Osipi
Member - in Memoriam
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2008
- Messages
- 17,268
- City
- On the west side of North up from Back
- Country
- United States
It *is* summertime and the known "silly" season and I do have to admit that the Markle antics do somewhat keep me amused. I, like the rest of us here, also know not to take anything out of a Markle mouth seriously and this summer just may be waiting to see how low can they go.
TRF will always be a place where Meghan is front and center with us along with the rest of the threads on the royals around the world. Its what we do here.
Its just kind of reassuring that we can talk about the Markles and what they get up to without it being taken seriously by anyone that their words, their antics and their strategies are actually breaking news and will make a difference in the world "out there".
My point was to enhance the decision by BBC and ITV that they're not going to treat these Markle e(strange)d family members as anything but what they really are. They're not celebrities or newsworthy in their own rights by any stretch and they're not going to bill them as such.
I, for the life of me, could never understand why people that have had no contact really with Meghan at all other than distantly being related (the Dooleys and Tom, Jr's ex-wife) could have been thought of as "important" and knowledgeable enough to be "royal correspondents" for Meghan and Harry's wedding. That really baffled me.
We'll *always* talk about anything and everything to do with the British royal family down to the minute detail. Its what we do best here.
TRF will always be a place where Meghan is front and center with us along with the rest of the threads on the royals around the world. Its what we do here.
Its just kind of reassuring that we can talk about the Markles and what they get up to without it being taken seriously by anyone that their words, their antics and their strategies are actually breaking news and will make a difference in the world "out there".
My point was to enhance the decision by BBC and ITV that they're not going to treat these Markle e(strange)d family members as anything but what they really are. They're not celebrities or newsworthy in their own rights by any stretch and they're not going to bill them as such.
I, for the life of me, could never understand why people that have had no contact really with Meghan at all other than distantly being related (the Dooleys and Tom, Jr's ex-wife) could have been thought of as "important" and knowledgeable enough to be "royal correspondents" for Meghan and Harry's wedding. That really baffled me.
We'll *always* talk about anything and everything to do with the British royal family down to the minute detail. Its what we do best here.