politikgirl
Aristocracy
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2005
- Messages
- 235
- City
- Toronto
- Country
- Canada
It's really nice to see William and Harry taking on a public role in commemorating Diana.
politikgirl said:It's really nice to see William and Harry taking on a public role in commemorating Diana.
politikgirl said:Well, I would agree with you if there was evidence that they were being forced into "remembering" their mother, but I don't see any evidence indicating that they're doing this involuntarily.
politikgirl said:Well, I would agree with you if there was evidence that they were being forced into "remembering" their mother, but I don't see any evidence indicating that they're doing this involuntarily.
Panther2000 said:For some strange reason i f the boys want to do something for the woman that gave them life & whome they adored & the world loved. & Being that they would want to honor her.
Well, then I guess they are being forced to do that. Yeah, I could see that
Skydragon said:You seem to think that in order to 'honour' their mother, they must publicly wear sackcloth! Are you all saying that up until this moment in time, they felt nothing for their dead mother? No the 'world' didn't love her but, presumably her sons did.
Why should they have to be public with their feelings. You clearly can't accept the possibility that the paper that published this story, without any confirmation from anyone, has invented the story, to sell papers and to force their hand, they may have wanted something other than yet another 'pop concert'.
Jo of Palatine said:Skydragon, but maybe they have ideas like that - after all their own father is quite versed in organizing pop concerts for his "prince's trust" and they certainly seemed amused the last time they attended. So it's not so way off, especially as the 10. anniversery is approaching and not only many people but the princes themselves might thing it is appropriate to do something to raise a bit of money for her fund as well, just like they do for their father's trust.
But I agree, after the fast food news we were fed these last weeks about the princes one tend to dismiss any story written by the tabloids at the moment.
Skydragon said:I suppose it boils down to the fact, that I find it distasteful, the way it is being implied, that the princes have been lax, because they do not constantly mention their dead mother, as if the posters 'grief' is/was somehow more important because they are/were more vocal, than William or Harry.
Jo of Palatine said:You're right: noone seems to think of the feelings of these boys and take them into account (saying that after emerging from tucking in an adolescent boy who lost his Dad when he was only 6... There is hidden grief there and there is with the princes, lots and lots of it, no doubt about that!)
corazon said:the queen will be in the william's graduation in december, 5?
Skydragon said:Speaking out
New technology has given the average soldier what they have never had before - a voice. But how have their gripes and grumbles been aired before and what do the changes mean?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6159061.stm
If you are in a hurry, rush down to the last two paragraphs!
karla64 said:Are William and Harry Really Planning a $200,000 Christmas Party...
http://www.theroyalist.net/content/view/1489/1/
Skydragon said:How NOT to hold the baby: William's hug 'was health risk'
It was the heartwarming image which showed the world Prince William had inherited his mother's gentle touch.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=419708&in_page_id=1766&ito=1490
Skydragon said:How NOT to hold the baby: William's hug 'was health risk'
It was the heartwarming image which showed the world Prince William had inherited his mother's gentle touch.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=419708&in_page_id=1766&ito=1490