Muhler
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2010
- Messages
- 17,506
- City
- Eastern Jutland
- Country
- Denmark
There will be no problem regarding Princess Amalia's future annual income thanks to an inventive mechanism in the Dutch Budget systematic. It prescribes that foreseeable expenditures withing five years need to be reported.
So on Prinsjesdag 2016 the King presented the State Budget 2017 in which, for the first time, the future income of the Princess of Orange was mentioned.
It has been discussed with every reading of every annual State Budget. In 2016, in 2017 and now in 2018. The current Budget still is under reading in the Senate for the final vote. But Amalia will be 100% safe. Do you know why? Look how many of the 150 members of the Chamber have approved the Budget of the King.....:
https://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstu...g=wetsvoorsteldetails&qry=wetsvoorstel:34775I
It would be utter inconsequence to block Amalia's income while in all these years the Parliament voted with almost unanimity. This year the Partij voor de Dieren (Animal Rights Party) voted against the Budget 2019. Not that it has anything to do with the income for Princess Amalia. It is a protest against the wildlife management on the Crown Domains for which the King is responsible (wildlife management sometimes involves the shooting of animals).
Yes, of course she will get the money and of course it will be voted through the Parliament.
My point is that if there is a public debate saying: Why give such an amount to the Princess of Orange if she is hardly doing anything and we hardly know her? Can't she cope with a part-time secretary?
I cannot emphasize strongly enough that I am not blaming Amalia, her current work schedule or lack of it, is not her decision. - It's another matter when she's eighteen though.
But why oh why subject her to criticism if it is so easy to deflect it by giving her a hand full of jobs a year before she turns eighteen? - Something that IMO is good practice as well.
Last edited: