The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Royal Highlights > Royal Jewels

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #201  
Old 07-09-2009, 11:57 PM
Opal's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Coastal, Ireland
Posts: 2,524
Quote:
Originally Posted by wymanda View Post
Perhaps she didn't ask! I'm sure that HM would not have refused had Diana asked to see what was available from the items that were not in use.
By the way, I was wondering... how does that work with the Royal jewels that are in the vaults? I mean aren't they all kept at the Tower of London? So when the Queen wants to pull something out of the vault does she have to go to the Tower to get what she wants? And what if Diana (or the Duchess of Cornwall) wanted to borrow something but they weren't sure what they wanted. Did/do they make a visit to the Tower to pick something out. I always wondered how that all worked.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #202  
Old 07-10-2009, 06:11 AM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,427
The Crown Jewels are kept in the Tower of London (crowns, orbs, sceptres, jewelled swords, Coronation regalia, etc).
The vast bulk of the Queen's collection is "private" or designated "left to the Crown" and most of these are believed to lie in the extensive vaults beneath Buckingham Palace.
The vaults could be described as a "treasure trove" or "Aladdin's Cave" of riches. What lies beneath very few know, and those that do don't tell.
I would assume that no-one gets in to have a look without the express permission of HM. The attitude is "they are private, and it's no-one else's business."
__________________

__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #203  
Old 07-22-2009, 08:47 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,533
Warren, wouldn't you think that what ever senior lady in the immediate family would be able to have her dresser call up and say, well for the following official tour she's wearing a gown of xyz colors to the White House (or wherever) and we'd like to see what we have that would look favorable? I mean obviously not a minor member, but a member of the immediate family?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #204  
Old 07-23-2009, 05:04 AM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,427
Well, we know that Princess Anne has worn a mystery tiara which we assume to have been delved from the vaults, but such examples are few and far between.
The only other tiara I can think of is the Delhi Durbar which made a surprise appearance on the DOC after lying for over half a century in the dark.
It would seem that HM is not as eager as us for the mysteries of the vaults to be to publicly revealed.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #205  
Old 07-23-2009, 05:46 AM
muriel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,282

I would tend to agree with you. My sense is other than the jewels that have been made available to the DoC (largely comprising elements of the QMs collection), HM tends not to dole out any. My sense is that she has provided Anne and Sophie with the amounts of jewellery she considers appropriate, and she is not planning to dig further into the collection in a hurry.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #206  
Old 07-23-2009, 08:16 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,533
I would think as Andrew's daughters get a bit older and start to attend royal functions that HM will loan them some pieces, so they dont look bare! Hopefully, anyway. It seems such a pity that so many treasures never see the light of day. I would be down visiting them once a week if I had the key to the vault!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #207  
Old 07-23-2009, 01:29 PM
muriel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,282
Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter View Post
I would think as Andrew's daughters get a bit older and start to attend royal functions that HM will loan them some pieces, so they dont look bare!
I have no doubt that B&E will receive pieces of jewellery from HM at the appropriate time in their lives. No doubt some thought would go into selecting the pieces that they will receive, to reflect their relative position in the future of their monarchy.

That said, my sense is that they will not be attending major royal events like state banquets that typically require jewellery, again reflecting their relative position in the future of their monarchy.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #208  
Old 07-24-2009, 04:47 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Diest, Belgium
Posts: 317
Once Charles is King, the focus will be on the young Princes and their future spouses. Charles' intention is to have a smaller Royal Family in his reign. The fact that the cousins are now so involved is a bit The Queen's own choice, because she intended to have a role to play for e.g. Princess Alexandra, ...
I suppose that the jewellery collection will be reserved for the next generation of royal ladies in the front rank of the family; and the daughters of Andrew, I really think that they will have a second-line place and for that reason not having use of tiaras, huge necklaces, ...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #209  
Old 07-24-2009, 06:04 PM
muriel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,282

Quite right
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #210  
Old 08-02-2009, 02:26 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 17
I came across this picture of the Queen, I think it was taken in Canada and it looks like the 1970's. I don't recognise the tiara she is wearing, it looks like aquamarine but not the Brazilian one. Does anyone know anything about this tiara or have a better picture of it?

QueenCanadaAnnAquatiara.jpg picture by davidj_album - Photobucket
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #211  
Old 08-02-2009, 09:43 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: toowoomba, Australia
Posts: 256
They are the Braziliam aquamarine V shaped hair ornaments that were given to The Queen in 1968 during her first State Visit there.
They have since been dismanted to put into the current aquamarine tiara.
Field page 21
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 08-05-2009, 07:29 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Diest, Belgium
Posts: 317
The Kent Demi Parure was worn I believe when Her Majesty The Queen paid a State Visit to Portugal in 1984. The Queen actually favours the Queen Mother's Ruby Necklace, her own Ruby Swag necklace or the one she ordered to buy from the Baring Family.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 08-06-2009, 10:30 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 247
Quote:
Originally Posted by QueenElizabeth View Post
or the one she ordered to buy from the Baring Family.
Which one is this ?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 08-07-2009, 03:23 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Diest, Belgium
Posts: 317
The Baring ruby necklace was worn by The Queen on 8 November 2005 when she entertained The President of the People's Republic of China during the State Banquet. Perhaps you can look it up in the pictures. The necklace was sold at Sotheby's in April 1964 and was purchased on behalf of The Queen. It has a chatelaine centre.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 08-08-2009, 07:16 PM
jcbcode99's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidJ View Post
I came across this picture of the Queen, I think it was taken in Canada and it looks like the 1970's. I don't recognise the tiara she is wearing, it looks like aquamarine but not the Brazilian one. Does anyone know anything about this tiara or have a better picture of it?

QueenCanadaAnnAquatiara.jpg picture by davidj_album - Photobucket
Isn't it lovely? It's a pity it was dismantled to create that hideous thing she now wears. This really was a most attractive piece.
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 08-08-2009, 07:24 PM
jcbcode99's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,980
The Baring ruby necklace, bought 1964

Quote:
Originally Posted by noldorlord View Post
Which one is this ?
Here is a pic from the Royal Collection; I rather like it. I don't care for the one she recieved from the Saudi's, however. This is lovely.

://www.royalcollection.org.uk/microsites/dressfortheoccasion/object.asp?exhibs=BPSO2006jewellery&item=3
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 08-08-2009, 07:28 PM
jcbcode99's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by QueenElizabeth View Post
The Baring ruby necklace was worn by The Queen on 8 November 2005 when she entertained The President of the People's Republic of China during the State Banquet. Perhaps you can look it up in the pictures. The necklace was sold at Sotheby's in April 1964 and was purchased on behalf of The Queen. It has a chatelaine centre.
Actually, she did not wear rubies on that particular date--she wore the Girls of Great Britain tiara and a diamond necklace:
Getty Images - Unsupported browser detected
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 08-08-2009, 09:19 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mentone, Australia
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbcode99 View Post
Isn't it lovely? It's a pity it was dismantled to create that hideous thing she now wears. This really was a most attractive piece.
I have to agree with you jcbcode, the original was lovely, the remodelled version, not so classic
__________________
Leighnh
If it is to be then it is up to me.
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 08-08-2009, 09:44 PM
Marsel's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 966
I simply hate that aquamarine hair ornament: the aquamarine tiara might not be among the most stunning tiaras Her Majesty possesses but it looks much better than the hairpiece. It might have looked lovely on 16-22 years old debutante Princess, but it simply doesn’t work for an older lady, in my opinion.
__________________
Audentes fortuna iuvat - Fortune favours the bold *** ... ***Amore, more, ore, re - Love, behaviour, words, actions *** ... ***Aquila non capit muscas - An eagle does not hunt flies
Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 08-09-2009, 11:48 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 1,262
The ruby necklace is gorgeous.I would love to see that with the central pendant only,though.It looks a bit heavy with 3 pendants.JMHO.So,how's the DoC connected with the ruby parure?Has she worn it recently?
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
elizabeth ii, jewels, necklaces, photo, queen elizabeth ii, tiara, tiaras


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Queen Elizabeth II's Fashion and Style Part 3: February 2011 - April 2012 iceflower Archives 391 04-26-2012 02:07 PM
Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh: State Visit to Ireland - 17-20 May 2011 Warren Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh 120 01-04-2012 05:55 PM
Ehrenbambi for Queen Rania: November 29, 2007 principessa King Abdullah and Queen Rania and Family 43 05-05-2011 07:29 AM




Popular Tags
abdication belgium birth carl philip charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events fashion germany grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta leonor infanta sofia jewellery jordan king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia luxembourg nobility official visit ottoman pregnancy president hollande prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince daniel prince floris prince maurits prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess alexia (2005 -) princess anita princess astrid princess beatrix princess charlene princess claire princess mabel princess madeleine princess margriet princess mary queen anne-marie queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen silvia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit stockholm sweden the hague visit wedding



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]