Because that is exactly what it comes across as even if someone claims they are not.
 
Sure she can be critized. But we all know that rosana ist NO fan of her and talks everything down Charlene does.
 
LadyMacAlpine said:
Because that is exactly what it comes across as even if someone claims they are not.
Click to expand...

What?
She is a public figure. She will be critized by some, and liked by some.
Sure, maybe there are people that is jealous/envy of her, but not everybody has to be jealous of her. Some people see her as not appropiate for the job.
I know i see her that way, and i know i'm not jealous of her.
According to some, everybody is jealous of her. Why? What does she have to make other jealous? Happines?? Don't seem so. Jewels? Big deal.

This of supposing that everybody is jealous of her comes from fans of her.
 
I ask myself why the persons who dislike so much Charlene come on this forum, when I do not like the princess or the prince of a country, I do not go on the forum of the country, I do not lost my time in critics about this persons, I do not read the news about these persons.
On this board, there are not only fans about Charlene ,there are also neutral persons who sometimes critic her and sometimes say that what she does , is good.They do not critic her always
I think that Charlene is more happy than you because the hate about a person makes you very unhappy.
 
melina premiere said:
I ask myself why the persons who dislike so much Charlene come on this forum, when I do not like the princess or the prince of a country, I do not go on the forum of the country, I do not lost my time in critics about this persons, I do not read the news about these persons.
On this board, there are not only fans about Charlene ,there are also neutral persons who sometimes critic her and sometimes say that what she does , is good.They do not critic her always
I think that Charlene is more happy than you because the hate about a person makes you very unhappy.
Click to expand...
Was this directed to me?
Look melina, glad you like Charlene, but i'm being neutral with her lately.
And, you saying that Charlene is happier than me because i "hate" her...well, you are not being nice at all. I thought the forum was about to criticized/admired the royals, not the posters...
 
Last edited:
Smush said:
Ok. Then I was wrong. I thought they both are vegetarian :)


Very well said!!!!!!!!!!!
From my point of view it's pure envy and jealousy. Nothing more, nothing less!
Click to expand...


And that is your argument to refute my criticism of her selfishness in creating a new unnecessary foundation? Would you be so kind as to name all the wonderful attributes that are so worthy of envy? Perhaps that fact that she was never happy with her looks and decided to drastically look different? Perhaps living monitored and controlled in a tiny place where she has to ask permission to do everything? Or surely her academic achievements and her gift for languages!!!!! Perhaps the easiness to communicate with people and the charisma, joy and happiness she radiates in every picture! Am I forgetting something?
Of course, the most important, if I criticize I must envy her status, position and fame. And I DO NOT, so please, this "envy and jealousy" excuse is starting to sound hackneyed and unfunded. We are not all like her!
 
Last edited:
___________________



We are going round in circles again and are repeating the same old discussion that doesn't lead us anywhere
but in arguments only. Please respect both negative and positive sentiments! There is no need for another
debate on principles, we should agree to disagree and move on. Thanks!
 
I have to admit that I don't really feel the need for her foundation as well. True.
But I'm not in the position to make decisions if necessary or not or criticize her for that.
I bet she has good reasons and people around her to help her with that.
She doesn't need advice from outsiders like us!
 
Just a thought, but could it be that Princess Charlene does not want to be compared to Princess Grace, thus her own foundation?
 
I'm pretty sure of that.
In many interviews she said that she doesn't like to be compared with Grace and that everyone has it'n own personalities.
I guess that's one of the reasons she wanted this foundation. So she can do good in her way and her name.
 
Whats the big deal about there being a Princess Charlene Foundation? The PG Foundation supports the arts and presumably the Princess Charlene Foundation will be in aid of something else. How can this be a negative or an opportunity for criticism? Charity and support of good causes is after all one of the principle functions of royalty. Did anyone feel the need the criticize PA for the Prince Albert Foundation?
 
I don't think it's a big deal for her having a Foundation. I just say that maybe is too early to give her one, IMO. But, eventually she was about to have one.
Probably it will be related to special olympics, i guess.
 
In the US, foundations are set up not only to provide charity but to provide tax relief. Monaco doesn't have personal income tax, but if Charlene receives income from other countries she could avoid foreign taxes by channeling her income to her foundation. At least she would have control of how the money is spent. Maybe that is why PG had 2 PG foundations; one in the US and one in France.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

iceflower
Prince Albert & Princess Charlene Current Events Part 6: January 2024 -
Replies
15
Views
4K
iceflower
iceflower
Marengo
Princess Elisabeth, Duchess of Brabant News and Events 2, Feb 2024 -
2
Replies
56
Views
10K
Countessmeout
Countessmeout
iceflower
General News about King Carl Gustaf & Queen Silvia Part 2: January 2024 -
Replies
13
Views
2K
LadyFinn
LadyFinn
iceflower
Princess Leonore, Prince Nicolas, Princess Adrienne News Part 2: January 2024 -
Replies
2
Views
991
Blog Real
Blog Real
iceflower
General News about Joachim, Marie and Family Part 7: January 2024 -
Replies
23
Views
5K
Prinsara
Prinsara

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom