Four years down the track; Is Mary OK now?


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Madame Royale said:
A main point of discusion I have noticed is that some took issue with the hype that has surrounded her. I think it pertinent to make mention that this was the media's doing, not Mary's.

What some may think to be an aloof air, I see as humble refinement. But that is just my opinion.

Some here have said Mary is more royal than many royal - look at Silvia and Sonja; so are they. It probably has a lot to do with being from the outside. A born princess has much more scope, I think. Look at Kalina of Bulgaria, or Stephanie of Monaco. I think a woman who marries into royalty is somehow expected to be more wife-y in style, more conservative, more humble, more perfect, more everything.

What is really interesting is that Mary has become such target - she doesn't seem unusual enough to me to be so criticised. Start a thread like this on any other princess and you will probably be kindly asked to leave :lol: Yet I cannot believe that I was the only one who doesn't much care for, say, Maxima.
 
auntie said:
She definitly was ambitious, Mette Marit, Maxima, Letizia and even Mathilde seemed so much more head over heels in love, they are definitly not perfect, (except for Mathilde, maybe) she had a goal and she acheived it,and she seems happy to boot.

Heu... eh... I have to correct a little bit on this: for Máxima (and she did admit it herself) it was no love at first sight at all or being head over heels. It was the Prince who started an offensive to win the heart of that mysterious blonde lady he saw in Sevilla.


I think that none of the present recent royal relationships was 'love on first sight', not Mary, Letizia, Mathilde.
Maybe Charles & Camilla and also Haakon & Mette-Marit are the exceptions.
 
Last edited:
I hear all you are saying, and again, all of you are right to a certain extent. I can't put my finger on it, but there is definitly something about Mary, which makes her get so much criticism. Mary fans, hold on! I think she is doing a fabulous job as Crown Princess and will be definitly a GR8 Queen, but, oh but, there is something about her manner which causes you to feel that she is ambitious in everything and she was very successful in getting whet she wanted! Part of my career (last 11 year)is in PR and I see up to a few dozen clients a day and I am very succesful in my field, which includes correctly evaluating clients, and I think I have a point!
 
UserDane said:
The funny thing is - had Mary been born a princess, her obvious striving to do this job as best as possible would have been applauded by everyone.
I like that you can actually see that she is trying to do this job to the best of her ability; it's an ongoing process I think so in 10 years she may appear different from today, and that's fine too.

Very good point:cool:
 
auntie said:
I hear all you are saying, and again, all of you are right to a certain extent. I can't put my finger on it, but there is definitly something about Mary, which makes her get so much criticism. Mary fans, hold on! I think she is doing a fabulous job as Crown Princess and will be definitly a GR8 Queen, but, oh but, there is something about her manner which causes you to feel that she is ambitious in everything and she was very successful in getting whet she wanted! Part of my career (last 11 year)is in PR and I see up to a few dozen clients a day and I am very succesful in my field, which includes correctly evaluating clients, and I think I have a point!

Congratulations! However, when was the last time Mary was in your office for an interview so that you could make this profound and correct evaluation.;) :rolleyes:
 
auntie said:
I hear all you are saying, and again, all of you are right to a certain extent. I can't put my finger on it, but there is definitly something about Mary, which makes her get so much criticism. Mary fans, hold on! I think she is doing a fabulous job as Crown Princess and will be definitly a GR8 Queen, but, oh but, there is something about her manner which causes you to feel that she is ambitious in everything and she was very successful in getting whet she wanted! Part of my career (last 11 year)is in PR and I see up to a few dozen clients a day and I am very succesful in my field, which includes correctly evaluating clients, and I think I have a point!

Isn't it rather sexist and old fashioned to condemn a woman for being ambitious? Or are modern women supposed to wait and serenely smile for our prince on a white horse to come riding by and if he doesn't we should just accept our lot in life.

Actually I don't necessarily think Mary is all that ambitious - focused yes, but ambitious? For a commoner to marry a prince these days is not so uncommon so for Mary to want to marry Frederik required some focus but she wasn't necessarily shooting for the stars.

Setting a goal, going about it in a methodical and common sense manner and then doing what it takes to achieve it is to my mind one of the highest ideals anyone can aspire to.

And yet when women display this admirable sense of focus, purpose and determination, they get branded as cold and calculating. Is there any wonder why women feel so guilty about going out and achieving their dreams when we turn around and condemn them for going out and making it happen?

With this attitude afoot, women might as well be barefoot and pregnant, always waiting for someone else to come and save them.
 
ysbel said:
Isn't it rather sexist and old fashioned to condemn a woman for being ambitious? Or are modern women supposed to wait and serenely smile for our prince on a white horse to come riding by and if he doesn't we should just accept our lot in life.

Actually I don't necessarily think Mary is all that ambitious - focused yes, but ambitious? For a commoner to marry a prince these days is not so uncommon so for Mary to want to marry Frederik required some focus but she wasn't necessarily shooting for the stars.

Setting a goal, going about it in a methodical and common sense manner and then doing what it takes to achieve it is to my mind one of the highest ideals anyone can aspire to.

And yet when women display this admirable sense of focus, purpose and determination, they get branded as cold and calculating. Is there any wonder why women feel so guilty about going out and achieving their dreams when we turn around and condemn them for going out and making it happen?

With this attitude afoot, women might as well be barefoot and pregnant, always waiting for someone else to come and save them.

Thank you for that speech :flowers: [bows deep]
 
ysbel said:
Isn't it rather sexist and old fashioned to condemn a woman for being ambitious? Or are modern women supposed to wait and serenely smile for our prince on a white horse to come riding by and if he doesn't we should just accept our lot in life.

Actually I don't necessarily think Mary is all that ambitious - focused yes, but ambitious? For a commoner to marry a prince these days is not so uncommon so for Mary to want to marry Frederik required some focus but she wasn't necessarily shooting for the stars.

Setting a goal, going about it in a methodical and common sense manner and then doing what it takes to achieve it is to my mind one of the highest ideals anyone can aspire to.

And yet when women display this admirable sense of focus, purpose and determination, they get branded as cold and calculating. Is there any wonder why women feel so guilty about going out and achieving their dreams when we turn around and condemn them for going out and making it happen?

With this attitude afoot, women might as well be barefoot and pregnant, always waiting for someone else to come and save them.

Well, I don´t think, that this is a thing, that feminism couldn´t get out of the way so far. I think there will be always some doubts, when a rich person with status is marrying one from middle class or even lower. And I guess since there are more male rich heirs out there, it´s only natural, that more women are accused of being too ambitious, enforcing things etc.

But maybe now one could explain me, what it is, that makes Mary focused or ambitious these days. Is it, because she is the one in this relationship, who is working most (?)
 
Henri M. said:
I think that none of the present recent royal relationships was 'love on first sight', not Mary, Letizia, Mathilde.
Maybe Charles & Camilla and also Haakon & Mette-Marit are the exceptions.

As Mathilde and Phillipe (AFAIK) first met at the funeral of Mathilde's sister Marie-Alix we can rule out the posibility of head over heals in during the first meeting sadly.

Originally Posted by ysbel
Isn't it rather sexist and old fashioned to condemn a woman for being ambitious? Or are modern women supposed to wait and serenely smile for our prince on a white horse to come riding by and if he doesn't we should just accept our lot in life.

Actually I don't necessarily think Mary is all that ambitious - focused yes, but ambitious? For a commoner to marry a prince these days is not so uncommon so for Mary to want to marry Frederik required some focus but she wasn't necessarily shooting for the stars.

Setting a goal, going about it in a methodical and common sense manner and then doing what it takes to achieve it is to my mind one of the highest ideals anyone can aspire to.

And yet when women display this admirable sense of focus, purpose and determination, they get branded as cold and calculating. Is there any wonder why women feel so guilty about going out and achieving their dreams when we turn around and condemn them for going out and making it happen?

With this attitude afoot, women might as well be barefoot and pregnant, always waiting for someone else to come and save them.

Amen to that!!!
 
Lena said:
Well, I don´t think, that this is a thing, that feminism couldn´t get out of the way so far. I think there will be always some doubts, when a rich person with status is marrying one from middle class or even lower. And I guess since there are more male rich heirs out there, it´s only natural, that more women are accused of being too ambitious, enforcing things etc.

But maybe now one could explain me, what it is, that makes Mary focused or ambitious these days. Is it, because she is the one in this relationship, who is working most (?)

I wholeheartedly agree that marriages have a better chance to succeed when the man and wife come from the same background but I don't see anything natural at all about a woman being called too ambitious if she marries a man with more status or money than her.

Men do end up making more money and getting more status than women anyway regardless of their class so I think a woman has to work hard to find a man who makes only as much money as she does and has her level of status and not higher. That man with her status level and paycheck would probably end up being called underpaid and unrecognized and not considered a good marriage candidate.
 
Crown princess Mary is doing a great job, and she seems to be an ambitius woman with integrety (so is Princess Alexandra), which for me is a very good thing. So she is very OK now.
 
Little_star said:
Perhaps, but she decided to upgrade her public image within weeks of meeting Fred. That says more about her future aspirations that anything else.

Well of course, isn't that normal?? Im sure if she didnt upgrader her appearance, people would say she simply doesnt care. I'm sorry, but what Mary did is completley normal in my eyes.

Little_star, if you were in Mary's position, before she met Fred and realised she would be in the public image, would you not take extra care about the way you look? If someone shoves a camera in your face, i would bet anything you would tidy up your hair or make sure you are looking good. Am I right?
 
Last edited:
I agree with you, Australian.

I think Mary is doing a great job and if I had been in her position I would certainly have made an effort to look my best and even seek advice about how to look my best. (it doesn't come naturally to all of us:) )

You only have to look at The Monaco thread to see the comments made about Charlene Wittstock (Prince Albert's current companion) and her looks and style and basically everything about the woman is questioned. (I know there are other reasons there as well - please don't take offense).

At the end of the days your looks and style are always judged if you are in the public eye- so you may as well make your best effort.
(Besides photographers always seem to be out to get the worst picture of a public figure anyway)
 
Mary is beautiful. Period. She was born with that. Sometimes I wonder if people would like her better if she was a little more homely. She had style before she was married, and now she has money, so she is even more stylish. I would be too.
 
That's what I actually like. Mary and also Letizia are not homely.
That's what makes them most interesting IMO.
I like Mathilde, Maxima and Mette-Marit too but they appear so awfully homely at times :lol:

.
 
ricarda said:
That's what I actually like. Mary and also Letizia are not homely.
That's what makes them most interesting IMO.
I like Mathilde, Maxima and Mette-Marit too but they appear so awfully homely at times :lol:

.

Mette-Marit is the most beautiful of the Crown Princesses, I think.
 
ricarda said:
That's what I actually like. Mary and also Letizia are not homely.
That's what makes them most interesting IMO.
I like Mathilde, Maxima and Mette-Marit too but they appear so awfully homely at times :lol:

I recently read some brief article about Mary and Letizia's pregnancy clothes, and on the reader comments quite a few Spanish readers thought Letizia plain next to Mary; in the pictures MAry was wearing the lilac gown from the New Year and diamonds, Letizia just some ordinary dress and no make-up. Tell me the press isn't trying to sell us something :lol:

Beauty is very much in the eye of beholder and so we will probably never get a concesus on who is the fairest of them all. But MAry looks very princessy, in my eyes much more than, say, Mette-MArit, who is also fabulously beautiful. It probably both pleases and puts off people.
 
I have posted on this topic in this thread before, so I'll avoid answering the question again.

I have a question. Why do some people think Mary is ambitious? Frederik is a good-looking, intelligent and sincerely nice guy. Even if he wasn't a prince, I think Mary could fall in love with him. Sure, it's more enticing that he's a wealthy prince, but he's hardly "below her" without his wealth and title. I know that people make the "ambitious" argument regarding W-A/Maxima and Philippe/Mathilde, because some argue that both princes are less attractive (physically? personality-wise? I'm not sure) than their wives, but I don't think this is the case in Mary/Fred's case. Frederik, even without the title and wealth, seems like a pretty great person, and I don't find it hard to believe that Mary would fall in love with Fred, the person, not Frederik, the future king of Denmark...
 
politikgirl said:
I have posted on this topic in this thread before, so I'll avoid answering the question again.

I have a question. Why do some people think Mary is ambitious? Frederik is a good-looking, intelligent and sincerely nice guy. Even if he wasn't a prince, I think Mary could fall in love with him. Sure, it's more enticing that he's a wealthy prince, but he's hardly "below her" without his wealth and title. I know that people make the "ambitious" argument regarding W-A/Maxima and Philippe/Mathilde, because some argue that both princes are less attractive (physically? personality-wise? I'm not sure) than their wives, but I don't think this is the case in Mary/Fred's case. Frederik, even without the title and wealth, seems like a pretty great person, and I don't find it hard to believe that Mary would fall in love with Fred, the person, not Frederik, the future king of Denmark...

Well if she is falling in love with the title as opposed to the person, that tells us that for Mary and Frederik, personal feelings about each other are not the be-all and end-all requirement for a successful marriage. That would not be unusual and that would also not be a sign of a broken marriage. On the contrary, some marriages like this are very successful.

Do they really love each other? Who really knows outside the couple themselves? Were they marrying into a lifestyle more than a person? Again, that's hard to judge from the outside.

And Fred could be marrying into a lifestyle just as much as Mary. His lifestyle and public image could be very different depending on the woman he married. Imagine a Frederik married to a Mette-Marit or a Maxima and how different their public life and roles would look. Mette-Marit would bring something very different to the role and Fred as a partner in this marriage would have to adjust.

I think Mary thought about the lifestyle she would lead if she married Frederik and I think Frederik thought about the type of life he would lead with Mary at his side. I think its smart to think whether they could be comfortable in the type of life they would lead with each other.
 
Jo of Palatine said:
IIRC correctly that Mary said in her engagement interviews that she first attended the course and then met the prince. If it is so, do you want to call her a liar in addition?

I'm sure she said that.
 
Whenn CP Frederik married Mary, he said:

"I love you Mary'. I heard him say that.

Obviously, he does love her, very much, and was prepared to say so to the whole world.

Since then, Mary has been an exemplary princess, in my opinion. She's attractive, has studied to learn her new country's language and culture, she's kind and understanding, always looks beautiful and elegant, and, first and foremost, has provided an heir to the throne. Additonally, there's evidence that she is, academically, intelligent.

I really don't know what else anyone can require in a Crown Princess. If, indeed, she falls short, then perhaps we may all reflect on the power of love. I've never once doubted that Frederik and Mary love each other, despite what some might say. Mary's body language towards Frederik which I've seen always celebrates their union.
 
Polly said:
Whenn CP Frederik married Mary, he said:

"I love you Mary'. I heard him say that.

Obviously, he does love her, very much, and was prepared to say so to the whole world.

Since then, Mary has been an exemplary princess, in my opinion. She's attractive, has studied to learn her new country's language and culture, she's kind and understanding, always looks beautiful and elegant, and, first and foremost, has provided an heir to the throne. Additonally, there's evidence that she is, academically, intelligent.

I really don't know what else anyone can require in a Crown Princess. If, indeed, she falls short, then perhaps we may all reflect on the power of love. I've never once doubted that Frederik and Mary love each other, despite what some might say. Mary's body language towards Frederik which I've seen always celebrates their union.


:clap: :clap: Great post.
 
Its lovely to see you posting, Polly :flowers:

Take care.

BTW: A lovely and very accurate (I think) observation, and one I share.
 
Last edited:
Well said Polly and yes I agree he did say for all the world to see "I love you Mary"

Stellad
 
That's what I actually like. Mary and also Letizia are not homely.
That's what makes them most interesting IMO.
I like Mathilde, Maxima and Mette-Marit too but they appear so awfully homely at times :lol:
OK, a misunderstanding. I just checked what "homely" actually means.
No, Mette-Marit, Mathilde and especially Maxima are not homely.:lol:
What I wanted to say is that Mary and Letizia give the most modern impression to me.

ysbel said:
Mette-Marit is the most beautiful of the Crown Princesses, I think.
I didn't mean Mette-Marit isn't beautiful (though I personally don't think she is the most beautiful).
But she was quite unconventional in the beginning and now she mostly appears as the proper little housewife and mother,
(that's what I considered to be "homely").
Which makes her perhaps a more accepted crownprincess but also - in my eyes - less interesting than before.
 
Last edited:
Mandy said:
Congratulations! However, when was the last time Mary was in your office for an interview so that you could make this profound and correct evaluation.;) :rolleyes:
What I meant, is from watching and observing her for the past few years, this is the impression she made to many of us round the globe!
 
Last edited:
ricarda said:
That's what I actually like. Mary and also Letizia are not homely.
That's what makes them most interesting IMO.
I like Mathilde, Maxima and Mette-Marit too but they appear so awfully homely at times :lol:

.

Maybe you are mistaking between homey and homely!
 
I think mary has improved since she has become crown princess of denmark and to think about it it would not be a easy job. This girl from down under who lived a normal life.This is before she became princess

Quote:

Mary Donaldson, firstly congratulations of course. The role you now are taking up, what do you think you can contribute to this very important role as Crown Princess in the future.

MARY:
That is a difficult question for me to answer today (she passes on to English) It is only my first day in that role today, you could say. So that is something that will develop in the future. It is a lot I have to learn, a lot to experience. But it is something, I surely look forward to to find out precisely what it is.

Question:
Mary Donaldson, what do you see as your biggest task as Crown Princess-to-be in the future?

MARY:It is hard to answer in Danish, so I want to answer in English. I have always been very busy doing things all my life. But this is something, that demands a lot of thinking, you have to think properly about, how you will do it, handle it strategically. I don't really think it is something I should tell a lot about in this forum today, because it is also something, that will develop on its way after I have found the way into my role.


Question:You will not only have a husband and a future king, but to a lifelong working task. In old days it was like the Princess on the pea, wasn't it? There was a test you had to pass? Did you have to pass such a test?

Mary Donaldson:I think there have been a lot of tests on the way, maybe I havn't even noticed that I participated in them. And that is probably why I am here today. So they are passed, yes.
 
tara1983 said:
I think mary has improved since she has become crown princess of denmark and to think about it it would not be a easy job. This girl from down under who lived a normal life.This is before she became princess

Quote:

Mary Donaldson, firstly congratulations of course. The role you now are taking up, what do you think you can contribute to this very important role as Crown Princess in the future.

MARY:
That is a difficult question for me to answer today (she passes on to English) It is only my first day in that role today, you could say. So that is something that will develop in the future. It is a lot I have to learn, a lot to experience. But it is something, I surely look forward to to find out precisely what it is.

Question:
Mary Donaldson, what do you see as your biggest task as Crown Princess-to-be in the future?

MARY:It is hard to answer in Danish, so I want to answer in English. I have always been very busy doing things all my life. But this is something, that demands a lot of thinking, you have to think properly about, how you will do it, handle it strategically. I don't really think it is something I should tell a lot about in this forum today, because it is also something, that will develop on its way after I have found the way into my role.


Question:You will not only have a husband and a future king, but to a lifelong working task. In old days it was like the Princess on the pea, wasn't it? There was a test you had to pass? Did you have to pass such a test?

Mary Donaldson:I think there have been a lot of tests on the way, maybe I havn't even noticed that I participated in them. And that is probably why I am here today. So they are passed, yes.
Judging by this excerpt, she definitely is a person who is skilled in using a lot of words to say absolutely nothing of substance! Or doesn't want to in public, which comes down to the same thing.

But on topic, to answer the question, "Is Mary ok now?"
I think my answer would be "Yes, she is."

For me, she currently is oneof the most interesting royal lady consorts to watch, and whether or not that is because she certainly is the one who puts in the most effort to look as elegant as possible, I can't say, can't put my finger on it.

She also seems to have made a real effort over the years.

Still, can't say that I actually LIKE the girl. I don't. That's because to me, she still comes across as haughty. More so than any other royal almost.

But anyhow, I think she is definitely ok.

The person who more merits this question is her husband, Fred. He's recently been picked as one of the "young world leaders to watch" or something. Well, folks, I've watched this guy for years on the forum now, and....NOTHING tells me this is a guy who is the next Nelson Mandela, the next Bill Clinton, the next Willem Alexander even, who has been stepping up to do something about the water problems this planet is facing. What's fred doing with his time besides sailing? His bios even don't even mention what he's occupying his time with CURRENTLY. Sure sure, we know about his military accomplishments, ifone can call it that. But ALL these princes have done most of those, so what's the big deal. Anyway, his own brother Joachim is more of a world leader these days than Fred.

So, is Mary ok? Definitely. But Fred? Well, hopefully, with time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom