I said there were claims I found proven wrong and the "they didn't give Archie a title because of racism" was one of them.I don't think they were wrong in their claims that the firm wasn't exactly helpful to them. Let's also not pretend the allegations of racism don't run a lot deeper than "just" the claims regarding the titles...If you afford one party the benefit of doubt, it rings a bit hollow if you don't extend it to the other party as well.
I actually did afford Harry and Meghan the benefit of doubt by suggesting what I thought about the claims they made without excluding the possibility that there were real offences.
Since you suggested that Harry and Meghan might have been "the" injured party, isn't it the same non-allowance of the benefit of doubt that you're blaming me of, only placed on the other party?
Last edited by a moderator: